If Fords testimony is true...

[Aldo Raine]

And some said they don't even remember any such party. How could it have happened if the party never existed?

It happened in her imagination 35 years later. Of course she's just like the rest of us. We cant remember what years we went to high school or college. But anyway....back to the story. Her shrink was able to reach into alice in wonderland and conjure up this lurid tale from the deep recesses of fords brain. And voila.........it was true.

So your saying you have no idea what happened, thank you.

Right because the accusations are so vague and baseless, no one knows what happened, nor can it even be investigated more than it has been. Because all the witnesses say “nope don’t remember anything of the sort,”...and Ford and her legal team opt to selectively offer up portions of their “evidence”. On top of that Ford has already been caught lying about the origin one of those sources of evidence, and the other she’s alleged to be lying about by her former boyfriend of 6 years. That boyfriend mentions Fords friend (that she coached on polygraphs, then allegedly lied about), who also is the same friend pressuring Fords best friend from high school to change her testimony. How long are y’all gonna keep the charade up?

So her ex boyfriend, he said she said lol.

It’s not just him, it’s ALL the witnesses she cited too. And we have the permits showing the addition to her house was 4 years prior to the therapy session, for her in-home practice as well as a room to rent out to tenants. So the whole “we went to therapy because my husband just couldn’t understand me wanting a second front door, because of my fear of only having a single exit” was a lie. We also have the text messages of Fords party trying to convince witnesses to change their testimony.

The whole point here is that it is a he said she said. Allegations alone cannot be the standard we stand on for obvious reasons, not without corroborating evidence or a preponderance of evidence. The she said part is unraveling. The witnesses she has cited do not corroborate, and even flat out contradict her testimony. She offers no date, no time, no place, no other details outside of Kavanaugh did it, and I got away, so it’s impossible for Kavanaugh to dispute her testimony, outside of it being a he said she said. We (including the FBI) can only go off of her testimony. The only other evidence ford offers up outside of the witnesses that do not corroborate, she will not release in entirety. The FBI has interviewed the cited witnesses. The only one hindering the FBI investigation is Ford by withholding the rest of her evidence that hasn’t been flushed down the drain.

So I’ll ask again, why is it not important to you that she doesn’t just release that? Are you capable of not deflecting?

So you are saying she lied, but are happy with Bart's lies, duly noted.

 

[Aldo Raine]

You say she is a liar, let's catch her lying again. You got a problem with that? Because I would love for Kavvy to tell more lies to the FBI !

why do they need to talk to her exactly?

To prove her lies and prosecute if necessary. Kavvy as well!

She's the accuser. Its on her to provide the evidence. She lied and couldnt produce anything.

Then let her lie to the FBI, if they can prove she lied prosecute her.

She has no recollections, so there was nothing to investigate. The FBI has nothing to work with. But this never had anything to do with any of that. None of her alleged witnesses backed up her story. Even her former paramour said he never heard anything.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I wanted her interviewed so she would lie to the FBI and then she could be prosecuted. This is now about the 101st time it has been stated in this thread.

 

[gipper]

Why would you be upset about the government withholding documents?

Was that question rhetorical?

They have been doing this for decades. BO claimed he would have the most transparent administration (LIE!!!!!!), but he had the least transparent. Hell...they are still withholding JFK documents.

I disagree BO had the least, but I do agree with everything else you stated.

Government sucks. It always sucks...and it exists to allow the elites to run things and enrich themselves.

The government is a reflection of us. If there is corruption in government, it is because there is corruption in our own lives. It's our fault we got the government we have.

At any rate, this is all a made up issue to prevent Trump his nominee. Nothing about this relates to Kavy. The Ds think they will get congress in November, then they will proceed to impeach and remove Trump. Then we will get a warmongering empty suit establishment asshole in Pence. Oh well....same shit different day.

It's not a made up issue and a lot of it has to do with Kavanaugh.

