Zone1 If Kyle Rittenhouse Was Black

Status
Not open for further replies.
You fuckers are so FOS! Some big mouth asshole approaches you with a gun and what are you gonna do? Shake his hand? Trying to take some pussys' weapon away, is not deadly force!

You fuckers are so FOS! Some big mouth asshole approaches you with a gun and what are you gonna do?

I'd back away slowly.

Trying to take some pussys' weapon away, is not deadly force!

It's deadly stupid.
 
It is a fact settled, accepted, and beyond dispute that there is a double standard in the treatment of Americans of color by police – with Americans of color disproportionally ending up dead.

That conservatives have made a ‘hero’ out of the likes of Rittenhouse comes as no surprise.

with Americans of color disproportionally ending up dead.

Show your math.
 
You cannot attack with lethal force if you have no weapon.
Yees you absolutely can.

There is more than one way to do so and one very cear way is to attempt to take the other person's weapon which is what Rosenbaymm did.

That was by definition a lethal threat with lethal intent and Rittenhouse was morally and legallly justified in shooting Rosenbaum

You are consistently wrong and dishonest
 
It is a fact settled, accepted, and beyond dispute that there is a double standard in the treatment of Americans of color by police – with Americans of color disproportionally ending up dead.

That conservatives have made a ‘hero’ out of the likes of Rittenhouse comes as no surprise.
No it is not a fact accepted or otherwise it is a racist ideological belief held byu the left and blm
 
Yees you absolutely can.

There is more than one way to do so and one very cear way is to attempt to take the other person's weapon which is what Rosenbaymm did.

That was by definition a lethal threat with lethal intent and Rittenhouse was morally and legallly justified in shooting Rosenbaum

You are consistently wrong and dishonest
Rittenhouse was looking for trouble. That's why he was there. The guy in the OP faced a threat, but he got 10 years. Rittenhouse was no police officer, so trying to take his gun was no threat.
 
Rittenhouse was looking for trouble. That's why he was there. The guy in the OP faced a threat, but he got 10 years. Rittenhouse was no police officer, so trying to take his gun was no threat.
Wrong.

The two cases are apples and oranges.

Trying to take an armed person's weapon is a lethal threat and that is not limited to police
 
Rittenhouse was looking for trouble. That's why he was there. The guy in the OP faced a threat, but he got 10 years. Rittenhouse was no police officer, so trying to take his gun was no threat.
And all the BLM savages who descended upon city after city, for month after month, to burn down buildings, destroy innocent people’s personal property, assault people with abandon, commit 30 murders, etc., etc., were NOT looking for trouble?

The racist leftists have more disgust for an innocent, and admittedly naive, teenager who thought he could protect his friend’s business from the BLM animals than the BLM animals themselves. You won’t even condemn the five-time child rapist ex-con who showed up “looking for trouble.”

The main problem with leftists is: THEY ALWAYS DEFEND THE WRONG PEOPLE.
 
Rittenhouse was looking for trouble. That's why he was there. The guy in the OP faced a threat, but he got 10 years. Rittenhouse was no police officer, so trying to take his gun was no threat.
P.S. If a BLM savage approaches me to take my gun, after earlier threatening to kill me, yes….he is a threat. I have a right to blast his brains into the next county, and no jury would ever convict me, unless it was comprised of twelve anti-white IM2s.

You are so biased that no matter what BLM savages do, you defend them.
 
You don't get to kill people and walk away free.

Unlike Kyle Rittenhouse, Black People Can't Argue "Stand Your Ground," Attorney says​


William ‘Marc’ Wilson, a biracial Black man, was convicted of involuntary manslaughter for shooting at a group of teens racially attacking him and his family on the highway. Wilson argued the shooting was in self-defense but his attorneys say that the “stand your ground” laws in Georgia are racially biased toward Black people, according to Yahoo! News.

View attachment 699285

In June 2020, at the height of racial tension in the country, Wilson fired his handgun at a group of white teens in a truck who were shouting slurs and trying to run Wilson and his family off the road. One of those bullets killed a 17-year-old in the back seat, reports say.

According to Georgia law, a person is justified in using force if they believe that said force is necessary to defend themselves.


For those who don't understand, this is an example of systemic racism.
If Kyle Rittenhouse was black, he would behave like a wild animal. The stand you ground laws, along with all the laws, are biased against people who act like wild animals.
 
Yees you absolutely can.

There is more than one way to do so and one very cear way is to attempt to take the other person's weapon which is what Rosenbaymm did.

That was by definition a lethal threat with lethal intent and Rittenhouse was morally and legallly justified in shooting Rosenbaum

You are consistently wrong and dishonest
Rittenhouse brought a weapon to a protest just looking for trouble and wanting to exacerbate the situation. He wasn't defending Jack shit!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top