not at all, in fact conservatives are more than 43% of the population and only 38% are demofks. just a fact. 47% of americans pay no income tax and most all vote for demofks. the most unproductive class in america. Now ask yourself, why would 47% of americans who don't pay taxes want demofks. it's an easy answer.
those cases were dismissed by judges bought off by demofks. we know it. We know it because the cases were about questionable ballots. You know one can't merely leave with a ballot from a precinct, right? you need a ........... Warrant. Who provides warrants? ahhh yes judges. why would a judge not want to ensure integrity of an election? I only have one option here.The other issues were settled by the court. Both Republicans and democrats voting, followed the rules in place before the voting started....that were settled by the court when lawsuits were brought.Machines only count votes. Did you read your own article? Many disputes about legality of those casting ballots. Read your own articleI can do that too...Per your article it is. Did you mean to post a different article? Please do so.Nope, it's no longer in dispute.Your own link isn’t even conclusive. It’s disputed. Did you even read it? You’re such a loser it’s sad. A loser antisemite.
Audits find no problems with Arizona election equipment
PHOENIX (AP) — Two independent audits of election equipment in Arizona's most populous county found no modified software, malicious software or incorrect counting equipment, and none of the computers or equipment were connected to the internet.apnews.com
PHOENIX (AP) — Two independent audits of election equipment in Arizona’s most populous county found no modified software, malicious software or incorrect counting equipment, and none of the computers or equipment were connected to the internet.
... meanwhile, the point of contention raised by Fann was...
“That’s what we agreed on, and that’s not what we got,” Fann said. “One of the companies that did it was a company that all they do is certify machines — they do not do an audit.”
Aside from the fact the other company did audits, she threw her own complaint that one company only certifies machines into the trash when she hired a company to do their audit which is not in the business to perform an election audit, is not certified to perform an election audit, and has never performed an election audit.
Too bad she turned out to be a monumental hypocrite.
Regardless, they were audited and the machines passed.
That is NOT fraud, or cheating or illegal.
they saved the blacks. wow. You're still ignorant on the origination of the black slave.
That you can't prove that indicates how insane you are.
Which party supports BDS?
hahahahahahaha, your own fking graph proves my point. too fking funny. you all can't help yourselves. dude, now that was some kind of special.
No they weren't. They were handled as all suits are handled under the law.those cases were dismissed by judges bought off by demofks. we know it. We know it because the cases were about questionable ballots. You know one can't merely leave with a ballot from a precinct, right? you need a ........... Warrant. Who provides warrants? ahhh yes judges. why would a judge not want to ensure integrity of an election? I only have one option here.The other issues were settled by the court. Both Republicans and democrats voting, followed the rules in place before the voting started....that were settled by the court when lawsuits were brought.Machines only count votes. Did you read your own article? Many disputes about legality of those casting ballots. Read your own articleI can do that too...Per your article it is. Did you mean to post a different article? Please do so.Nope, it's no longer in dispute.Your own link isn’t even conclusive. It’s disputed. Did you even read it? You’re such a loser it’s sad. A loser antisemite.Audits find no problems with Arizona election equipment
PHOENIX (AP) — Two independent audits of election equipment in Arizona's most populous county found no modified software, malicious software or incorrect counting equipment, and none of the computers or equipment were connected to the internet.
PHOENIX (AP) — Two independent audits of election equipment in Arizona’s most populous county found no modified software, malicious software or incorrect counting equipment, and none of the computers or equipment were connected to the internet.
... meanwhile, the point of contention raised by Fann was...
“That’s what we agreed on, and that’s not what we got,” Fann said. “One of the companies that did it was a company that all they do is certify machines — they do not do an audit.”
Aside from the fact the other company did audits, she threw her own complaint that one company only certifies machines into the trash when she hired a company to do their audit which is not in the business to perform an election audit, is not certified to perform an election audit, and has never performed an election audit.
Too bad she turned out to be a monumental hypocrite.
Regardless, they were audited and the machines passed.
That is NOT fraud, or cheating or illegal.
Which judge? Summarize it for me as you state you're an expert on this. If this is an open and shut case then why is there controversy?No they weren't. They were handled as all suits are handled under the law.those cases were dismissed by judges bought off by demofks. we know it. We know it because the cases were about questionable ballots. You know one can't merely leave with a ballot from a precinct, right? you need a ........... Warrant. Who provides warrants? ahhh yes judges. why would a judge not want to ensure integrity of an election? I only have one option here.The other issues were settled by the court. Both Republicans and democrats voting, followed the rules in place before the voting started....that were settled by the court when lawsuits were brought.Machines only count votes. Did you read your own article? Many disputes about legality of those casting ballots. Read your own articleI can do that too...Per your article it is. Did you mean to post a different article? Please do so.Nope, it's no longer in dispute.Your own link isn’t even conclusive. It’s disputed. Did you even read it? You’re such a loser it’s sad. A loser antisemite.Audits find no problems with Arizona election equipment
PHOENIX (AP) — Two independent audits of election equipment in Arizona's most populous county found no modified software, malicious software or incorrect counting equipment, and none of the computers or equipment were connected to the internet.
PHOENIX (AP) — Two independent audits of election equipment in Arizona’s most populous county found no modified software, malicious software or incorrect counting equipment, and none of the computers or equipment were connected to the internet.
... meanwhile, the point of contention raised by Fann was...
“That’s what we agreed on, and that’s not what we got,” Fann said. “One of the companies that did it was a company that all they do is certify machines — they do not do an audit.”
Aside from the fact the other company did audits, she threw her own complaint that one company only certifies machines into the trash when she hired a company to do their audit which is not in the business to perform an election audit, is not certified to perform an election audit, and has never performed an election audit.
Too bad she turned out to be a monumental hypocrite.
Regardless, they were audited and the machines passed.
That is NOT fraud, or cheating or illegal.
Every case, received briefs from both sides of the suit, showing their best evidence and reason for suit, and every judge went thru the lawyer brief summaries to decide if the suit had merit, under the law of the land, and those cases that did...went forward and those that didn't, did not go forward.
But they were not simply dismissed. The cases that were dismissed and those not, were given the judges summary of why he or she, legally rejected or accepted the case, under the rule of law. Read the judges summary, in all the Arizona law suits.
LOLhahahahahahaha, your own fking graph proves my point. too fking funny. you all can't help yourselves. dude, now that was some kind of special.
you obviously can't read. What did I write, I wrote, one can't merely walk out of a precinct office with a ballot. So you are fking incorrect, the brief was for warrants to release the ballots under question. the judges dismissed them because of no evidence. well duh, they need a warrant to get the evidence. McFly!!!!!!!
the affidavits were about getting the evidence. again, for the umpteenth fking time in here, it is illegal to remove a ballot from a precinct office. one needs a warrant to bring the ballot to court. The ballots were the evidence sworn in by affidavits by reps monitoring the count. McFly!!!!!!!
Why? It's only Thursday and they don't do MegaMillion till tomorrow.
Trump was winning on election night. Then ballots for Biden mysteriously showed up after midnight.
The reporting of the votes was all crazy.
Solid proof of voter fraud.
Rudy has the evidence. Liberal judges blocked him every time.
