I liked the ideas about mental health care.
IMO? Anyone on any sort of mental health pharmaceutical? Should probably be automatically disqualified from owning a gun. Would we allow drug addicts to drive? To operate heavy machinery?
Well? Should we allow these kids to turn eighteen and then purchase firearms?
Psychological conditions, needing "medication?" There is, and never has been, a blood test for any of them. . . yet, these can often, and have been proven, multiple times, to send folks over the edge. Still, the establishment is more likely to blame the GUN, rather than the drugs, why is this?
I was on some of these medications after my AVM surgery, and suffered depression for several years, that shit is toxic. You eventually come to realize, it is just a mask, it covers up your problems, and prevents you from working on them. And working on these problems in a constructive way is essential for personal growth.
Solving these types of problems is more difficult than getting in physical shape, I'm not going to lie.
It is especially difficult for those who have suffered PTSD and other forms of severe mental & physical trauma.
something Matt said must have advanced the Biddum agenda, and nothing good can come out of that.
I am afraid you are right. Either gun control or big-pharma, red flags, either way, it will only make things more disjointed, and worse. Society has real problems. We need healing, not taking folks rights away. They may be using him, though I am not sure he is even aware of it. . . they might be trying to get a middle compromise here. . .
I'd be really curious to see someone crunch the stats, to see, how much these mass killings have increased, since SSRI's have been in mass use.

And since ADHD drugs have been in use. ETC.
I will see the OP's celebrity spokesman, with another, more timely and relevant, (and elder celebrity,) spokesman, who is hotter than hell right now. . . (and up the ante.)