The government is a reflection of the Ruling Class. We have little to no impact on it. Have you failed to see that the Ruling Class ALWAYS gets it’s way, the people seldom do. Our government is for sale and we don’t have the money to buy it, but the Ruling Class does.

BO was without question the most secretive administration in a long time, if not ever. The DNCMSM assisted him in this effort. Even the DNCMSM members said so, and they loved and adored him, refusing to expose his many corrupt actions.

Apparently we need an R president for the DNCMSM to do it’s job.

 

[basquebromance]

who knows better about what a woman should do with her uterus than an old white guy?

Can you think of any laws that give the government the power to make decisions about the male body? If your answer is, 'No,' you’re probably qualified to be on the Supreme Court

 

[basquebromance]

Our culture does not encourage people who cause harm to take responsibility...It’s apparent everyday in today’s news and in every high school that the person who is actually placed on trial so often is the survivor

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

why do they need to talk to her exactly?

To prove her lies and prosecute if necessary. Kavvy as well!

She's the accuser. Its on her to provide the evidence. She lied and couldnt produce anything.

Then let her lie to the FBI, if they can prove she lied prosecute her.

She has no recollections, so there was nothing to investigate. The FBI has nothing to work with. But this never had anything to do with any of that. None of her alleged witnesses backed up her story. Even her former paramour said he never heard anything.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I wanted her interviewed so she would lie to the FBI and then she could be prosecuted. This is now about the 101st time it has been stated in this thread.

For what reason, so the Democrats can call Republicans evil doers for having a victim prosecuted by the federal government? So they can report 24/7 how tormented this victim is, how broke she is, what's going to happen to her kids, appearing in court in her prison jump suit?

You have to realize Republicans are much smarter than that. Democrats? Could care less about this woman. Let her go to prison if they can make political hay out of this.

 

[hunarcy]

Funny.

Truth can be.

How would you know? I haven't seen you post a true thing in this thread.

Lol, none of us know the truth.

And yet you keep posting as if you know the truth. Makes you fairly dishonest.

Nope I keep saying the FBI needs to interview both people to help get to the truth. Please try and keep up Raymond.

The two people have already testified before the Senate. No need to interview them again. And why do I need to keep up with Raymond?

 

[hunarcy]

How would you know? I haven't seen you post a true thing in this thread.

Lol, none of us know the truth.

And yet you keep posting as if you know the truth. Makes you fairly dishonest.

Nope I keep saying the FBI needs to interview both people to help get to the truth. Please try and keep up Raymond.

Why interview people who we already know their stance, vs looking at the entirety of the best possible evidence. Why doesn’t the left answer this question? They instead deflect too, let’s interview people who already gave their testimony...how on earth is that better than looking at the ONLY shreds of evidence to back up Ford? Why? Why? Why don’t you want to do that?

To set her up to lie again then prosecute her. Been saying it all thread wingnut.

If she's lied, she did it before Congress and can be prosecuted now for that.

 

[sakinago]

It happened in her imagination 35 years later. Of course she's just like the rest of us. We cant remember what years we went to high school or college. But anyway....back to the story. Her shrink was able to reach into alice in wonderland and conjure up this lurid tale from the deep recesses of fords brain. And voila.........it was true.

So your saying you have no idea what happened, thank you.

Right because the accusations are so vague and baseless, no one knows what happened, nor can it even be investigated more than it has been. Because all the witnesses say “nope don’t remember anything of the sort,”...and Ford and her legal team opt to selectively offer up portions of their “evidence”. On top of that Ford has already been caught lying about the origin one of those sources of evidence, and the other she’s alleged to be lying about by her former boyfriend of 6 years. That boyfriend mentions Fords friend (that she coached on polygraphs, then allegedly lied about), who also is the same friend pressuring Fords best friend from high school to change her testimony. How long are y’all gonna keep the charade up?

So her ex boyfriend, he said she said lol.

It’s not just him, it’s ALL the witnesses she cited too. And we have the permits showing the addition to her house was 4 years prior to the therapy session, for her in-home practice as well as a room to rent out to tenants. So the whole “we went to therapy because my husband just couldn’t understand me wanting a second front door, because of my fear of only having a single exit” was a lie. We also have the text messages of Fords party trying to convince witnesses to change their testimony.

