One college prof a university does not make. I suggest that the students change classes to professors that aren't as wack as the example you are sharing. If necessary the student may have to find a college that better suits him/her.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
If you care about the country you have to vote Trump...Hugh Hewitt
- Thread starter 2aguy
- Start date
One college prof a university does not make. I suggest that the students change classes to professors that aren't as wack as the example you are sharing. If necessary the student may have to find a college that better suits him/her.
Usually in college you can't pick and choose -- there are not enough classes offered to play that game.The problem is that Liberals actually HATE this country.
What a silly thing to say. You are suggesting that you and only those who think like you have a patent on patriotism. What a foolish idea. I have to ask if you came up with that idea on your own?
I don't personally agree with much of the platform of democrats because it involves too much that should be handled by the individual. Still, if the majority votes for things that don't exceed the scope of the Constitution then who am I to deny them.
No sir. You do not own this country nor do you have any moral right to decide what law abiding American is or is not patriotic.
We do, we don't denigrate the country and bring up shit from like 150 years ago....constantly bitch and moan about this country.
Douches like this guy are not conservative or republican..
College prof makes students recite anti-American 'pledge of allegiance' | Fox News
One college prof a university does not make. I suggest that the students change classes to professors that aren't as wack as the example you are sharing. If necessary the student may have to find a college that better suits him/her.
We cannot tell who your "you" is in your first sentence.HUGGY , as usual you forgot to press the "reply" button so as usual we don't have any idea who your "you" is.The problem is that Liberals actually HATE this country.
What a silly thing to say. You are suggesting that you and only those who think like you have a patent on patriotism. What a foolish idea. I have to ask if you came up with that idea on your own?
I don't personally agree with much of the platform of democrats because it involves too much that should be handled by the individual. Still, if the majority votes for things that don't exceed the scope of the Constitution then who am I to deny them.
No sir. You do not own this country nor do you have any moral right to decide what law abiding American is or is not patriotic.
Go back and try this again.
They should have taught you in 9th Grade English not to start your paragraphs with a pronoun.
Never never never start your paragraphs with a pronoun.
"You" is a pronoun.
"HUGGY" is a proper noun.
Not sure to what you are referring. It looks OK to me.
You started a paragraph with a pronoun.
That is bad grammar.
Usually in college you can't pick and choose -- there are not enough classes offered to play that game.The problem is that Liberals actually HATE this country.
What a silly thing to say. You are suggesting that you and only those who think like you have a patent on patriotism. What a foolish idea. I have to ask if you came up with that idea on your own?
I don't personally agree with much of the platform of democrats because it involves too much that should be handled by the individual. Still, if the majority votes for things that don't exceed the scope of the Constitution then who am I to deny them.
No sir. You do not own this country nor do you have any moral right to decide what law abiding American is or is not patriotic.
We do, we don't denigrate the country and bring up shit from like 150 years ago....constantly bitch and moan about this country.
Douches like this guy are not conservative or republican..
College prof makes students recite anti-American 'pledge of allegiance' | Fox News
One college prof a university does not make. I suggest that the students change classes to professors that aren't as wack as the example you are sharing. If necessary the student may have to find a college that better suits him/her.
I wouldn't attend a school that demanded reciting an anti-American pledge. There are a lot of colleges.
sonic
VIP Member
- Dec 30, 2015
- 1,089
- 221
- 80
What a fucked up thought process. Elect an emotionally unstable guy who has no idea what he's doing and has the potential to do major damage to our economy (his proposals would take our debt to 127% of GDP) just because you want conservatives on the Supreme Court. You people are out of your fucking minds.
Yep. It's why they side with Muslims. Both are anti civilization.The problem is that Liberals actually HATE this country.
We cannot tell who your "you" is in your first sentence.HUGGY , as usual you forgot to press the "reply" button so as usual we don't have any idea who your "you" is.The problem is that Liberals actually HATE this country.
What a silly thing to say. You are suggesting that you and only those who think like you have a patent on patriotism. What a foolish idea. I have to ask if you came up with that idea on your own?
