There must be regulation against outsourcing, hiring illegals, monopolies & in the case of media & Hollywood against biases.
Fascism therefor makes the most sense.
We can't continue on this way.
We already have laws against hiring illegals and monopolies. The rest are not controlled by the federal government in a free country.
Why should "Outsourcing" be tolerated by Americans?
The only thing you can give is "Freedom"
Everything else says it should NOT be tolerated.
It's costing us jobs.
It's costing us wages.
It's costing us tax base.
It's costing us product quality.
It's costing us pride.
Quite frankly I don't value freedom, freedom for who? Freedom for pedophiles? Freedom for those who pee down alleys? Freedom for drug dealers? Freedom for abortions? Freedom for hiring illegals? Freedom for transsexuals? freedom for outsourcing?
Thanks, but no thanks, I think I'll chose results, I care how good things become, not about freedom.
Any freedom that creates a worse society, is no friend of mine.
Then you may be in the wrong country.
How valuable is freedom? Valuable enough to have wars over, to risk life on a makeshift raft or being delivered in a crate in front of a trailer in 90 degree heat. Valuable enough to leave your original country, family and friends to start a new life in liberty. Valuable enough to wait years or decades to be part of freedom.
There are people in countries that would sacrifice their first born for a fraction of the freedom you and I are privileged to have. It’s just that we take it for granted. And while freedom has its negatives, it’s something most would never sacrifice for anything.
America was never a free Country for ALL.
In the first US election only 6% of the country were able to vote.
That's because ONLY White property owning men could vote.
There were also a ton of state regulations upon Corporations, from the Founding Fathers right up into nearly the 20th Century.
Here, check out the regulations Wisconsin had, similar to many states in 1873.
RACHEL #488: FIXING CORPORATIONS--PART 1: LEGACY OF THE FOUNDING PARENTS
** corporations were required to have a clear purpose, to be fulfilled but not exceeded.
[10]
** corporations' licenses to do business were revocable by the state legislature if they exceeded or did not fulfill their chartered purpose(s).
[11]
** the state legislature could revoke a corporation's charter for a particular reason, or for no reason at all.
[12]
** the act of incorporation did not relieve corporate management or stockholders/owners of responsibility or liability for corporate acts.
[13]
** as a matter of course, corporation officers, directors, or agents could be held criminally liable for violating the law.
[14]
** state (not federal) courts heard cases where corporations or their agents were accused of breaking the law or harming the public.
[15]
** directors of the corporation were required to come from among stockholders.
[16]
** corporations had to have their headquarters and meetings in the state where their principal place of business was located.
[17]
** corporation charters were granted for a specific period of time, like 20 or 30 years (instead of being granted "in perpetuity," as is now the practice.)
[18]
** corporations were prohibited from owning stock in other corporations in order to prevent them from extending their power inappropriately.
[19]
** corporations' real estate holdings were limited to what was necessary to carry out their specific purpose(s).
[20]
** corporations were prohibited from making any political contributions, direct or indirect.
[21]
** corporations were prohibited from making charitable or civic donations outside of their specific purposes.
[22]
** state legislatures set the rates that corporations could charge for their products or services.
[23]
** all corporation records and documents were open to the legislature or the state attorney general.
[24]
ALL OF THESE PROVISIONS WERE ONCE LAW IN THE STATE OF WISCONSIN And similar ones in most other states