The whole point here is that it is a he said she said. Allegations alone cannot be the standard we stand on for obvious reasons, not without corroborating evidence or a preponderance of evidence. The she said part is unraveling. The witnesses she has cited do not corroborate, and even flat out contradict her testimony. She offers no date, no time, no place, no other details outside of Kavanaugh did it, and I got away, so it’s impossible for Kavanaugh to dispute her testimony, outside of it being a he said she said. We (including the FBI) can only go off of her testimony. The only other evidence ford offers up outside of the witnesses that do not corroborate, she will not release in entirety. The FBI has interviewed the cited witnesses. The only one hindering the FBI investigation is Ford by withholding the rest of her evidence that hasn’t been flushed down the drain.

So I’ll ask again, why is it not important to you that she doesn’t just release that? Are you capable of not deflecting?

So you are saying she lied, but are happy with Bart's lies, duly noted.

She did lie, and I’ve been asking what did Brett lie about? The only answers given have been from hearsay, from people who weren’t even around Brett during higschool. Which Kav had already admitted to drinking in excess. We have the hard proof in hand that Ford had already lied, where’s the hard proof that Brett lied?

More importantly I asked why you don’t want Ford to release the only pieces of evidence that haven’t been shot down, in their entirety? You dodged that question yet again. Just answer me that question, be capable of honest conversation. How can you be so comfortable with this much mental gymnastics? How does that not give you a sinking feeling in your stomach?

I’m trying to be honest here. And honestly there isn’t much of a way to prove lied about his drinking habits, especially if he had already admitted to them. Might he have mischaracterized or downplayed them, sure. First you’re going to have to define excess (which he admitted too). It’s a subjective term, so good luck. Then you’re going to have to get multiple accounts from HIGHSCHOOL classmates that can attest to Brett tying one on almost every night, or whatever, something that’s going to definitively exceed whatever constitutes “excess” that’s more than just sometimes (also a subjective term). Even then, that would be all hearsay from subjective observations, from 36 years ago. But if enough convincing accounts come out, I’m able to agree that he probably lied about his drinking habits. We don’t have anything pointing us in that direction, not even close. Let’s not forget, this has little to do with sexual assault allegations...which are vastly more important than underage drinking. Why is it the goal posts have moved from sexual assault, to underage drinking?

I’ll ask this one more time. Don’t bother responding until you answer this. Why isn’t it important to you (or Ford, or anyone who opposes Kav) that Ford releases that only evidence that hasn’t fallen flat on its face?

 

[sakinago]

Our culture does not encourage people who cause harm to take responsibility...It’s apparent everyday in today’s news and in every high school that the person who is actually placed on trial so often is the survivor

Who caused harm and what are your facts for that. Also, do you believe allegations alone are enough to convict someone, either in trial or the court of public opinion, without corroborating evidence?

 

[sakinago]

If fords testimony is true, and her intentions are to advise the legislature about Kavanaugh...then why is she not releasing her “proof” (the audio recording of the polygraph, and the therapists notes) to the judicial committee for review? She states that she will do so, as long as the FBI questions her, which is convieniently one of the believed restrictions on the FBI in this case. Huh, isn’t that interesting. What is also interesting is that by demanding the FBI question her after she already gave her testimony, means that she apparently purgoured herself in the original testimony if she has something different to tell the FBI. Unless this is another stall tactic where when the FBI is ready to investigate her, she’ll be way too busy for a couple of weeks for an interview.

If someone tried to rape you, and was about to be seated on the Supreme Court...why hide the only evidence you have?

Nothing will be released it's all under Judicial review--and Ford has no power of what is going to be released, (if EVER.)

But here is a video statement from the former FBI agent that gave it to her.



Of course last night James Rotche a former Yale roommate of Kavanuagh dropped his 1000 pound bomb.

