ICE rioters getting arrested

[Marener]

Police have feelings too, you know.

A now retired police officer I know had a ne'er-do-well accuse his mother of prostitution.

Needless to say, he had to defend his mother's honor.

How did he “defend” it?

 

[Mac-7]

Says who? You actually believe you’re not allowed to insult cops? I bet a cop told you that. They lie all the time.

Not while they are in uniform performing their duties

Its seldom enforced but these are special circumstances

 

[Marener]

Not while they are in uniform performing their duties

Its seldom enforced but these are special circumstances

Bullshit. The first amendment isn’t suspended because you wear a uniform.

https://www.aele.org/law/2011all10/2011-10MLJ101.pdf

I bet a cop told you that. They lie all the time and a moron like you would just believe them and allow them to scare you into giving up rights.

 

[Mac-7]

Seems like you have a problem with the 1st Amendment.

The freedom of speech doesn't mean you're required to only say nice things to other people. I thought even you would have known that.

Not at all

I already offered one example of the nice ladies at the tax office not having to but up with crap, aka verbal abuse, from irate taxpayers

It applies to cops also

 

[Polishprince]

How did he “defend” it?

He hit the perp in the stomach with his baton. And then the perp had the nerve to accuse him of "brutality".

The story did come out and the alleged "brutality" was perfectly justified.,

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Trump

 

[Mac-7]

No, it isn't.

Its not an open and shut case, yes when its the cops your mouth can overload your asshole

Can I be arrested for yelling or swearing at a cop?

Police officers generally cannot arrest people, nor can the government prosecute them, simply for what they've said. But not all speech is protected.

www.nolo.com

 

[XponentialChaos]

Police have feelings too, you know.

A now retired police officer I know had a ne'er-do-well accuse his mother of prostitution.

Needless to say, he had to defend his mother's honor.

The 1st Amendment doesn’t ban speech that hurts your feelings, snowflake.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Not at all

I already offered one example of the nice ladies at the tax office not having to but up with crap, aka verbal abuse, from irate taxpayers

It applies to cops also

You say you don’t have a problem with the 1st Amendment and then describe how you’re against the 1st Amendment.

 

[JusticeHammer]

These arrests are often just unconstitutional attempts to suppress free speech. Protesting is a protected right.

You and the corrupt authoritarians don’t care about that.

Protesting is a protected right, not rioting. Arrest them all.

 

[JusticeHammer]

He provided clear proof that you’re fascist authoritarians.

Bullshit

 

[XponentialChaos]

Its not an open and shut case, yes when its the cops your mouth can overload your asshole

Can I be arrested for yelling or swearing at a cop?

Police officers generally cannot arrest people, nor can the government prosecute them, simply for what they've said. But not all speech is protected.

www.nolo.com

From your own link.

“Words alone—even profane, offensive, and insulting ones—directed at police generally won't be enough for disorderly conduct charges. These words are protected under the First Amendment. However, the Supreme Court has decided that true threats and "fighting words"—those that are likely to provoke someone into reacting violently or incite others to violence—are not protected speech. So, a defendant who yells profanities at an officer in a threatening manner or manner likely to provoke or incite violence can be charged with disorderly conduct (and perhaps other crimes).”

Why do you hate the 1st Amendment?

 

[Polishprince]

The 1st Amendment doesn’t ban speech that hurts your feelings, snowflake.

The police officer was just exercising his right to Free Expression by giving a firm rebuttal to the criminal. Protected action.

 

[Marener]

He hit the perp in the stomach with his baton. And then the perp had the nerve to accuse him of "brutality".

The story did come out and the alleged "brutality" was perfectly justified.,

Nope. Not justified at all. That cop should have been arrested for assault and battery.

Of course he wasn’t because cops can do whatever they want.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Nope. Not justified at all. That cop should have been arrested for assault and battery.

Of course he wasn’t because cops can do whatever they want.

Boo hoo.

 

[XponentialChaos]

The police officer was just exercising his right to Free Expression by giving a firm rebuttal to the criminal. Protected action.

Arresting someone who has not committed a crime isn’t “free expression”.

It’s police abusing their authority because their feelings were hurt and you defending it because you think freedom of speech should only apply to speech that you personally approve of.

 

[Mac-7]

You say you don’t have a problem with the 1st Amendment and then describe how you’re against the 1st Amendment.

I guess so

No rights are absolute

 

[Marener]

Boo hoo.

Constitutional rights matter to me.

But not to you.

 

[XponentialChaos]

I guess so

No rights are absolute

Spoken by someone who thinks people should be arrested for saying mean things to others.

 

[Mac-7]

From your own link.

“Words alone—even profane, offensive, and insulting ones—directed at police generally won't be enough for disorderly conduct charges. These words are protected under the First Amendment. However, the Supreme Court has decided that true threats and "fighting words"—those that are likely to provoke someone into reacting violently or incite others to violence—are not protected speech. So, a defendant who yells profanities at an officer in a threatening manner or manner likely to provoke or incite violence can be charged with disorderly conduct (and perhaps other crimes).”

Why do you hate the 1st Amendment?

It said words “generally wont be enough”

Which means not always

You crowd ate obviously emotionally and physically out of control

And its beginning to cost lives such as the killings in Minnesota by a lib against two democrat lawmakers