The 74.2Mil who voted for Trump get congressmen? Do those in MA get them? What about those that only vote in the Presidential election, antisemite? Quit dodging. They DON'T. Our system isn't perfect. Glad you admit that AOC is a loon. She is almost as crazy as you but even she knows MJ was an elite hoops player.
Who then?
It just means that we'll have proof of what a lot of people already assume -- elections don't matter. The elites decide who enters power.
So are you Ok with that? 74.2mil have zero representation. Same for 66mil post 2016 election? Are you Ok with that? Yes or no? Simple question.
The other issues were settled by the court. Both Republicans and democrats voting, followed the rules in place before the voting started....that were settled by the court when lawsuits were brought.Machines only count votes. Did you read your own article? Many disputes about legality of those casting ballots. Read your own articleI can do that too...Per your article it is. Did you mean to post a different article? Please do so.Nope, it's no longer in dispute.Your own link isn’t even conclusive. It’s disputed. Did you even read it? You’re such a loser it’s sad. A loser antisemite.
Audits find no problems with Arizona election equipment
PHOENIX (AP) — Two independent audits of election equipment in Arizona's most populous county found no modified software, malicious software or incorrect counting equipment, and none of the computers or equipment were connected to the internet.apnews.com
PHOENIX (AP) — Two independent audits of election equipment in Arizona’s most populous county found no modified software, malicious software or incorrect counting equipment, and none of the computers or equipment were connected to the internet.
... meanwhile, the point of contention raised by Fann was...
“That’s what we agreed on, and that’s not what we got,” Fann said. “One of the companies that did it was a company that all they do is certify machines — they do not do an audit.”
Aside from the fact the other company did audits, she threw her own complaint that one company only certifies machines into the trash when she hired a company to do their audit which is not in the business to perform an election audit, is not certified to perform an election audit, and has never performed an election audit.
Too bad she turned out to be a monumental hypocrite.
Regardless, they were audited and the machines passed.
In your opinion. But obviously many disagree. Maybe there should be a live debate on TV so we the American people can hear both sides and decide for ourselves? Don’t tell me what to think. Present the facts and allow me to make my own conclusions. Since you’re so confident, please briefly summarize both arguments for me and allow me to make my decision. Thank you.The other issues were settled by the court. Both Republicans and democrats voting, followed the rules in place before the voting started....that were settled by the court when lawsuits were brought.Machines only count votes. Did you read your own article? Many disputes about legality of those casting ballots. Read your own articleI can do that too...Per your article it is. Did you mean to post a different article? Please do so.Nope, it's no longer in dispute.Your own link isn’t even conclusive. It’s disputed. Did you even read it? You’re such a loser it’s sad. A loser antisemite.Audits find no problems with Arizona election equipment
PHOENIX (AP) — Two independent audits of election equipment in Arizona's most populous county found no modified software, malicious software or incorrect counting equipment, and none of the computers or equipment were connected to the internet.
PHOENIX (AP) — Two independent audits of election equipment in Arizona’s most populous county found no modified software, malicious software or incorrect counting equipment, and none of the computers or equipment were connected to the internet.
... meanwhile, the point of contention raised by Fann was...
“That’s what we agreed on, and that’s not what we got,” Fann said. “One of the companies that did it was a company that all they do is certify machines — they do not do an audit.”
Aside from the fact the other company did audits, she threw her own complaint that one company only certifies machines into the trash when she hired a company to do their audit which is not in the business to perform an election audit, is not certified to perform an election audit, and has never performed an election audit.
Too bad she turned out to be a monumental hypocrite.
Regardless, they were audited and the machines passed.
That is NOT fraud, or cheating or illegal.
Just read the court cases, and summaries. Easy peasy. The problem is, you won't do it.In your opinion. But obviously many disagree. Maybe there should be a live debate on TV so we the American people can hear both sides and decide for ourselves? Don’t tell me what to think. Present the facts and allow me to make my own conclusions. Since you’re so confident, please briefly summarize both arguments for me and allow me to make my decision. Thank you.The other issues were settled by the court. Both Republicans and democrats voting, followed the rules in place before the voting started....that were settled by the court when lawsuits were brought.Machines only count votes. Did you read your own article? Many disputes about legality of those casting ballots. Read your own articleI can do that too...Per your article it is. Did you mean to post a different article? Please do so.Nope, it's no longer in dispute.Your own link isn’t even conclusive. It’s disputed. Did you even read it? You’re such a loser it’s sad. A loser antisemite.Audits find no problems with Arizona election equipment
PHOENIX (AP) — Two independent audits of election equipment in Arizona's most populous county found no modified software, malicious software or incorrect counting equipment, and none of the computers or equipment were connected to the internet.
PHOENIX (AP) — Two independent audits of election equipment in Arizona’s most populous county found no modified software, malicious software or incorrect counting equipment, and none of the computers or equipment were connected to the internet.
... meanwhile, the point of contention raised by Fann was...
“That’s what we agreed on, and that’s not what we got,” Fann said. “One of the companies that did it was a company that all they do is certify machines — they do not do an audit.”
Aside from the fact the other company did audits, she threw her own complaint that one company only certifies machines into the trash when she hired a company to do their audit which is not in the business to perform an election audit, is not certified to perform an election audit, and has never performed an election audit.
Too bad she turned out to be a monumental hypocrite.
Regardless, they were audited and the machines passed.
That is NOT fraud, or cheating or illegal.
You seem to be an expert. Please summarize it for me. From what I read there are still disputed facts.Just read the court cases, and summaries. Easy peasy. The problem is, you won't do it.In your opinion. But obviously many disagree. Maybe there should be a live debate on TV so we the American people can hear both sides and decide for ourselves? Don’t tell me what to think. Present the facts and allow me to make my own conclusions. Since you’re so confident, please briefly summarize both arguments for me and allow me to make my decision. Thank you.The other issues were settled by the court. Both Republicans and democrats voting, followed the rules in place before the voting started....that were settled by the court when lawsuits were brought.Machines only count votes. Did you read your own article? Many disputes about legality of those casting ballots. Read your own articleI can do that too...Per your article it is. Did you mean to post a different article? Please do so.Nope, it's no longer in dispute.Your own link isn’t even conclusive. It’s disputed. Did you even read it? You’re such a loser it’s sad. A loser antisemite.Audits find no problems with Arizona election equipment
PHOENIX (AP) — Two independent audits of election equipment in Arizona's most populous county found no modified software, malicious software or incorrect counting equipment, and none of the computers or equipment were connected to the internet.
PHOENIX (AP) — Two independent audits of election equipment in Arizona’s most populous county found no modified software, malicious software or incorrect counting equipment, and none of the computers or equipment were connected to the internet.
... meanwhile, the point of contention raised by Fann was...
“That’s what we agreed on, and that’s not what we got,” Fann said. “One of the companies that did it was a company that all they do is certify machines — they do not do an audit.”
Aside from the fact the other company did audits, she threw her own complaint that one company only certifies machines into the trash when she hired a company to do their audit which is not in the business to perform an election audit, is not certified to perform an election audit, and has never performed an election audit.
Too bad she turned out to be a monumental hypocrite.
Regardless, they were audited and the machines passed.
That is NOT fraud, or cheating or illegal.
21 million were illegal ballots, so you are wrong.