No one cares what an “ex-FBI official” has to say. It wasn’t an official polygraph, and polygraphs aren’t even used as evidence in courts because they are unreliable.

The ex-roommate had nothing on Kavanuagh and couldn’t even point out one “lie” despite CNN’s fake news headlines. He even backtracked his statements in that interview.

James Roche, the roommate of Kavanaugh pointed out several lies of Kavanaugh. Especially regarding his drinking habits back in the day. There are other witness's to this that the FBI never interviewed according to James Roche.

Right now there are protests going on everywhere, Susan Collins might as well start sending out her resume, color her gone when she goes up for reelection. My senator in Colorado, Cory Gardner, color him gone in 2020 when he's up, etc. etc. etc.

They might as well write their own obituaries. They really could not have given Democrats a better gift than this appointment.

I imagine the DNC is partying down right now

College roommate, important disctinction. The time in question is high school. Kids drink a shit ton more in college than high school which is a “no shit” distinction I shouldn’t have to keep pointing out here. They don’t have to worry about parents catching, they have much more access to alcohol, they don’t need an open house with parents away to party, they don’t have to drive as much, and their friends are around 24/7.

 

[hadit]

So your saying you have no idea what happened, thank you.

Right because the accusations are so vague and baseless, no one knows what happened, nor can it even be investigated more than it has been. Because all the witnesses say “nope don’t remember anything of the sort,”...and Ford and her legal team opt to selectively offer up portions of their “evidence”. On top of that Ford has already been caught lying about the origin one of those sources of evidence, and the other she’s alleged to be lying about by her former boyfriend of 6 years. That boyfriend mentions Fords friend (that she coached on polygraphs, then allegedly lied about), who also is the same friend pressuring Fords best friend from high school to change her testimony. How long are y’all gonna keep the charade up?

So her ex boyfriend, he said she said lol.

It’s not just him, it’s ALL the witnesses she cited too. And we have the permits showing the addition to her house was 4 years prior to the therapy session, for her in-home practice as well as a room to rent out to tenants. So the whole “we went to therapy because my husband just couldn’t understand me wanting a second front door, because of my fear of only having a single exit” was a lie. We also have the text messages of Fords party trying to convince witnesses to change their testimony.

The whole point here is that it is a he said she said. Allegations alone cannot be the standard we stand on for obvious reasons, not without corroborating evidence or a preponderance of evidence. The she said part is unraveling. The witnesses she has cited do not corroborate, and even flat out contradict her testimony. She offers no date, no time, no place, no other details outside of Kavanaugh did it, and I got away, so it’s impossible for Kavanaugh to dispute her testimony, outside of it being a he said she said. We (including the FBI) can only go off of her testimony. The only other evidence ford offers up outside of the witnesses that do not corroborate, she will not release in entirety. The FBI has interviewed the cited witnesses. The only one hindering the FBI investigation is Ford by withholding the rest of her evidence that hasn’t been flushed down the drain.

So I’ll ask again, why is it not important to you that she doesn’t just release that? Are you capable of not deflecting?

So you are saying she lied, but are happy with Bart's lies, duly noted.

She did lie, and I’ve been asking what did Brett lie about? The only answers given have been from hearsay, from people who weren’t even around Brett during higschool. Which Kav had already admitted to drinking in excess. We have the hard proof in hand that Ford had already lied, where’s the hard proof that Brett lied?

More importantly I asked why you don’t want Ford to release the only pieces of evidence that haven’t been shot down, in their entirety? You dodged that question yet again. Just answer me that question, be capable of honest conversation. How can you be so comfortable with this much mental gymnastics? How does that not give you a sinking feeling in your stomach?