I don't personally agree with much of the platform of democrats because it involves too much that should be handled by the individual. Still, if the majority votes for things that don't exceed the scope of the Constitution then who am I to deny them.
No sir. You do not own this country nor do you have any moral right to decide what law abiding American is or is not patriotic.
Go back and try this again.
They should have taught you in 9th Grade English not to start your paragraphs with a pronoun.
Never never never start your paragraphs with a pronoun.
"You" is a pronoun.
"HUGGY" is a proper noun.
Not sure to what you are referring. It looks OK to me.
You started a paragraph with a pronoun.
That is bad grammar.
Perfect grammar is not a requirement here at USMB. You've been here a little over a month. Relax or find a MB more suitable to your sensibilities.
Hoho, from even before Bozo's co-star was born according to your assertion.The Republican party has always been considered the party of Lincoln & Reagan.
Huggy if we cannot understand what you are talking about then it's like a tree falling in the forest and nobody hears it !!!We cannot tell who your "you" is in your first sentence.HUGGY , as usual you forgot to press the "reply" button so as usual we don't have any idea who your "you" is.The problem is that Liberals actually HATE this country.
What a silly thing to say. You are suggesting that you and only those who think like you have a patent on patriotism. What a foolish idea. I have to ask if you came up with that idea on your own?
I don't personally agree with much of the platform of democrats because it involves too much that should be handled by the individual. Still, if the majority votes for things that don't exceed the scope of the Constitution then who am I to deny them.
No sir. You do not own this country nor do you have any moral right to decide what law abiding American is or is not patriotic.
Go back and try this again.
They should have taught you in 9th Grade English not to start your paragraphs with a pronoun.
Never never never start your paragraphs with a pronoun.
"You" is a pronoun.
"HUGGY" is a proper noun.
Not sure to what you are referring. It looks OK to me.
You started a paragraph with a pronoun.
That is bad grammar.
Perfect grammar is not a requirement here at USMB. You've been here a little over a month. Relax or find a MB more suitable to your sensibilities.
Use the "reply" button or use proper nouns -- not pronouns out the wazoo !!!
Neotrotsky
Council to Supreme Soviet
If you care about the country you have to vote Trump...Hugh Hewitt
Indeed
Don't let Queen Hillary finish the job Papa Obama started
Indeed
Don't let Queen Hillary finish the job Papa Obama started
Huggy if we cannot understand what you are talking about then it's like a tree falling in the forest and nobody hears it !!!We cannot tell who your "you" is in your first sentence.HUGGY , as usual you forgot to press the "reply" button so as usual we don't have any idea who your "you" is.What a silly thing to say. You are suggesting that you and only those who think like you have a patent on patriotism. What a foolish idea. I have to ask if you came up with that idea on your own?
I don't personally agree with much of the platform of democrats because it involves too much that should be handled by the individual. Still, if the majority votes for things that don't exceed the scope of the Constitution then who am I to deny them.
No sir. You do not own this country nor do you have any moral right to decide what law abiding American is or is not patriotic.
Go back and try this again.
They should have taught you in 9th Grade English not to start your paragraphs with a pronoun.
Never never never start your paragraphs with a pronoun.
"You" is a pronoun.
"HUGGY" is a proper noun.
Not sure to what you are referring. It looks OK to me.
You started a paragraph with a pronoun.
That is bad grammar.
Perfect grammar is not a requirement here at USMB. You've been here a little over a month. Relax or find a MB more suitable to your sensibilities.
Use the "reply" button or use proper nouns -- not pronouns out the wazoo !!!
What's this "we" shit? You are the only one complaining.
Spare_change
Gold Member
- Jun 27, 2011
- 8,690
- 1,293
- 280
The problem is that Liberals actually HATE this country.
so says someone voting for the guy who shills for putin because the Russians are the only ones who will lend him money
C'mon ... why do you want to inject stupidity into a supposedly adult conversation?
