A mandate is a mandate.
Whether it is a state mandate or a federal mandate, is the result not exactly the same?
If you believe it is OK for the state to implement a mandate...why would you oppose the same at the federal level?
It's ridicules.
Allow me to put this another way.
If Obama was governor of your state, and congress was the legislative body of your state, and they instituted Obamacare, that would have made it totally acceptable to you...because it was your state forcing you to purchase their state-mandated government healthcare?
And if all 50 states instituted state-mandated healthcare, no problem there either...it's all good, as long as is not a
federal government mandate...right?
I mean the result is exactly the same, but we shouldn't complain as long as Obamacare is installed at the state level one state at a time.