There is no conclusion suggesed here, simply a question with possible answers.
1."As Justice Arthur Goldberg declared in a 1963 Supreme Court case, the Constitution 'is not a suicide pact. '"
Google.
2. AI Overview
Lincoln suspended habeas corpus to suppress dissent and maintain order during the Civil War, allowing the military to arrest and detain individuals deemed a threat to public safety without formal charges. This allowed authorities to silence pro-Confederate sympathizers, such as the "Copperheads," (Democrats) who opposed the war effort.
3. Article I, Section 9, Clause 2:
The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.
4. In the NYTimes today, we see the Democrat house organ publishing a huge article accusiing Trump of lawfare, never having offered the same attack on the orinators of lawfare, the Democrats.
5. “Bow to the emperor”: 50 legal experts on the Trump presidency
"Before the election, The New York Times Magazine surveyed 50 legal experts about what a second Trump term could mean for the rule of law.A year later, they're very, very worried."
Worried about Trump?
Do they have grounds?
If the Time's "legal experts" are worried about steps the Trump administration has taken, that echo what the Democrats did.....not including attempted assassinations.......should we consider Trump as a problem, or see his efforts, like Linconln's, as attempts to maintain America's traditional aims, values and heritage????
1."As Justice Arthur Goldberg declared in a 1963 Supreme Court case, the Constitution 'is not a suicide pact. '"
Google.
2. AI Overview
Lincoln suspended habeas corpus to suppress dissent and maintain order during the Civil War, allowing the military to arrest and detain individuals deemed a threat to public safety without formal charges. This allowed authorities to silence pro-Confederate sympathizers, such as the "Copperheads," (Democrats) who opposed the war effort.
3. Article I, Section 9, Clause 2:
The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.
4. In the NYTimes today, we see the Democrat house organ publishing a huge article accusiing Trump of lawfare, never having offered the same attack on the orinators of lawfare, the Democrats.
5. “Bow to the emperor”: 50 legal experts on the Trump presidency
"Before the election, The New York Times Magazine surveyed 50 legal experts about what a second Trump term could mean for the rule of law.A year later, they're very, very worried."
Worried about Trump?
Do they have grounds?
If the Time's "legal experts" are worried about steps the Trump administration has taken, that echo what the Democrats did.....not including attempted assassinations.......should we consider Trump as a problem, or see his efforts, like Linconln's, as attempts to maintain America's traditional aims, values and heritage????
Attachments
Last edited:
