If Graham-Cassidy isn't a purely partisan healthcare bill, I don't know what is

[busybee01]

Take a look at the "winners and losers" by state if the Graham-Cassidy plan for gutting O-care passes.

By and large, there are a few exceptions, what the bill does is reduce funding to places where larger quantities of people live and increase it in places where fewer people live. It also "conveniently" happens that the lower population areas that will see increased funding are also "red states." (Though Trump won PA, MI, and WI, on the basis of one election cycle, it's hard to consider them "red" more so than, at best, "purple." That's why I used the 2012 "party" map.)

Who is it that's always complaining about redistributions of income and resources? I'll bet "dollars to donuts" those very same people don't much mind redistribution when it benefits their locality.

Interesting, since the CBO has not scored it yet.

The Republicans don't want a CBO score because they know what the result will be. More people losing coverage.

there is no way to get a positive CBO score. what is the CBO score with the failing obummerfail? it's all guesses. wow. about 25 million without coverage today? yep

BTW, before obummerfail only 12% were without coverage. it got worse under obummerfail. what did the CBO call out back then?

Bullshit. More people got covered under Obamacare. It did not get worse. Quite lying.

 

[usmbguest5318]

the problem with obamacare is the young healthy person pays for the 40 year old cancer patient. healthy people pay for folks who are sick.

Be that as it may, this thread isn't about O-care. It's about the Graham-Cassidy bill. Have you something of substance to say about the Graham-Cassidy bill?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

the problem with obamacare is the young healthy person pays for the 40 year old cancer patient. healthy people pay for folks who are sick.

Be that as it may, this thread isn't about O-care. It's about the Graham-Cassidy bill. Have you something of substance to say about the Graham-Cassidy bill?

Anything would be better than OhbummerCare.

 

[Mac1958]

The Republicans continue to just BEG for Single Payer.

 

[usmbguest5318]

the problem with obamacare is the young healthy person pays for the 40 year old cancer patient. healthy people pay for folks who are sick.

Be that as it may, this thread isn't about O-care. It's about the Graham-Cassidy bill. Have you something of substance to say about the Graham-Cassidy bill?

Anything would be better than OhbummerCare.

One something I would be okay with just outright eliminating health insurance.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

the problem with obamacare is the young healthy person pays for the 40 year old cancer patient. healthy people pay for folks who are sick.

Be that as it may, this thread isn't about O-care. It's about the Graham-Cassidy bill. Have you something of substance to say about the Graham-Cassidy bill?

Anything would be better than OhbummerCare.

One something I would be okay with just outright eliminating health insurance.

Yeah, great idea! Until you need it!

 

[usmbguest5318]

the problem with obamacare is the young healthy person pays for the 40 year old cancer patient. healthy people pay for folks who are sick.

Be that as it may, this thread isn't about O-care. It's about the Graham-Cassidy bill. Have you something of substance to say about the Graham-Cassidy bill?

Anything would be better than OhbummerCare.

One something I would be okay with just outright eliminating health insurance.

Yeah, great idea! Until you need it!

It works for me either way, need care or not. Do you really think I made that statement without considering what it entailed?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

the problem with obamacare is the young healthy person pays for the 40 year old cancer patient. healthy people pay for folks who are sick.

Be that as it may, this thread isn't about O-care. It's about the Graham-Cassidy bill. Have you something of substance to say about the Graham-Cassidy bill?

Anything would be better than OhbummerCare.

One something I would be okay with just outright eliminating health insurance.

Yeah, great idea! Until you need it!

It works for me either way, need care or not. Do you really think I made that statement without considering what it entailed?

Judging from your past performance and tons of evidence that you never think things through, absolutely!

 

[usmbguest5318]

the problem with obamacare is the young healthy person pays for the 40 year old cancer patient. healthy people pay for folks who are sick.

Be that as it may, this thread isn't about O-care. It's about the Graham-Cassidy bill. Have you something of substance to say about the Graham-Cassidy bill?

Anything would be better than OhbummerCare.

One something I would be okay with just outright eliminating health insurance.

Yeah, great idea! Until you need it!

It works for me either way, need care or not. Do you really think I made that statement without considering what it entailed?

Judging from your past performance and tons of evidence that you never think things through, absolutely!

Well, you just keep thinking that....