So you start a post with 'we'.We cannot tell who your "you" is in your first sentence.
You started a paragraph with a pronoun.
That is bad grammar.
You are an idiot.
Spare_change
Gold Member
- Jun 27, 2011
- 8,690
- 1,293
- 280
this is an important look at the 3 desperately important points why Trump needs to be the next President as made by an anti Trumper during the primaries.....
1) the Supreme Court...it is worse than you think...
2). Hilary is now owned by foreign countries because of her emails, as are those who bribed her
3) filling political and bureaucratic positions in the federal government...
It's the Supreme Court, stupid
Hillary Clinton wins, the Left gavels in a solid, lasting, almost certainly permanent majority on the Supreme Court. Every political issue has a theoretical path to SCOTUS, and only self-imposed judicial restraint has checked the Court's appetite and reach for two centuries.
That restraint will be gone when HRC's first appointee is sworn in. Finished.
This is not hyperbole. I have the advantage of having taught Con Law for 20 years, of having argued before very liberal appellate judges like Judge Stephen Reinhardt of the very liberal Ninth Circuit, of practicing with the best litigators in the land, and I know what a very liberal SCOTUS means: conservatism is done. It cannot survive a strong-willed liberal majority on the Supreme Court. Every issue, EVERY issue, will end up there, and the legislatures' judgments will matter not a bit.
---------------
Second, but much harder to see or understand, Hillary Clinton is thoroughly compromised by the Russians (or the Chinese, or the Iranians, or all of them). Deny the testimony of expert witnesses like former CIA Acting Director Mike Morell or Rudy Guiliani if you want, or the implications of the distribution of DNC emails via the WikiLeaks front, but just know everything she sent and received on her security-free "private" server is in the hands of the bad guys.
The influence they will have over her and all of her cyberassociates as a result will be complete even if unknown to the folks being worked and watched.
That's espionage. The Russians are very good at it. They are a GEICO ad of spying: That's what they do. They use what they steal to advance their national interest, sometimes crudely, sometimes with breathtaking sophistication. The consequences of her complete compromise haven't sunk in yet, but it is real, not reversible, and dangerous beyond description to the national security of the U.S. Trump critics worry that he's oblivious to Vladimir Putin's risks. Hillary is already a Putin pawn.
-----------------
The first two arguments are negatives. But there is a positive case for Donald Trump, a third prong in the case for working for Trump's election: He brings 3,000 political appointees with him, and the first two — Indiana Gov. Mike Pence as VP and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie has chief of the transition — telegraph that the vast majority of his team in the executive branch (and his appointees on the courts) will be conservatives.
----------------
Read or listen to the long interview I conducted with Gov. Pence on Friday morning, then put down your #NeverTrump pride and start working to save the Supreme Court and national security. Help Christie staff the new government. Explain to family and friends what Clinton's compromised status means. Argue for the future and make peace with the present.
Why would most Americans, who support Roe v Wade, and same sex marriage, vote for someone who will put judges on the court who would take away those rights?
Is that right? You know this, because .... ???
He has said he will appoint judges who insist that the Constitution is the defining document. Nothing more ... nothing less. If that scares you, is that because you actually think Roe v Wade and same sex marriage are unconstitutional, and thus, will come under attack?
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,973
- 52,243
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #75
Yea, look at what the Conservative Supreme Court has done since conservatives became the majority. Do I even have to spell it out?this is an important look at the 3 desperately important points why Trump needs to be the next President as made by an anti Trumper during the primaries.....
1) the Supreme Court...it is worse than you think...
2). Hilary is now owned by foreign countries because of her emails, as are those who bribed her
3) filling political and bureaucratic positions in the federal government...
It's the Supreme Court, stupid
Hillary Clinton wins, the Left gavels in a solid, lasting, almost certainly permanent majority on the Supreme Court. Every political issue has a theoretical path to SCOTUS, and only self-imposed judicial restraint has checked the Court's appetite and reach for two centuries.
That restraint will be gone when HRC's first appointee is sworn in. Finished.
