They dont' like to do that, because inevitibly, the "huge differences" are well within the margins for error.
They DO do that because they're real scientists doing actual science.
That's a lie.
The IPCC receives funding through a dedicated trust fund. UNEP and the WMO established the fund in 1989. The trust fund receives annual financial contributions from member governments. The WMO, UNEP and other organizations also contribute. Payments are voluntary and there is no set amount required. The WMO covers the operating costs of the secretariat. It also sets the IPCC's financial regulations and rules.[32] The Panel sets the annual budget.
In 2021, the IPCC's annual budget amounts to approximately six million euros, financed by the 195 UN Member states, who contribute "independently and voluntarily".[33][34] In 2021, the countries giving the most money include the United States, Japan, France, Germany and Norway.[33] Other countries, often developing ones, give an "in-kind contribution, by hosting IPCC meetings".[33] In 2022, this budget was a little less than eight million euros.[33]
Seriously, you thought that they cranked out that nonsense without a financial motive?
Are you actually that fucking stupid? That money pays for their WORK, the assessment of thousands of published studies and the composition of their reports. BY THEIR CHARTER, THEY FUND
NO SCIENCE. NONE
I don't need you to "fix the world," because you have not shown evidence that:
a) The world is "broken."
b) It can be "fixed" if people are only taxed at higher rates, nor
c) How much it will cost for you to "fix the world."
The conversation here concerns anthropogenic global warming. There is no such thing as a free lunch and so I have never suggested that this will resolve itself for free but I'm no economist and have never argued the detailed economics of this problem here. What I HAVE argued is that putting off dealing with this problem, as putting off dealing with almost ANY problem, will dramatically increase its cost. Your mommy likely told you that when you were quite young and she was correct.
Even thought of what a bizarre savior complex it takes to even think that way?
I have no fucking idea what you're talking about, but then, neither do you.
Lets talk about c). Well? How much?
A lot. The world is a big place and we've been fucking it up for a long time.
How much to reverse global warming and by how many degrees will that money reverse it?
That is the task of the IPCC's Working Group III. Here is their section of AR6:
AR6 Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change — IPCC
Right now, the climate alarmists are not providing such figures,
That information was published with AR1, AR2, AR3, AR4, AR5 and now AR6 you fucking ignorant fool.
so I don't expect you to be able to. Instead the idea is "trust us, and give us your money, or we will insult you!"
That information was published with AR1, AR2, AR3, AR4, AR5 and now AR6 you fucking ignorant fool.
But if you have the answers, please provide them.
That information was published with AR1, AR2, AR3, AR4, AR5 and now AR6 you fucking ignorant fool.
Well, you just go right ahead and insult me.
You're an ignorant fool.
I am aware of that.
My questions are since Biden ran on the bizarre promise of stopping the climate from changing (!)
He said no such thing.
, why is he bragging about those horrible fossil fuels he is leading the nation to produce.
I have not heard him bragging about it, but since, despite his warning to the nation that our policies vis-a-vis Ukraine and Russia were going to run up oil prices, you've all been blaming him for raising oil prices. That would make me think that you might be glad US oil production has risen to the occasion. However, as a portion of our consumption, wind and solar are still growing while fossil fuel use is still shrinking. We are meeting that demand AND moving away from fossil fuel. So what exactly is your problem?
Also, how can you AGW alarmists vote for him in November?
Real, real, real, REAL easily.
If Biden is producing more oil than Trump, then by the math, Trump produced less oil than Biden (think about it), so Trump is your man!
So, Trump was a
complete failure - the worst president in US history by a large margin - and he sure the fuck hasn't gotten any better.
If you understood the basic science, you would have posted the parts of your links that show you are correct. Instead you give a link and insist I read it. If I did and it did not show what you claim, how would you respond?
Since you understand these things so much better than do I, why don't you show us how to provide a link to a few sentences within a multi-page article.
And if you think a link I've provided countered what I'd provided it to support, identify the link instead of pretending that was the case.
You'd say "read it again, and try to understand it!" or some other condescending nonsense that Democrats think is a persuasive argument.
I'm terribly sorry I'm forced to be as condescending towards you as I am, but that's the consequences when you failed to do what it was you were supposed to do when your parents sent you away to get an education. They did send you somewhere to get an education didn't they? I hope you've apologized to them for the way things turned out.
en.wikipedia.org
www.epa.gov
