Idiot Howard Dean: 'Hate Speech Is Not Protected By The First Amendment' (I Beg To Differ!)

[NYcarbineer]

If you lefties think someone's speech is so darn hateful, surely you could easily defeat the argument using your words, logic and reason.

Or shall we ban speech which you cannot refute but with which you do not agree?

Yea, ain't gonna happen haters!

Should we ban flag burning?

 

[bripat9643]

That's right! Howard Dean is the epitome of an idiot. So called 'Hate Speech' (whatever that is) is indeed protected by the First Amendment. I can't say how many times in my life I called a negro a 'nigg*r' to his/her face and never was arrested for cotton picking hate speech.

As for Howard Dean....yeeeeaaaahhhhhhh
Howard Dean's Scream

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/04/idiot-howard-dean-gets-destroyed-claiming-hate-speech-not-protected-first-amendment/

Then why do you rightwing nuts complain about flag burning?

They say protected speech is only what they do, not what others they do not like do.

No they don't, Nazi, and you know it.

 

[Manonthestreet]

That's right! Howard Dean is the epitome of an idiot. So called 'Hate Speech' (whatever that is) is indeed protected by the First Amendment. I can't say how many times in my life I called a negro a 'nigg*r' to his/her face and never was arrested for cotton picking hate speech.

As for Howard Dean....yeeeeaaaahhhhhhh
Howard Dean's Scream

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/04/idiot-howard-dean-gets-destroyed-claiming-hate-speech-not-protected-first-amendment/

You knew it was only a matter time until some leftwinger said what they really think. They want to outlaw hate speech - meaning any speech they disagree with.

Mujahowarddean wants to lead you down the path Canada took where criticism of islam is a crime

 

[NYcarbineer]

That's right! Howard Dean is the epitome of an idiot. So called 'Hate Speech' (whatever that is) is indeed protected by the First Amendment. I can't say how many times in my life I called a negro a 'nigg*r' to his/her face and never was arrested for cotton picking hate speech.

As for Howard Dean....yeeeeaaaahhhhhhh
Howard Dean's Scream

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/04/idiot-howard-dean-gets-destroyed-claiming-hate-speech-not-protected-first-amendment/

Then why do you rightwing nuts complain about flag burning?

They say protected speech is only what they do, not what others they do not like do.

No they don't, Nazi, and you know it.

You might want to search 'flag burning' on this forum and see how many of your rightwing pals support it being a right.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Equal protection under the law?

Dean wants someone arrested who says, "I hate that (INSERT RACIAL PEJORATIVE)?

Seems reasonable. He seems like a very lucid and smart guy.

Certainly not an utterly full of shit ideologue.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Dean's tweet by itself was incorrect, but the context was Ann Coulter and appearing at Berkeley.

She has no 'free speech' right to speak at Berkeley.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Free Speech means free speech. Not labeling something you don't like "Hatespeech" and suppressing it.


This "Hatespeech" crap is just a tactic to suppress free thought.

PC way of doing things is exactly what Orwell was talking about: "Newspeak"

 

[bripat9643]

That's right! Howard Dean is the epitome of an idiot. So called 'Hate Speech' (whatever that is) is indeed protected by the First Amendment. I can't say how many times in my life I called a negro a 'nigg*r' to his/her face and never was arrested for cotton picking hate speech.

As for Howard Dean....yeeeeaaaahhhhhhh
Howard Dean's Scream

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/04/idiot-howard-dean-gets-destroyed-claiming-hate-speech-not-protected-first-amendment/

Then why do you rightwing nuts complain about flag burning?

They say protected speech is only what they do, not what others they do not like do.

No they don't, Nazi, and you know it.

You might want to search 'flag burning' on this forum and see how many of your rightwing pals support it being a right.

They are wrong about that. So what? Why bother me about it?

 

[bripat9643]

Dean's tweet by itself was incorrect, but the context was Ann Coulter and appearing at Berkeley.

She has no 'free speech' right to speak at Berkeley.

Sure she does. Berkeley is a public tax supported university. That means it has an obligation to allow all sides of an issue to express their views.

 

[GHook93]

That's right! Howard Dean is the epitome of an idiot. So called 'Hate Speech' (whatever that is) is indeed protected by the First Amendment. I can't say how many times in my life I called a negro a 'nigg*r' to his/her face and never was arrested for cotton picking hate speech.

