If you care about the country you have to vote Trump...Hugh Hewitt

[2aguy]

What's this "we" shit? You [some user name I can't be bothered copying] are the only one complaining.

Even when you'd used the reply button in the post he or she complained about.

I honestly haven't a clue what he/she/it is talking about.

Classical Liberalism.....the beliefs of Modern Conservatives......and the opposite of modern "liberals".....

The modern liberal is using New Speak.....hiding their big government, anti private property, anti freedom beliefs behind a word that does not describe who they really are...they are not liberal.....they are authoritarian...

What Is Classical Liberalism?

"Classical liberalism" is the term used to designate the ideology advocating private property, an unhampered market economy, the rule of law, constitutional guarantees of freedom of religion and of the press, and international peace based on free trade. Up until around 1900, this ideology was generally known simply as liberalism.

The qualifying "classical" is now usually necessary, in English-speaking countries at least (but not, for instance, in France), because liberalism has come to be associated with wide-ranging interferences with private property and the market on behalf of egalitarian goals.

This version of liberalism — if such it can still be called — is sometimes designated as "social," or (erroneously) "modern" or the "new," liberalism. Here we shall use liberalism to signify the classical variety.

 

[HUGGY]

What's this "we" shit? You [some user name I can't be bothered copying] are the only one complaining.

Even when you'd used the reply button in the post he or she complained about.

I honestly haven't a clue what he/she/it is talking about.

Classical Liberalism.....the beliefs of Modern Conservatives......and the opposite of modern "liberals".....

The modern liberal is using New Speak.....hiding their big government, anti private property, anti freedom beliefs behind a word that does not describe who they really are...they are not liberal.....they are authoritarian...

What Is Classical Liberalism?

"Classical liberalism" is the term used to designate the ideology advocating private property, an unhampered market economy, the rule of law, constitutional guarantees of freedom of religion and of the press, and international peace based on free trade. Up until around 1900, this ideology was generally known simply as liberalism.

The qualifying "classical" is now usually necessary, in English-speaking countries at least (but not, for instance, in France), because liberalism has come to be associated with wide-ranging interferences with private property and the market on behalf of egalitarian goals.

This version of liberalism — if such it can still be called — is sometimes designated as "social," or (erroneously) "modern" or the "new," liberalism. Here we shall use liberalism to signify the classical variety.

You are a wack job. I don't believe in any of that crap.

 

[cnm]

'"Classical liberalism" is the term used to designate the ideology advocating private property [...]'

Yet "Classical liberalism" was anti slavery, anti property in other words. Mises does what all rightards do, invents meanings for words that let them define an argument they would not otherwise be able to make.

 

[2aguy]

What's this "we" shit? You [some user name I can't be bothered copying] are the only one complaining.

Even when you'd used the reply button in the post he or she complained about.

I honestly haven't a clue what he/she/it is talking about.

Classical Liberalism.....the beliefs of Modern Conservatives......and the opposite of modern "liberals".....

The modern liberal is using New Speak.....hiding their big government, anti private property, anti freedom beliefs behind a word that does not describe who they really are...they are not liberal.....they are authoritarian...

What Is Classical Liberalism?

"Classical liberalism" is the term used to designate the ideology advocating private property, an unhampered market economy, the rule of law, constitutional guarantees of freedom of religion and of the press, and international peace based on free trade. Up until around 1900, this ideology was generally known simply as liberalism.

The qualifying "classical" is now usually necessary, in English-speaking countries at least (but not, for instance, in France), because liberalism has come to be associated with wide-ranging interferences with private property and the market on behalf of egalitarian goals.

This version of liberalism — if such it can still be called — is sometimes designated as "social," or (erroneously) "modern" or the "new," liberalism. Here we shall use liberalism to signify the classical variety.

You are a wack job. I don't believe in any of that crap.

Look at what "liberal" believe.....authoritarian statism......no freedom of religion.....no private property rights.....they want to control the internet........

The ones who actually defend what the founders believed, individual liberty, religious freedom, private property rights, a color blind society....all men are created equal...........are American Conservatives and Libertarians......

And don't trot out Trump....he is not a conservative or libertarian...he is himself.......and he is all we have to stop the totalitarian hilary........

you guys don't remember.....the first week in office they ordered up over 1000 FBI files, and sold access to the White HOuse, allowed Loral space to give technology to the Chinese.......

They are corrupt through and through...

 

[2aguy]

"Classical liberalism" is the term used to designate the ideology advocating private property,

Yet "Classical liberalism" was anti slavery, anti property in other words. Mises does what all rightards do, invent meanings for words that let them define an argument they would not otherwise be able to make.

Yes.......who were the slave owners....democrats...who are still the racists...democrats.....their entire party is fixated on race and controlling people...

Slaves are not property....they were victims.....nice try though...and the Founders tried to limit the European and African slavery as much as they could.......

 

[cnm]

Slaves are not property.

They absolutely are.

 

[cnm]

Slaves are not property....they were victims.....nice try though...and the Founders tried to limit the European and African slavery as much as they could.......

You mean they could have given slave owners a whole vote instead of three fifths for their property?

 

[2aguy]

Slaves are not property....they were victims.....nice try though...and the Founders tried to limit the European and African slavery as much as they could.......

You mean they could have given slave owners a whole vote instead of three fifths for their property?

The future democrat slave owners wanted slaves to count for representation...the Founders blocked that to keep them from having more power......

Slavery, brought here by the Europeans and African, was a problem we had to deal with...and the future democrats really, really wanted their slaves......