I’m trying to be honest here. And honestly there isn’t much of a way to prove lied about his drinking habits, especially if he had already admitted to them. Might he have mischaracterized or downplayed them, sure. First you’re going to have to define excess (which he admitted too). It’s a subjective term, so good luck. Then you’re going to have to get multiple accounts from HIGHSCHOOL classmates that can attest to Brett tying one on almost every night, or whatever, something that’s going to definitively exceed whatever constitutes “excess” that’s more than just sometimes (also a subjective term). Even then, that would be all hearsay from subjective observations, from 36 years ago. But if enough convincing accounts come out, I’m able to agree that he probably lied about his drinking habits. We don’t have anything pointing us in that direction, not even close. Let’s not forget, this has little to do with sexual assault allegations...which are vastly more important than underage drinking. Why is it the goal posts have moved from sexual assault, to underage drinking?

I’ll ask this one more time. Don’t bother responding until you answer this. Why isn’t it important to you (or Ford, or anyone who opposes Kav) that Ford releases that only evidence that hasn’t fallen flat on its face?

My prediction: Kavanaugh gets confirmed and Ford gets dropped like a hot potato.

 

[jc456]

'If Fords testimony is true...'

Yeah, but it's not.

...and if a frog had wings he wouldn't bump his ass on the ground every time he jumped....

easyt65 dude, that’s some kind of special

 

[jc456]

Lol. Sure.

So you know what they said 100% for sure. Great, please share with the class.

FBI report states that one of the witnesses (fords best friend at the time, who said she didn’t even know Kavanaugh) was pressured by Fords “allies” to change her testimony. Witness intimidation anyone? The more stuff that comes out, the worse it looks for Ford.

Oh and Schumer leaked the story to the press.

What does Schumer have to do with finding the truth. And how would anyone know what is in the FBI report, they are not allowed to talk about it.

They released an executive summary. And Ford stated she wanted to remain anonymous, which wasn’t all that possible after the “leak”. So the left really doesn’t care about the feelings of “victims” when it comes to pushing their politics. Either this was coordinated, or the left is perfectly happy parading an alleged victim against her will. Take your pick.

And yet none of this is relevant to her testimony, nice deflection though.

Her testimony is irrelevant

 

[jc456]

It happened in her imagination 35 years later. Of course she's just like the rest of us. We cant remember what years we went to high school or college. But anyway....back to the story. Her shrink was able to reach into alice in wonderland and conjure up this lurid tale from the deep recesses of fords brain. And voila.........it was true.

So your saying you have no idea what happened, thank you.

Right because the accusations are so vague and baseless, no one knows what happened, nor can it even be investigated more than it has been. Because all the witnesses say “nope don’t remember anything of the sort,”...and Ford and her legal team opt to selectively offer up portions of their “evidence”. On top of that Ford has already been caught lying about the origin one of those sources of evidence, and the other she’s alleged to be lying about by her former boyfriend of 6 years. That boyfriend mentions Fords friend (that she coached on polygraphs, then allegedly lied about), who also is the same friend pressuring Fords best friend from high school to change her testimony. How long are y’all gonna keep the charade up?

So her ex boyfriend, he said she said lol.

It’s not just him, it’s ALL the witnesses she cited too. And we have the permits showing the addition to her house was 4 years prior to the therapy session, for her in-home practice as well as a room to rent out to tenants. So the whole “we went to therapy because my husband just couldn’t understand me wanting a second front door, because of my fear of only having a single exit” was a lie. We also have the text messages of Fords party trying to convince witnesses to change their testimony.

The whole point here is that it is a he said she said. Allegations alone cannot be the standard we stand on for obvious reasons, not without corroborating evidence or a preponderance of evidence. The she said part is unraveling. The witnesses she has cited do not corroborate, and even flat out contradict her testimony. She offers no date, no time, no place, no other details outside of Kavanaugh did it, and I got away, so it’s impossible for Kavanaugh to dispute her testimony, outside of it being a he said she said. We (including the FBI) can only go off of her testimony. The only other evidence ford offers up outside of the witnesses that do not corroborate, she will not release in entirety. The FBI has interviewed the cited witnesses. The only one hindering the FBI investigation is Ford by withholding the rest of her evidence that hasn’t been flushed down the drain.

So I’ll ask again, why is it not important to you that she doesn’t just release that? Are you capable of not deflecting?

