basquebromance
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2015
- 109,396
- 27,175
- 2,220
- Banned
- #1
don't disappoint us Brad. i mean Brett. whatever. just dont disappoint!
you too, Gorsuch!
you too, Gorsuch!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you're obsessed with Secretary Clinton.If Hilary wasn’t a corrupt piece of garbage, she would be POTUS.
you're obsessed with Secretary Clinton.If Hilary wasn’t a corrupt piece of garbage, she would be POTUS.
The precedent is that presidents show their taxes so what would the sc do differently?don't disappoint us Brad. i mean Brett. whatever. just dont disappoint!
you too, Gorsuch!
the president cannot be indicted. let me say that again to you: the president cannot be indicted.Trump is not above the law
Trump is not above the law
Legal precedent?The precedent is that presidents show their taxes so what would the sc do differently?
Indeed...Had he broken any tax law, he would have had IRS auditors and CID agents crawling up his ass with a microscope years ago....But there hasn't been any of that.Trump is not above the law
the president cannot be indicted. let me say that again to you: the president cannot be indicted.Trump is not above the law
kavanaugh supposedly agrees. let's see if he sticks to his word
I thought Trump said he would release his tax returns? Then he said no one wanted to see them. Why would he not do what every other president has done and release his tax documents?
Indeed...Had he broken any tax law, he would have had IRS auditors and CID agents crawling up his ass with a microscope years ago....But there hasn't been any of that.Trump is not above the law
you're obsessed with Secretary Clinton.If Hilary wasn’t a corrupt piece of garbage, she would be POTUS.
You’re so cliche.
Try another one.
I’ll bite.
What would be the grounds for the subpoena and what do you expect to find and what will be the consequences. Lay it all out in detail.
The precedent is that presidents show their taxes so what would the sc do differently?don't disappoint us Brad. i mean Brett. whatever. just dont disappoint!
you too, Gorsuch!
Sure he canthe president cannot be indicted. let me say that again to you: the president cannot be indicted.Trump is not above the law
kavanaugh supposedly agrees. let's see if he sticks to his word