If conservatives acted like Leftists

[Rogue AI]

Without workers there is no wealth creation.

Automation disagrees.

 

[rightwinger]

Automation disagrees.

Without workers, there is no automation

 

[IM2]

Somebody has to fix the machines.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Without workers, there is no automation

AI is fixing that.

 

[Rogue AI]

Without workers, there is no automation

You lost the argument long ago, stop trying to be a petty child.

 

[LeftofLeft]

If Conservatives acted like leftists

They would care more about the well being of the American People than about the well being of the wealthy

PEW RESEARCH: The Top income people are voting Democrat 53 Percent. Low income people are voting Democrat 58 Percent. Where does that leave Conservatives in your statement?

 

[rightwinger]

PEW RESEARCH: The Top income people are voting Democrat 53 Percent. Low income people are voting Democrat 58 Percent. Where does that leave Conservatives in your statement?

OK Skippy.

Name a piece of Conservative legislation that helps working Americans more than the rich

 

[Rawley]

What laws have Conservatives ever passed that help working Americans more than the wealthy?

Latest - BBB

Dude - face reality, your cult has become the party of the rich.

 

[rightwinger]

Latest - BBB

Dude - face reality, your cult has become the party of the rich.

Tax cuts for the super wealthy paid for with cuts to programs that help the poor

 

[Rawley]

Tax cuts for the super wealthy paid for with cuts to programs that help the poor

Nope. Spit out the Kool-aide

 

[gipper]

There is no uniparty. This is obvious if you look at the behavior of both parties right now.

It’s so obvious, yet you refuse to accept it. You want to believe your party is better. The reality is it’s almost exactly the same as the party you hate.

 

[rightwinger]

Tax cuts for the super wealthy paid for with cuts to programs that help the poor

• The H. Con. Res. 14 (House Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for FY 2025) sets spending and revenue levels for FY 2025 and the 2026–2034 period. Congress.gov+3Congress.gov+3budget.house.gov+3
• It gives instruction for the budget reconciliation process, which Republicans intend to use to pass big tax and spending changes with a simple majority. budget.house.gov+2Congress.gov+2
• The blueprint includes:
  • Up to $4.5 trillion in tax cuts over the next decade. Nerd's Eye View | Kitces.com+2Center on Budget and Policy Priorities+2
  • A goal of about $1.5–2 trillion in spending reductions over the next decade to help offset those tax cuts. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities+2hern.house.gov+2
  • Stronger spending on border security, defense, and energy priorities. Bipartisan Policy Center+2PBS+2
• For example, budget documents say:
  • The resolution calls for ~$10.0 trillion in budget authority and ~$9.7 trillion in outlays over the 10-year window. Congress.gov+2hern.house.gov+2
  • Within FY 2025 alone: ~$921.7 billion in budget authority for a subset of programs, ~$884.4 billion in outlays (per one excerpt) though this is incomplete for the total budget. Congress.gov
• On the tax side: The plan would extend or enhance many of the provisions from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) and proposes raising the standard deduction, among other tax-cuts. Bipartisan Policy Center+1

Key criticisms & concerns

• Many analysis groups warn that the cuts to social programs (e.g., Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Medicaid, federal health and education spending) are deep and could significantly impact low- and moderate-income Americans. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
• The plan is viewed by some as shifting resources away from social safety net and public services toward tax relief (especially benefiting higher-income individuals) and defense/border priorities. Center for American Progress+1
• There’s concern about how the tax cuts and spending reductions will affect the long-term fiscal outlook – some analyses suggest weaker economic growth and higher debt under certain assumptions

 

[IM2]

It’s so obvious, yet you refuse to accept it. You want to believe your party is better. The reality is it’s almost exactly the same as the party you hate.

I'm looking at both parties. I see the difference.

 

[gipper]

I'm looking at both parties. I see the difference.

Then you see the very tiny difference that in effect is meaningless.

 

[AntonToo]

If conservatives acted like leftists they would reject a twice impeached, 5 times indicted, pathologically lying criminal to be their leader.

The movement overall has turned into a degenerate cult that suvives on fact-free meme propaganda.

 

[BlindBoo]

What if liberals acted like Rabid Right Wingers?

The Wingers want no middle.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Many modern big-government mouthpieces have arbitrarily adopted the term ''conservative'' and are the so-called ''left.''

Especially on here. It's a very rabid and prominent phenomenon on this board particularly. Especially since around 2021/2022 when this new crowd showed up en masse from wherever they came from.

There seems to be a severe lack the self-awareness in understanding this reality, though.

It's humorous, really, watching them try to estabish some illusion of difference day in and day out. Though very pathetic to watch for those of us who actually are trustees in the model of very small, strictly limited, fiscally responsible, non-authoritarian, liberty protecting, government.

A lot of people who make up the new Repubican party claim, again, particularly on here, to have used to have been Democrates. Heh heh...''used to be,'' they say...

But that demograph has observably retained and maintained its authoritarian, big-government fundamentals if you really pay attention to what it says.

In that regard, there really isn't a nickel's worth of difference beteween them collectively speaking.

And it's glaringly observable if one actually reads the bulk of dialogue.

In fact, if one really pays attention, this new brand of arbitrary ''conservative'' is actually more ''leftist'' than traditional so-called ''leftists'' in a lot of ways.

 

[Maxdeath]

Pandering to the wealthy is not how the economy works.
It is the workers who create wealth

Really? Exactly how many workers own Microsoft or Amazon or other big companies? How many of those workers are buying up thousands of share in those type of big companies that allow those companies to hire workers, expand and continue to innovate?
I know you think idiots like Bernie Sanders are great thinkers but exactly how many of his mansions has he sold so he can donate that money to the working man?
The tax cuts passed by Trump and the republicans were not just for the wealthy, no matter what your masters told you. In fact the tax cut that was given to the wealthy brought billions that had been offshore back onto American soil where it increased tax revenues. It also increased workers paychecks.
But how dare your masters tell you the truth or you educate yourself.

 

[BackAgain]

If Conservatives acted like leftists

They would care more about the well being of the American People than about the well being of the wealthy

Nonsense.

Your “side” caused the Schumer Shutdown because it cares only about power and it is absolutely indifferent to anyone who it hurts along the way.

 

[BackAgain]

Many modern big-government mouthpieces have arbitrarily adopted the term ''conservative'' and are the so-called ''left.''

Especially on here. It's a very rabid and prominent phenomenon on this board particularly. Especially since around 2021/2022 when this new crowd showed up en masse from wherever they came from.

There seems to be a severe lack the self-awareness in understanding this reality, though.

It's humorous, really, watching them try to estabish some illusion of difference day in and day out. Though very pathetic to watch for those of us who actually are trustees in the model of very small, strictly limited, fiscally responsible, non-authoritarian, liberty protecting, government.

A lot of people who make up the new Repubican party claim, again, particularly on here, to have used to have been Democrates. Heh heh...''used to be,'' they say...

But that demograph has observably retained and maintained its big-government fundamentals if you really pay attention to what it says.

In that regard, there really isn't a nickel's worth of difference beteween them collectively speaking.

And it's glaringly observable if one actually reads to bulk of dialogue.

In fact, if one really pays attention, this new brand of arbitrary ''conservative'' is actually more ''leftist'' than traditional so-called ''leftists'' in a lot of ways.

Democrates?

Reads to?