So you are saying she lied, but are happy with Bart's lies, duly noted.

Still waiting for the lie!

 

[jc456]

Our culture does not encourage people who cause harm to take responsibility...It’s apparent everyday in today’s news and in every high school that the person who is actually placed on trial so often is the survivor

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Right because the accusations are so vague and baseless, no one knows what happened, nor can it even be investigated more than it has been. Because all the witnesses say “nope don’t remember anything of the sort,”...and Ford and her legal team opt to selectively offer up portions of their “evidence”. On top of that Ford has already been caught lying about the origin one of those sources of evidence, and the other she’s alleged to be lying about by her former boyfriend of 6 years. That boyfriend mentions Fords friend (that she coached on polygraphs, then allegedly lied about), who also is the same friend pressuring Fords best friend from high school to change her testimony. How long are y’all gonna keep the charade up?

So her ex boyfriend, he said she said lol.

It’s not just him, it’s ALL the witnesses she cited too. And we have the permits showing the addition to her house was 4 years prior to the therapy session, for her in-home practice as well as a room to rent out to tenants. So the whole “we went to therapy because my husband just couldn’t understand me wanting a second front door, because of my fear of only having a single exit” was a lie. We also have the text messages of Fords party trying to convince witnesses to change their testimony.

The whole point here is that it is a he said she said. Allegations alone cannot be the standard we stand on for obvious reasons, not without corroborating evidence or a preponderance of evidence. The she said part is unraveling. The witnesses she has cited do not corroborate, and even flat out contradict her testimony. She offers no date, no time, no place, no other details outside of Kavanaugh did it, and I got away, so it’s impossible for Kavanaugh to dispute her testimony, outside of it being a he said she said. We (including the FBI) can only go off of her testimony. The only other evidence ford offers up outside of the witnesses that do not corroborate, she will not release in entirety. The FBI has interviewed the cited witnesses. The only one hindering the FBI investigation is Ford by withholding the rest of her evidence that hasn’t been flushed down the drain.

So I’ll ask again, why is it not important to you that she doesn’t just release that? Are you capable of not deflecting?

So you are saying she lied, but are happy with Bart's lies, duly noted.

She did lie, and I’ve been asking what did Brett lie about? The only answers given have been from hearsay, from people who weren’t even around Brett during higschool. Which Kav had already admitted to drinking in excess. We have the hard proof in hand that Ford had already lied, where’s the hard proof that Brett lied?

More importantly I asked why you don’t want Ford to release the only pieces of evidence that haven’t been shot down, in their entirety? You dodged that question yet again. Just answer me that question, be capable of honest conversation. How can you be so comfortable with this much mental gymnastics? How does that not give you a sinking feeling in your stomach?

I’m trying to be honest here. And honestly there isn’t much of a way to prove lied about his drinking habits, especially if he had already admitted to them. Might he have mischaracterized or downplayed them, sure. First you’re going to have to define excess (which he admitted too). It’s a subjective term, so good luck. Then you’re going to have to get multiple accounts from HIGHSCHOOL classmates that can attest to Brett tying one on almost every night, or whatever, something that’s going to definitively exceed whatever constitutes “excess” that’s more than just sometimes (also a subjective term). Even then, that would be all hearsay from subjective observations, from 36 years ago. But if enough convincing accounts come out, I’m able to agree that he probably lied about his drinking habits. We don’t have anything pointing us in that direction, not even close. Let’s not forget, this has little to do with sexual assault allegations...which are vastly more important than underage drinking. Why is it the goal posts have moved from sexual assault, to underage drinking?

I’ll ask this one more time. Don’t bother responding until you answer this. Why isn’t it important to you (or Ford, or anyone who opposes Kav) that Ford releases that only evidence that hasn’t fallen flat on its face?

My prediction: Kavanaugh gets confirmed and Ford gets dropped like a hot potato.

Kav gets confirmed and the liberals protest or riot for at least another week.

 

[jc456]

why do they need to talk to her exactly?