As for Howard Dean....yeeeeaaaahhhhhhh
Howard Dean's Scream

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/04/idiot-howard-dean-gets-destroyed-claiming-hate-speech-not-protected-first-amendment/

I know you heard this on the radio they all speech is protected by the constitution, but they like you are wrong. There have always been limits on speech. For example, speech that may cause danger to others is not protected, such as yelling "fire" in a crowded building to cause a stampede. Speech that incites violence, which could be a public speaker telling the crowd to loot and kill white people and the crowd does that that. You can defame (which by slander or libel) without consequences. You can't make a threat of violence against a person, esp the President. The SCOTUS also stated obscene speech is not protected. This is usually associated with acts like walking around naked in public, but it could be speech like repeatedly screaming NIG.ER in a public place.

Now if hate speech remains only offensive then it is protected, but if it becomes an incitement of violence, defamatory or becomes obscene, then no it is not protected per se.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The left is making situational hate speech. It's hate speech depending on who hears it.

I can say "I don't want to go to your wedding" to a heterosexual couple. That's not hate speech. Say the same thing to a gay couple and it becomes hate speech.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

That's right! Howard Dean is the epitome of an idiot. So called 'Hate Speech' (whatever that is) is indeed protected by the First Amendment. I can't say how many times in my life I called a negro a 'nigg*r' to his/her face and never was arrested for cotton picking hate speech.

As for Howard Dean....yeeeeaaaahhhhhhh
Howard Dean's Scream

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/04/idiot-howard-dean-gets-destroyed-claiming-hate-speech-not-protected-first-amendment/

You're wrong as usual.

Institutions whether they be private or public are under no obligation to provide the extremely high level of security Necessasary to guarantee coulters safety while she serves up her usual grind, which to some is in fact highly provocative. So for that reason alone they can tell her to piss up a rope.

But they won't.

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/04/yaf-uc-berkeley-will-honor-first-amendment-face-litigation/

 

[NYcarbineer]

Dean's tweet by itself was incorrect, but the context was Ann Coulter and appearing at Berkeley.

She has no 'free speech' right to speak at Berkeley.

Sure she does. Berkeley is a public tax supported university. That means it has an obligation to allow all sides of an issue to express their views.

No they don't.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The democrat war on free speech rages on.

The fascist bastards seek to end all civil rights.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

You want some real hate speech?

Just mention the word Israel to the rabid leftist brownshirts who seek to prevent conservatives from speaking.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Go ahead and you and Seagal yell the N word in a public park in Watts and tell us what happens.

You're telling us what would happen in a society run according to the rules you favor - a society run by thugs. You're a thug, Fakey. You're a fucking Nazi thug.

Prove it. Be specific. Also please yell that N word is a classroom or in a supermarket or in front of the police station, then report back what happened.

Why would I bother proving it when you have admitted it?

You admitted that it was not free speech, so now you are trolling, I guess.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Dean's tweet by itself was incorrect, but the context was Ann Coulter and appearing at Berkeley.

She has no 'free speech' right to speak at Berkeley.

Sure she does. Berkeley is a public tax supported university. That means it has an obligation to allow all sides of an issue to express their views.

So I can go to Berkeley, tell them I want to do a speech, my fee is 20,000, and if you refuse I'll take you to court for violating my free speech rights?

Seriously?

 

[Mac1958]

HATE SPEECH is anything the left disagrees with. Fall in line, or be personally attacked.

Bingo.
.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Speech that incites violence is not protected by the first amendment. Perhaps that is what he is referring to?

Let's see if I've got this right. If a person voices an opinion different from that of the fascist leftist brownshirts, the fact that they react violently to it justifies squashing the rights of the speaker to voice an opinion because they have somehow incited such?

Damn. There is stupid and there is REALLY stupid.

That's right up there with blaming women for being raped.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

You want some real hate speech?

Just mention the word Israel to the rabid leftist brownshirts who seek to prevent conservatives from speaking.

You mean rabid neo-fascits alt right brownshirts. I am glad to fix it for you, so no need to thank me. The hard right antifas will never be allowed to end free speech.

I am sorry you are stupid, Jake, I really am.