- Jun 22, 2020
- 23,178
- 26,374
- 2,288
A rather long-winded dodge there. Care to answer the question posed or are we in for more irrelevant filibustering?
If someone has advice on how to break through to trump fans I'm all ears.
- Thread starter berg80
- Start date
Oh yeah. Posting hyper partisan dishonest propaganda pieces is sure to win over Trump fans. NOT!! I'm assuming you're posting excerpts accurately as I can't get past the NYT paywall.I was struck by the revelations of text messages by Jeanine Pirro to Ronna McDaniel for two reasons. But first, here is what she wrote.
Ms. Pirro, a former Fox News host who is now the U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., told Ronna McDaniel, then the Republican National Committee chair, in a text in the months before the election: “I work so hard for the President and the party.” Ms. Pirro had been pushing for a pardon from Mr. Trump for her ex-husband, Smartmatic argues.
A weekend personality on Fox made her case for her ex-hubby's pardon by sending the message about how she used her position as a broadcaster to work for trump and the Repub party. Other text messages from other anchors show just how much Fox was in the tank for trump by fomenting the "stop the steal" lie. This, from a cable station many millions of conservatives rely on for accurate information to inform their opinions. The problem being, it isn't accurate.
As a quick aside, consider how radically different the political landscape would be if the Fox talking heads had done what they should have done, what the facts told them to do, acknowledge trump's defeat.
The second thing is Pirro was rewarded for her hard work shilling for trump by being nominated to be the US Attorney for DC. Replacing Ed Martin.......a man so corrupt even Senate Repubs refused to confirm him. Repubs had no problem confirming Pirro despite the obvious compromise of her ethics and lack of ability to make impartial prosecutorial decisions. A furtherance of the corruption of the judiciary by trump as a reward for Jeanine's loyalty.
Back to my original question. How can I get trump devotees to take the small step of recognizing Jeanine Pirro should not have been nominated, nor confirmed, to be DC's US Attorney in light of this unequivocal evidence? Because if you can, perhaps you can take the next step. Maybe look in to Ed Martin and why Repubs refused to confirm him. More importantly, ask yourselves how trump could have put him in a temporary role as US Attorney in the first place and then assigned him to work for the DoJ.
Then maybe, just maybe, you can take the final step. You can ask yourselves why being in agreement with trump on border security has translated to support of what happened to Andry Hernandez Romero. Or this...........
Father of 3 Marines Who Was Beaten by ICE Agents Released, Leaving Family to Process His Detention
Or this.........
Judge calls Trump DOJ’s request to release Epstein grand jury records a ‘diversion’
Or this.......
Trump says U.S. will not approve solar or wind power projects
Or this.........
Trump vows to try banning mail-in voting before 2026 midterm elections — can he do that?
Trump vows to try banning mail-in voting before 2026 midterm elections — can he do that?
President Trump says he plans to sign an executive order "to end mail-in ballots, because they're corrupt." Here's what to know about his claims.www.cbsnews.com
Jeannine Pirro hasn't been on Fox on weekends for years now but was a permanent member of their flagship and highly rated program "The Five" until her appointment as U.S. Attorney for D.C. Her ex husband received a pardon from President Trump in his first term as President.
Attack ICE officers with a weed whacker and it won't end well.
What else are demands for release of Epstein files other than a diversion? You lefties didn't want to see them when Biden had them. Acknowledging that would go a long way to winning over Trump supporters.
Accepting that trillions of dollars in green energy as well as all the rules and regulations and mandates all eroding liberties, choices, options, opportunities is not reasonable when there is zero evidence any of that has made one whit's difference in climate change would go a long way to winning over Trump supporters. Agreeing that if wind and solar can't make it without federal subsidies, then maybe they aren't all that great after all would help win over Trump supporters.
Acknowledging that mail in voting and electronic voting machines does offer much more opportunity to cheat elections and erodes confidence in the system would go a long way to winning over Trump supporters. Honorable people understand that the American people must have confidence that their vote will count and will count as they voted in order to trust the system. Any steps taken to accomplish that are appreciated by honorable people. And supporting that would help win over Trump supporters.
Getting on board with the MAGA vision of a strong, free, secure, prosperous, law abiding America with maximum reasonable choices, options, opportunity, and prosperity for all citizens without regard to race, ethnicity, religion, country, gender, country of origin would win over Trump supporters.
Last edited:
- Jun 22, 2020
- 23,178
- 26,374
- 2,288
That’ll hurt his chances of reelection, for sure. In the meantime: winning!
blackhawk
Diamond Member
Try acting like a normal rational person with basic common sense and stop the endless TDS trolling threads if you want anyone outside of your far left Trump obsessed brethren to take anything you post or say seriously.
BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 58,696
- 17,633
- 2,250
I'm pretty sure Gavin was send by God the Father for an epic battle of good verse evil in Donnie "The Demon Spawn" Trump
Oh wait that's the Holy GOP trinity there in that meme, never mind.
Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 61,050
- 25,594
- 2,173
You don’t understand the difference between imitation and satire.
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 158,872
- 39,271
- 2,180
I voted three times for trump now. what's your point exactly? Who'd you vote for?
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 158,872
- 39,271
- 2,180
irony
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 33,776
- 27,513
- 2,820
- Thread starter
- #151
Help me out. How does Pirro spewing right wing propaganda and lies on "The Five," Faux being a network with admitted right wing propagandists, qualify her to be nominated for the position of US Attorney? Or is it more likely she was being rewarded for her sycophancy to trump after lying her ass off to get her ex pardoned.
Any thoughts about this monumentally stupid policy change?
WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal prosecutors in the nation’s capital will no longer bring felony charges against people for possessing rifles or shotguns in the District of Columbia, according to a new policy adopted by the leader of the nation’s largest U.S. attorney’s office.
That office will continue to pursue charges when someone is accused of using a shotgun or rifle in a violent crime or has a criminal record that makes it illegal to have a firearm. Local authorities in Washington can prosecute people for illegally possessing unregistered rifles and shotguns.
US attorney will no longer bring felony charges against people for carrying rifles or shotguns in DC
Federal prosecutors in the nation’s capital will no longer bring felony charges against people for possessing rifles or shotguns in the District of Columbia.
apnews.com
Concerned American
Diamond Member
You clearly don't understand your own ignorance.
Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 61,050
- 25,594
- 2,173
Trolling. Trolling. Trolling.
Newsom is making fun of Trump. It’s hilarious.
C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
Further proof Trump is unfit to be president.I was struck by the revelations of text messages by Jeanine Pirro to Ronna McDaniel for two reasons. But first, here is what she wrote.
Ms. Pirro, a former Fox News host who is now the U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., told Ronna McDaniel, then the Republican National Committee chair, in a text in the months before the election: “I work so hard for the President and the party.” Ms. Pirro had been pushing for a pardon from Mr. Trump for her ex-husband, Smartmatic argues.
A weekend personality on Fox made her case for her ex-hubby's pardon by sending the message about how she used her position as a broadcaster to work for trump and the Repub party. Other text messages from other anchors show just how much Fox was in the tank for trump by fomenting the "stop the steal" lie. This, from a cable station many millions of conservatives rely on for accurate information to inform their opinions. The problem being, it isn't accurate.
As a quick aside, consider how radically different the political landscape would be if the Fox talking heads had done what they should have done, what the facts told them to do, acknowledge trump's defeat.
The second thing is Pirro was rewarded for her hard work shilling for trump by being nominated to be the US Attorney for DC. Replacing Ed Martin.......a man so corrupt even Senate Repubs refused to confirm him. Repubs had no problem confirming Pirro despite the obvious compromise of her ethics and lack of ability to make impartial prosecutorial decisions. A furtherance of the corruption of the judiciary by trump as a reward for Jeanine's loyalty.
Back to my original question. How can I get trump devotees to take the small step of recognizing Jeanine Pirro should not have been nominated, nor confirmed, to be DC's US Attorney in light of this unequivocal evidence? Because if you can, perhaps you can take the next step. Maybe look in to Ed Martin and why Repubs refused to confirm him. More importantly, ask yourselves how trump could have put him in a temporary role as US Attorney in the first place and then assigned him to work for the DoJ.
Then maybe, just maybe, you can take the final step. You can ask yourselves why being in agreement with trump on border security has translated to support of what happened to Andry Hernandez Romero. Or this...........
Father of 3 Marines Who Was Beaten by ICE Agents Released, Leaving Family to Process His Detention
Or this.........
Judge calls Trump DOJ’s request to release Epstein grand jury records a ‘diversion’
Or this.......
Trump says U.S. will not approve solar or wind power projects
Or this.........
Trump vows to try banning mail-in voting before 2026 midterm elections — can he do that?
Trump vows to try banning mail-in voting before 2026 midterm elections — can he do that?
President Trump says he plans to sign an executive order "to end mail-in ballots, because they're corrupt." Here's what to know about his claims.
Yet Democrats approval is worse than Trump's. Chew on that TDS boy.
Pick up a book no;t published in America and ready how any opposition to the birth of the 3rd. Reich was quite impossible. America's teens and children will turn in their own parents for not accepting the regime.I was struck by the revelations of text messages by Jeanine Pirro to Ronna McDaniel for two reasons. But first, here is what she wrote.