To prove her lies and prosecute if necessary. Kavvy as well!

She's the accuser. Its on her to provide the evidence. She lied and couldnt produce anything.

Then let her lie to the FBI, if they can prove she lied prosecute her.

She has no recollections, so there was nothing to investigate. The FBI has nothing to work with. But this never had anything to do with any of that. None of her alleged witnesses backed up her story. Even her former paramour said he never heard anything.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I wanted her interviewed so she would lie to the FBI and then she could be prosecuted. This is now about the 101st time it has been stated in this thread.

Nobody cares. Isn’t that obvious after 101 tries?

 

[jc456]

So her ex boyfriend, he said she said lol.

It’s not just him, it’s ALL the witnesses she cited too. And we have the permits showing the addition to her house was 4 years prior to the therapy session, for her in-home practice as well as a room to rent out to tenants. So the whole “we went to therapy because my husband just couldn’t understand me wanting a second front door, because of my fear of only having a single exit” was a lie. We also have the text messages of Fords party trying to convince witnesses to change their testimony.

The whole point here is that it is a he said she said. Allegations alone cannot be the standard we stand on for obvious reasons, not without corroborating evidence or a preponderance of evidence. The she said part is unraveling. The witnesses she has cited do not corroborate, and even flat out contradict her testimony. She offers no date, no time, no place, no other details outside of Kavanaugh did it, and I got away, so it’s impossible for Kavanaugh to dispute her testimony, outside of it being a he said she said. We (including the FBI) can only go off of her testimony. The only other evidence ford offers up outside of the witnesses that do not corroborate, she will not release in entirety. The FBI has interviewed the cited witnesses. The only one hindering the FBI investigation is Ford by withholding the rest of her evidence that hasn’t been flushed down the drain.

So I’ll ask again, why is it not important to you that she doesn’t just release that? Are you capable of not deflecting?

So you are saying she lied, but are happy with Bart's lies, duly noted.

She did lie, and I’ve been asking what did Brett lie about? The only answers given have been from hearsay, from people who weren’t even around Brett during higschool. Which Kav had already admitted to drinking in excess. We have the hard proof in hand that Ford had already lied, where’s the hard proof that Brett lied?

More importantly I asked why you don’t want Ford to release the only pieces of evidence that haven’t been shot down, in their entirety? You dodged that question yet again. Just answer me that question, be capable of honest conversation. How can you be so comfortable with this much mental gymnastics? How does that not give you a sinking feeling in your stomach?

I’m trying to be honest here. And honestly there isn’t much of a way to prove lied about his drinking habits, especially if he had already admitted to them. Might he have mischaracterized or downplayed them, sure. First you’re going to have to define excess (which he admitted too). It’s a subjective term, so good luck. Then you’re going to have to get multiple accounts from HIGHSCHOOL classmates that can attest to Brett tying one on almost every night, or whatever, something that’s going to definitively exceed whatever constitutes “excess” that’s more than just sometimes (also a subjective term). Even then, that would be all hearsay from subjective observations, from 36 years ago. But if enough convincing accounts come out, I’m able to agree that he probably lied about his drinking habits. We don’t have anything pointing us in that direction, not even close. Let’s not forget, this has little to do with sexual assault allegations...which are vastly more important than underage drinking. Why is it the goal posts have moved from sexual assault, to underage drinking?

I’ll ask this one more time. Don’t bother responding until you answer this. Why isn’t it important to you (or Ford, or anyone who opposes Kav) that Ford releases that only evidence that hasn’t fallen flat on its face?

My prediction: Kavanaugh gets confirmed and Ford gets dropped like a hot potato.

Kav gets confirmed and the liberals protest or riot for at least another week.

I want someone to take out these people if that happens

 

[jc456]

who knows better about what a woman should do with her uterus than an old white guy?

Can you think of any laws that give the government the power to make decisions about the male body? If your answer is, 'No,' you’re probably qualified to be on the Supreme Court

What is it for? Enlighten us white guy!