If a man can marry a man

[frigidweirdo]

I mentioned veterans as an example.

The reason gays cannot get marriage benefits is because they cannot get married. And the reason they cannot get married is because they are not a man and a woman. It's not because the society is discriminating against them.

Lmao, I love how you're looking for a way out of the conversation cause you sense you're losing.

Yeah, I'm losing because it's a crap conversation. I only win when it's a good conversation, even if I'm wrong, because if I'm wrong, I learn something new.

Bye.

 

[hjmick]

How does this equal the green deal?

I couldn't care less about the "Green Deal."

 

[MayorQuimby]

Yeah, I'm losing because it's a crap conversation. I only win when it's a good conversation, even if I'm wrong, because if I'm wrong, I learn something new.

Dude, I tried to show you that your basis "as long as it doesn't hurt anyone" was crap, but you wouldn't listen.

Bye.

I had fun punishing you. I hope to repeat this experience again.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Dude, I tried to show you that your basis "as long as it doesn't hurt anyone" was crap, but you wouldn't listen.

I had fun punishing you. I hope to repeat this experience again.

Won't happen, I'm putting you on the ignore list. I can't be bothered with people like you. Bye

 

[MayorQuimby]

Won't happen, I'm putting you on the ignore list. I can't be bothered with people like you. Bye

Lmao, I hurt your feelings so much that you have to run from me.

SAD

 

[otto105]

If we can stop close relatives from marrying each other, then we can stop two men from marrying each other.

It's about whether we have the political will.

Have you no understanding of genetics.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Have you no understanding of genetics.

Incestuous relationship does not have to result in offspring.

 

[otto105]

Our society decided murder is wrong, theft is wrong, driving intoxicated is wrong, and an infinite amount of other things are and aren’t wrong, what gives anyone the right to decide anything then? you dumb twat

All not personal body autonomy rights.

Murder involves killing another person.

Driving intoxicated endangers others

How can you equate those to personal choice that doesn’t involve others?

 

[otto105]

Incestuous relationship does not have to result in offspring.

WTF

 

[Zincwarrior]

By civil union I mean having a wedding where you invite the families to celebrate. A legal contract is not required for this activity.

Then its just a party. who cares?

 

[Zincwarrior]

This is dumb.

Thread win.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Then its just a party. who cares?

You do.

Men being to stick their penis into an anus is important to you.

 

[Blaster]

Is a chick with a dick a man or a woman?

 

[MayorQuimby]

Thread win.

Did you see my response in that thread in the science where I crushed your hero's nut-sack?

 

[Zincwarrior]

You do.

Men being to stick their penis into an anus is important to you.

So you quit arguing the topic. Your surrender is noted.

 

[MayorQuimby]

So you quit arguing the topic. Your surrender is noted.

You need to take online forums and yourself less seriously.

 

[Zincwarrior]

You need to take online forums and yourself less seriously.

You need to make a better argument.

 

[MayorQuimby]

You need to make a better argument.

Don't need that. I punish your butt cheeks with natural ease.

 

[evenflow1969]

Then someone should be allowed to marry a dead person. Laws always mention persons, but it doesn't say these persons have to be alive.

The current laws forbidding the marriage between a live person and a dead person are discriminatory just like the laws in some jurisdictions that forbid two people of the same sex from marrying. Therefore these laws are discriminatory and need to be struck down. Homosexuals have the right to marriage like heterosexuals. In a similar vein, dead people have the right to marriage just like live people.

Lol, what the hell do I care if two dudes wanna marry? Effects me not at all. Quite frankly I believe you are an idiot to get married today. Don't need the state in my shit. It is a losing proposition bringing the state into relationships. Especially if you are male. Lol, interested in watching a divorce case for two gay dudes. Can you imagine the judges confusion. How does the judge figure out who to screw over when they are both men? Typical case is easy. The judge listens to all the bull shit then fucks over the man in favor of the women. Now it's two men, how does he decide who to screw over? Ya, I like making the job of a family court judge hard. Gives me warm and fuzzies inside.

 

[Michael Werner]

False equivalence is a logical fallacy where someone incorrectly asserts that two things are equivalent simply because they share some characteristics, despite there also being substantial differences between them.

effectiviology.com+3
:

That would also apply to man-woman marriage vs. man-man marriage. But I guess yer catchin' on!