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

the problem with obamacare is the young healthy person pays for the 40 year old cancer patient. healthy people pay for folks who are sick.

Be that as it may, this thread isn't about O-care. It's about the Graham-Cassidy bill. Have you something of substance to say about the Graham-Cassidy bill?

Anything would be better than OhbummerCare.

One something I would be okay with just outright eliminating health insurance.

Yeah, great idea! Until you need it!

It works for me either way, need care or not. Do you really think I made that statement without considering what it entailed?

Judging from your past performance and tons of evidence that you never think things through, absolutely!

Well, you just keep thinking that....

You would be just like a Christian Scientist with appendicitis!

 

[NYcarbineer]

The Repubs are now trying to buy off Murkowski with EXEMPTIONS for Alaska.

Alaska could get relief from Senate repeal bill's Medicaid cuts

 

[Freewill]

Take a look at the "winners and losers" by state if the Graham-Cassidy plan for gutting O-care passes.

By and large, there are a few exceptions, what the bill does is reduce funding to places where larger quantities of people live and increase it in places where fewer people live. It also "conveniently" happens that the lower population areas that will see increased funding are also "red states." (Though Trump won PA, MI, and WI, on the basis of one election cycle, it's hard to consider them "red" more so than, at best, "purple." That's why I used the 2012 "party" map.)

Who is it that's always complaining about redistributions of income and resources? I'll bet "dollars to donuts" those very same people don't much mind redistribution when it benefits their locality.

That is really funny, you saying you don't know what a totally partisan bill is. IT'S OBAMACARE!!!!! Wow, bought and paid for by democrat pork passed in the middle of the night through strong arm tactics, THAT is partisan.

 

[Freewill]

The Repubs are now trying to buy off Murkowski with EXEMPTIONS for Alaska.

Alaska could get relief from Senate repeal bill's Medicaid cuts

Sounds a little like the Corn Husker kickbacks. It is hilarious that the left will scream about deals being made when one only has to look at how Obamacare passed in the first place.

 

[Freewill]

If Graham-Cassidy isn't a purely partisan...

You say that like it's a bad thing.

Insofar as it's legislation that directly affects individual's access to healthcare and/or their ability to pay for either health insurance or health care, it is. There is nothing ethically right about being partisan on such matters.

Did you not just describe Obamacare?

 

[dblack]

The Democrats expand the power of government, and the Republicans show us why it's a bad idea.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The Repubs are now trying to buy off Murkowski with EXEMPTIONS for Alaska.

Alaska could get relief from Senate repeal bill's Medicaid cuts

Sounds a little like the Corn Husker kickbacks. It is hilarious that the left will scream about deals being made when one only has to look at how Obamacare passed in the first place.

What's funny is you opposing one and supporting the other.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The Democrats expand the power of government, and the Republicans show us why it's a bad idea.

Other than to simply let them go without, what's your solution to providing healthcare to those who can't afford it at free market prices?

 

[fncceo]

what's your solution to providing healthcare to those who can't afford it at free market prices?

Means tested Medicare. Same as student aid.

 

[dudmuck]

The Democrats expand the power of government, and the Republicans show us why it's a bad idea.

Other than to simply let them go without, what's your solution to providing healthcare to those who can't afford it at free market prices?

to those who can afford it at Oligopoly Pricing.

 

[usmbguest5318]

Take a look at the "winners and losers" by state if the Graham-Cassidy plan for gutting O-care passes.

By and large, there are a few exceptions, what the bill does is reduce funding to places where larger quantities of people live and increase it in places where fewer people live. It also "conveniently" happens that the lower population areas that will see increased funding are also "red states." (Though Trump won PA, MI, and WI, on the basis of one election cycle, it's hard to consider them "red" more so than, at best, "purple." That's why I used the 2012 "party" map.)

Who is it that's always complaining about redistributions of income and resources? I'll bet "dollars to donuts" those very same people don't much mind redistribution when it benefits their locality.

That is really funny, you saying you don't know what a totally partisan bill is. IT'S OBAMACARE!!!!! Wow, bought and paid for by democrat pork passed in the middle of the night through strong arm tactics, THAT is partisan.

That is really funny, you saying you don't know what a totally partisan bill is.

Insofar as you think that's what I said, I haven't more to say to you on this thread topic because that is not at all what I said or implied.