Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
You cannot have lethal force without a lethal weapon!
Like a skateboard.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You cannot have lethal force without a lethal weapon!
You fuckers are so FOS! Some big mouth asshole approaches you with a gun and what are you gonna do? Shake his hand? Trying to take some pussys' weapon away, is not deadly force!
Bullshit! Rittenpussy brought a firearm to a protest about shooting unarmed people of color. He went looking for a fight and murdered two unarmed pedestrians.
It is a fact settled, accepted, and beyond dispute that there is a double standard in the treatment of Americans of color by police – with Americans of color disproportionally ending up dead.
That conservatives have made a ‘hero’ out of the likes of Rittenhouse comes as no surprise.
Yees you absolutely can.You cannot attack with lethal force if you have no weapon.
yes it is and you know it is you lying racist trash bagFuck you, it is not!
No it is not a fact accepted or otherwise it is a racist ideological belief held byu the left and blmIt is a fact settled, accepted, and beyond dispute that there is a double standard in the treatment of Americans of color by police – with Americans of color disproportionally ending up dead.
That conservatives have made a ‘hero’ out of the likes of Rittenhouse comes as no surprise.
It's a fact shown by documentation.No it is not a fact accepted or otherwise it is a racist ideological belief held byu the left and blm
Rittenhouse was looking for trouble. That's why he was there. The guy in the OP faced a threat, but he got 10 years. Rittenhouse was no police officer, so trying to take his gun was no threat.Yees you absolutely can.
There is more than one way to do so and one very cear way is to attempt to take the other person's weapon which is what Rosenbaymm did.
That was by definition a lethal threat with lethal intent and Rittenhouse was morally and legallly justified in shooting Rosenbaum
You are consistently wrong and dishonest
It is a racisty annd ideological belief and nothing more.It's a fact shown by documentation.
Wrong.Rittenhouse was looking for trouble. That's why he was there. The guy in the OP faced a threat, but he got 10 years. Rittenhouse was no police officer, so trying to take his gun was no threat.
And all the BLM savages who descended upon city after city, for month after month, to burn down buildings, destroy innocent people’s personal property, assault people with abandon, commit 30 murders, etc., etc., were NOT looking for trouble?Rittenhouse was looking for trouble. That's why he was there. The guy in the OP faced a threat, but he got 10 years. Rittenhouse was no police officer, so trying to take his gun was no threat.
P.S. If a BLM savage approaches me to take my gun, after earlier threatening to kill me, yes….he is a threat. I have a right to blast his brains into the next county, and no jury would ever convict me, unless it was comprised of twelve anti-white IM2s.Rittenhouse was looking for trouble. That's why he was there. The guy in the OP faced a threat, but he got 10 years. Rittenhouse was no police officer, so trying to take his gun was no threat.
If Kyle Rittenhouse was black, he would behave like a wild animal. The stand you ground laws, along with all the laws, are biased against people who act like wild animals.You don't get to kill people and walk away free.
Unlike Kyle Rittenhouse, Black People Can't Argue "Stand Your Ground," Attorney says
William ‘Marc’ Wilson, a biracial Black man, was convicted of involuntary manslaughter for shooting at a group of teens racially attacking him and his family on the highway. Wilson argued the shooting was in self-defense but his attorneys say that the “stand your ground” laws in Georgia are racially biased toward Black people, according to Yahoo! News.
View attachment 699285
In June 2020, at the height of racial tension in the country, Wilson fired his handgun at a group of white teens in a truck who were shouting slurs and trying to run Wilson and his family off the road. One of those bullets killed a 17-year-old in the back seat, reports say.
According to Georgia law, a person is justified in using force if they believe that said force is necessary to defend themselves.
MSN
www.msn.com
For those who don't understand, this is an example of systemic racism.
But isn't this a zone 1 thread, my Gy friend?you are all 3 and prove it in every thread I have seen you in.
Okay.Shouldn't assault a person with your skateboard.
Huber didn't witness anything.
you think zone 1 protects you from us pointing out just how stupid you are?But isn't this a zone 1 thread, my Gy friend?
Rittenhouse brought a weapon to a protest just looking for trouble and wanting to exacerbate the situation. He wasn't defending Jack shit!Yees you absolutely can.
There is more than one way to do so and one very cear way is to attempt to take the other person's weapon which is what Rosenbaymm did.
That was by definition a lethal threat with lethal intent and Rittenhouse was morally and legallly justified in shooting Rosenbaum
You are consistently wrong and dishonest