ICE Refuses to Release US Citizen.

Another one of those judge presidents we didn’t elect.
welcome-to-the-nation-ruined-by-maga-and-republican-voters-v0-c5z8tt75x7ve1.jpeg

in our country we have three co-equal branches.
 
It is bizarre to complain about "birthright citizenship" when clearly that is the ONLY claim to citizenship that any of European ancestry have.
 
So he is, to coin a phrase, an "anchor baby." A phucking phoreigner who happened to be dropped on U.S. soil, before heading back to his real home country.

Maybe the Trump Administration wants to use him as an example case to have the Anchor Baby interpretation of the 14th Amendment declared "bullshit."

I like it!
Do Elon next, that phucking phoreigner.
 
Hmmm.i

... who primarily speaks the Indigenous Mayan language Tzotzil, was visibly confused during his hearing. His mother said he had lived in Mexico from age 1 until four years ago, when he returned to Georgia.
The Chinese have been doing this by the millions.

The man was born here, removed as an infant and returned with a bunch of illegals. A Taliban terrorist was born in Louisiana.
 
No, the mother speaks English, it is her son who does not.
This is about the son being illegally held because he does not speak English.
But I live in New Mexico, and at least a fourth of the population does not speak English, like on the Reservations.
"his mother, Sebastiana Gomez-Perez, told reporters in Spanish."

One would think she'd tell them in English. So, he doesn't speak English either. WTF?
 
So, Trump doesn't have to obey any laws written INTO THE CONSTITUTION or made by Congress, if he doesn't like them?

That is the very definition of "Phucking Dictator"
Where was Trump mentioned in the link?
 
Wrong.
Yucatan Mayans are natives, while we Europeans are not.
It is we Europeans who rely on citizenship due to birth right.
The natives do not.
The Mayans used to live in North American, so they have natural citizenship rights if principles were followed.
Without anchor babies, then none of us from Europe would have any citizenship rights.
I’m white and I’m a Native American.
 
There will have to be some method of dealing with those born here and raised from infancy elsewhere. China has been doing that for deecades.
 
Wrong.
Yucatan Mayans are natives, while we Europeans are not.
It is we Europeans who rely on citizenship due to birth right.
The natives do not.
The Mayans used to live in North American, so they have natural citizenship rights if principles were followed.
Without anchor babies, then none of us from Europe would have any citizenship rights.
"To the victor go the spoils."

Sorry. Whether or not it was ethical or moral is unimportant now. We cannot change what was done in the past. This is our land now. Kindly deal with it.
 
And no Supreme Court case has ever said so. They hang their hat on a case that dealt with a man, Wong Kim Ark, who was born here of permanent resident alien parents. And as limited to the Chinese issue at that.
Did his parents come here on a legal visa? Not that I am aware of.....? Did his parents leave the USA and go back to China to live? Why yes, yes they did.
 
Did his parents come here on a legal visa? Not that I am aware of.....? Did his parents leave the USA and go back to China to live? Why yes, yes they did.


They were legal resident aliens when Wong Kim Ark was born.

The Supreme Court considered the "single question" in the case to be "whether a child born in the United States, of parent of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States."


 
They were legal resident aliens when Wong Kim Ark was born.

The Supreme Court considered the "single question" in the case to be "whether a child born in the United States, of parent of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States."


So if you have a residence here in the US, or reside in the US, even if your citizenship is elsewhere to a foreign country, your child born on our soil, is an American citizen, (unless born to a foreign diplomat)

Is what that says.....no?
 
So if you have a residence here in the US, or reside in the US, even if your citizenship is elsewhere to a foreign country, your child born on our soil, is an American citizen, (unless born to a foreign diplomat)

Is what that says.....no?
No
 
Before we go any further, what evidence are you intentionally leaving out?
So, you don’t actually have anything to say.

You’re just trying to impune the integrity of the OP by suggesting that there is something else.

Of course, this is part and parcel to Trump’s unConstitutional scheme to round up whomever he doesn’t like and imprison them abroad.

Which is a facist terror tactic.

No decent American should be trying to deflect, support or defend this lawless behavior.
 
And no Supreme Court case has ever said so. They hang their hat on a case that dealt with a man, Wong Kim Ark, who was born here of permanent resident alien parents. And as limited to the Chinese issue at that.

Your assertion is as idiotic as it is baseless.
 
Back
Top Bottom