This is not hyperbole. I have the advantage of having taught Con Law for 20 years, of having argued before very liberal appellate judges like Judge Stephen Reinhardt of the very liberal Ninth Circuit, of practicing with the best litigators in the land, and I know what a very liberal SCOTUS means: conservatism is done. It cannot survive a strong-willed liberal majority on the Supreme Court. Every issue, EVERY issue, will end up there, and the legislatures' judgments will matter not a bit.
---------------
Second, but much harder to see or understand, Hillary Clinton is thoroughly compromised by the Russians (or the Chinese, or the Iranians, or all of them). Deny the testimony of expert witnesses like former CIA Acting Director Mike Morell or Rudy Guiliani if you want, or the implications of the distribution of DNC emails via the WikiLeaks front, but just know everything she sent and received on her security-free "private" server is in the hands of the bad guys.
The influence they will have over her and all of her cyberassociates as a result will be complete even if unknown to the folks being worked and watched.
That's espionage. The Russians are very good at it. They are a GEICO ad of spying: That's what they do. They use what they steal to advance their national interest, sometimes crudely, sometimes with breathtaking sophistication. The consequences of her complete compromise haven't sunk in yet, but it is real, not reversible, and dangerous beyond description to the national security of the U.S. Trump critics worry that he's oblivious to Vladimir Putin's risks. Hillary is already a Putin pawn.
-----------------
The first two arguments are negatives. But there is a positive case for Donald Trump, a third prong in the case for working for Trump's election: He brings 3,000 political appointees with him, and the first two — Indiana Gov. Mike Pence as VP and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie has chief of the transition — telegraph that the vast majority of his team in the executive branch (and his appointees on the courts) will be conservatives.
----------------
Read or listen to the long interview I conducted with Gov. Pence on Friday morning, then put down your #NeverTrump pride and start working to save the Supreme Court and national security. Help Christie staff the new government. Explain to family and friends what Clinton's compromised status means. Argue for the future and make peace with the present.
They haven't had a majority...they have had that asshole swing vote that gave us Kelo....and other stupid decisions......
Even when you'd used the reply button in the post he or she complained about.What's this "we" shit? You [some user name I can't be bothered copying] are the only one complaining.
Spare_change
Gold Member
- Jun 27, 2011
- 8,690
- 1,293
- 280
Actually, it was a $12,495 jacket ... Hillary Clinton wore a $12,495 Armani jacket during a speech about inequality
Remember when Dems went crazy over Sarah Palin's wardrobe? What goes around ... comes around.
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,973
- 52,243
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #78
The problem is that Liberals actually HATE this country.
The country was founded by Liberals.
Lincoln was a liberal by today's standards.
No..that is a lie............the country was founded by Conservatives by today's standard..
Actually, the Conservatives supported the crown over supporting the people
Just like you would expect today
Nope....not the same people...the American conservative today was of the same belief as the Founders back then......it would be the socialists today who supported the Big Government of the Crown........
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,973
- 52,243
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #79
The problem is that Liberals actually HATE this country.
The country was founded by Liberals.
Lincoln was a liberal by today's standards.
No..that is a lie............the country was founded by Conservatives by today's standard..
the country, for anyone who actually knows anything about history, was founded by radicals and revolutionaries. by definition that is not conservative. you loons would have been tories.
you can look that up if you'd like
Wrong......they you guys keep applying the wrong beliefs to the wrong group....the Founders believe the same things as American Conservatives and Liberterians of today do..........you guys...would have been sucking on the nipple of the king like your lives depended on it......
Even when you'd used the reply button in the post he or she complained about.What's this "we" shit? You [some user name I can't be bothered copying] are the only one complaining.
I honestly haven't a clue what he/she/it is talking about.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 396
- Views
- 4K
- Replies
- 101
- Views
- 511
- Replies
- 44
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 160
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 88
- Views
- 909
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 363
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 29
- Views
- 174
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 13
- Replies
- 3K
- Views
- 36K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8068
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-