If someone has advice on how to break through to trump fans I'm all ears.

What lies is Pirro telling? Can you name one specifically?

Where is the rationale or data that it is dangerous for law abiding citizens to carry a rifle or shotgun? The policy does not extend to those with criminal records that make it illegal to do that.
well he's a criminal lover, so those people scare him cause they might take out a criminal or two or three.
 
Pick up a book no;t published in America and ready how any opposition to the birth of the 3rd. Reich was quite impossible. America's teens and children will turn in their own parents for not accepting the regime.

We saw this with the left during Covid.
 
Sour grapes about the NYT being rewarded for the accuracy of their reporting does not indicate you have the kind of open mind it will take to acknowledge some of the hideous things the regime has done. Like nominating the eminently corrupt Emil Bove for an appeals court judgeship. This, after he instructed DoJ lawyers to ignore court orders.
The TDS uses the wrong cliche. It's the sour grapes by the NYT that's the issue. The Russian collusion story was based on faked and fraudulent documents. Everyone seems aware of it and yet the NYT refuses to return the Pulitzer.
 
We saw this with the left during Covid.
You can't help but notice how an isolated example as the regime was starting to be accepted, has become many times more common. Soon there will be no leftists to laugh at anymore!
 
I was struck by the revelations of text messages by Jeanine Pirro to Ronna McDaniel for two reasons. But first, here is what she wrote.

Ms. Pirro, a former Fox News host who is now the U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., told Ronna McDaniel, then the Republican National Committee chair, in a text in the months before the election: “I work so hard for the President and the party.” Ms. Pirro had been pushing for a pardon from Mr. Trump for her ex-husband, Smartmatic argues.

A weekend personality on Fox made her case for her ex-hubby's pardon by sending the message about how she used her position as a broadcaster to work for trump and the Repub party. Other text messages from other anchors show just how much Fox was in the tank for trump by fomenting the "stop the steal" lie. This, from a cable station many millions of conservatives rely on for accurate information to inform their opinions. The problem being, it isn't accurate.

As a quick aside, consider how radically different the political landscape would be if the Fox talking heads had done what they should have done, what the facts told them to do, acknowledge trump's defeat.

The second thing is Pirro was rewarded for her hard work shilling for trump by being nominated to be the US Attorney for DC. Replacing Ed Martin.......a man so corrupt even Senate Repubs refused to confirm him. Repubs had no problem confirming Pirro despite the obvious compromise of her ethics and lack of ability to make impartial prosecutorial decisions. A furtherance of the corruption of the judiciary by trump as a reward for Jeanine's loyalty.

Back to my original question. How can I get trump devotees to take the small step of recognizing Jeanine Pirro should not have been nominated, nor confirmed, to be DC's US Attorney in light of this unequivocal evidence? Because if you can, perhaps you can take the next step. Maybe look in to Ed Martin and why Repubs refused to confirm him. More importantly, ask yourselves how trump could have put him in a temporary role as US Attorney in the first place and then assigned him to work for the DoJ.

Then maybe, just maybe, you can take the final step. You can ask yourselves why being in agreement with trump on border security has translated to support of what happened to Andry Hernandez Romero. Or this...........

Father of 3 Marines Who Was Beaten by ICE Agents Released, Leaving Family to Process His Detention​


Or this.........

Judge calls Trump DOJ’s request to release Epstein grand jury records a ‘diversion’​


Or this.......

Trump says U.S. will not approve solar or wind power projects​


Or this.........

Trump vows to try banning mail-in voting before 2026 midterm elections — can he do that?​


this guy voted for the number one name caller, who had a nickname for all his opponents, and he’s telling us how ineffective name-calling is, despite the fact that Trump won twice
Ya know, I met a Conservative from Georgia when I was about 11.
She was sitting in a rocking chair outside a General Store in I think..Athens.
And she told me about what General Sherman did and was spittin' and doin' snuff..the old powdery kind, and sayin' "Damn Yankees" a lot. She was an old very black woman with white hair. I never forget that.
She was over 90..I think she was over 100. Her mind was still good, though.
 