Ms. Pirro, a former Fox News host who is now the U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., told Ronna McDaniel, then the Republican National Committee chair, in a text in the months before the election: “I work so hard for the President and the party.” Ms. Pirro had been pushing for a pardon from Mr. Trump for her ex-husband, Smartmatic argues.
A weekend personality on Fox made her case for her ex-hubby's pardon by sending the message about how she used her position as a broadcaster to work for trump and the Repub party. Other text messages from other anchors show just how much Fox was in the tank for trump by fomenting the "stop the steal" lie. This, from a cable station many millions of conservatives rely on for accurate information to inform their opinions. The problem being, it isn't accurate.
As a quick aside, consider how radically different the political landscape would be if the Fox talking heads had done what they should have done, what the facts told them to do, acknowledge trump's defeat.
The second thing is Pirro was rewarded for her hard work shilling for trump by being nominated to be the US Attorney for DC. Replacing Ed Martin.......a man so corrupt even Senate Repubs refused to confirm him. Repubs had no problem confirming Pirro despite the obvious compromise of her ethics and lack of ability to make impartial prosecutorial decisions. A furtherance of the corruption of the judiciary by trump as a reward for Jeanine's loyalty.
Back to my original question. How can I get trump devotees to take the small step of recognizing Jeanine Pirro should not have been nominated, nor confirmed, to be DC's US Attorney in light of this unequivocal evidence? Because if you can, perhaps you can take the next step. Maybe look in to Ed Martin and why Repubs refused to confirm him. More importantly, ask yourselves how trump could have put him in a temporary role as US Attorney in the first place and then assigned him to work for the DoJ.
Then maybe, just maybe, you can take the final step. You can ask yourselves why being in agreement with trump on border security has translated to support of what happened to Andry Hernandez Romero. Or this...........
Father of 3 Marines Who Was Beaten by ICE Agents Released, Leaving Family to Process His Detention
Or this.........
Judge calls Trump DOJ’s request to release Epstein grand jury records a ‘diversion’
Or this.......
Trump says U.S. will not approve solar or wind power projects
Or this.........
Trump vows to try banning mail-in voting before 2026 midterm elections — can he do that?
Trump vows to try banning mail-in voting before 2026 midterm elections — can he do that?
President Trump says he plans to sign an executive order "to end mail-in ballots, because they're corrupt." Here's what to know about his claims.
Concerned American
Diamond Member
Thanks for the admission. I didn't rattle your chain.
LAUGHatLEFTISTS
Diamond Member
- Jan 22, 2020
- 20,114
- 18,419
- 2,290
Nope. Obama wasn’t qualified to be president and it showed.
*Biden is a life long failure and it showed.
What lies is Pirro telling? Can you name one specifically?Help me out. How does Pirro spewing right wing propaganda and lies on "The Five," Faux being a network with admitted right wing propagandists, qualify her to be nominated for the position of US Attorney? Or is it more likely she was being rewarded for her sycophancy to trump after lying her ass off to get her ex pardoned.
Any thoughts about this monumentally stupid policy change?
WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal prosecutors in the nation’s capital will no longer bring felony charges against people for possessing rifles or shotguns in the District of Columbia, according to a new policy adopted by the leader of the nation’s largest U.S. attorney’s office.
That office will continue to pursue charges when someone is accused of using a shotgun or rifle in a violent crime or has a criminal record that makes it illegal to have a firearm. Local authorities in Washington can prosecute people for illegally possessing unregistered rifles and shotguns.
US attorney will no longer bring felony charges against people for carrying rifles or shotguns in DC
Federal prosecutors in the nation’s capital will no longer bring felony charges against people for possessing rifles or shotguns in the District of Columbia.
Where is the rationale or data that it is dangerous for law abiding citizens to carry a rifle or shotgun? The policy does not extend to those with criminal records that make it illegal to do that.
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 158,872
- 39,271
- 2,180
newsome looks the fool
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Trump Drops New Ultimatum: Fund DHS or ICE Moves Into Airports- Started by Doc7505
- Replies: 0
-
Trump to Deploy "Surge" ICE Agents to Airports for Security Operations- Started by Seymour Flops
- Replies: 1
-
Man used ChatGPT to sell his home in five days....Five offers in 72 hours- Started by 1srelluc
- Replies: 0
-
Zone1 Zero background, then an NDE, and voila a Christian Literary Genius like C. S. Lewis?- Started by DennisPTate
- Replies: 0
-
39 trillion dollars and climbing. If the FED doesnt lower interest rates, the United States will be no more.- Started by Mikeoxenormous
- Replies: 1