I suppose when trump is reduced to a bloviating equivalent of a barstool crank. Which will require your participation and the participation of those like you. People who may agree with some of his policies but draw a line at things like nominating Pirro, or putting Martin in the DoJ, or continually trying to expand his power beyond constitutional limits.
I can tell you've been listening to CNN and MSNBC waaaay too much.

Cleaning up D.C. seems to you like expanding his power.

Problem with that is he's only acting within his legal authority.
 
Last edited:
Any chance I can get you to respond to the subject of the thread?

Back to my original question. How can I get trump devotees to take the small step of recognizing Jeanine Pirro should not have been nominated, nor confirmed, to be DC's US Attorney in light of this unequivocal evidence? Because if you can, perhaps you can take the next step. Maybe look in to Ed Martin and why Repubs refused to confirm him. More importantly, ask yourselves how trump could have put him in a temporary role as US Attorney in the first place and then assigned him to work for the DoJ.

You want advice on how to break through to Trump fans or you want feedback on Judge Jeanine?

How about the advice, quit being a dick.
 
I was struck by the revelations of text messages by Jeanine Pirro to Ronna McDaniel for two reasons. But first, here is what she wrote.

Ms. Pirro, a former Fox News host who is now the U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., told Ronna McDaniel, then the Republican National Committee chair, in a text in the months before the election: “I work so hard for the President and the party.” Ms. Pirro had been pushing for a pardon from Mr. Trump for her ex-husband, Smartmatic argues.

A weekend personality on Fox made her case for her ex-hubby's pardon by sending the message about how she used her position as a broadcaster to work for trump and the Repub party. Other text messages from other anchors show just how much Fox was in the tank for trump by fomenting the "stop the steal" lie. This, from a cable station many millions of conservatives rely on for accurate information to inform their opinions. The problem being, it isn't accurate.

As a quick aside, consider how radically different the political landscape would be if the Fox talking heads had done what they should have done, what the facts told them to do, acknowledge trump's defeat.

The second thing is Pirro was rewarded for her hard work shilling for trump by being nominated to be the US Attorney for DC. Replacing Ed Martin.......a man so corrupt even Senate Repubs refused to confirm him. Repubs had no problem confirming Pirro despite the obvious compromise of her ethics and lack of ability to make impartial prosecutorial decisions. A furtherance of the corruption of the judiciary by trump as a reward for Jeanine's loyalty.

Back to my original question. How can I get trump devotees to take the small step of recognizing Jeanine Pirro should not have been nominated, nor confirmed, to be DC's US Attorney in light of this unequivocal evidence? Because if you can, perhaps you can take the next step. Maybe look in to Ed Martin and why Repubs refused to confirm him. More importantly, ask yourselves how trump could have put him in a temporary role as US Attorney in the first place and then assigned him to work for the DoJ.

Then maybe, just maybe, you can take the final step. You can ask yourselves why being in agreement with trump on border security has translated to support of what happened to Andry Hernandez Romero. Or this...........

Father of 3 Marines Who Was Beaten by ICE Agents Released, Leaving Family to Process His Detention​


Or this.........

Judge calls Trump DOJ’s request to release Epstein grand jury records a ‘diversion’​


Or this.......

Trump says U.S. will not approve solar or wind power projects​


Or this.........

Trump vows to try banning mail-in voting before 2026 midterm elections — can he do that?​

When you partisan stupidity is always soundly rejected by the people you apparently seek to persuade, it might dawn on you (yes, even a dolt like you) that the problem isn’t with the “other side.”

The problem is with you and the nonsense you’re always seeking to peddle. Sorry, lil bug, but you’re just a mindless hyper-partisan troll with no credibility of any kind.
 
Last edited:
What lies is Pirro telling? Can you name one specifically?

Where is the rationale or data that it is dangerous for law abiding citizens to carry a rifle or shotgun? The policy does not extend to those with criminal records that make it illegal to do that.
She was all over the election lies in 2020.

 
15th post
Trolling. Trolling. Trolling.

Newsom is making fun of Trump. It’s hilarious.
America has rejected your Cult’s ORANGE MAN BAD platform.

Try coming up with some ideas for America, Moroner.
 
Back
Top Bottom