Old Rocks
Diamond Member
Limbaugh is an obese junkie, a blowhard on the AM radio with zero acedemic qualifications in any field whatsoever.An opinion peice written by Phd physicists. But of course you prefer bonkers fake British Lords, and obese junkies on the AM radio.
I'm not an american so I really dont know anything about Rush Limbaugh but I would bet that he would make you look as stupid as you are if you had the temerity to actually discuss global warming with him.
but let's talk about Monckton. you dont like that he, as a Scotsman, is pissed off at England for changing the law on hereditary titles. I dont really give a shit about politics over there but I can understand why he might be upset.
next, you make fun of his Graves's Disease and the common symptom of bulging eyes. I suppose it is not a stretch for you to focus on physical deformities rather than intellect but I do find it rather odious and low class of you.
then, you make fun of his non climate science degrees. he is obviously much more intelligent than you, with more education, wealth and wit. I am not surprised that your pedestrian envy clouds your attitude towards him.
I would call Monckton a climate science historian. he knows much, much more than you on the subject. and probably more than most climate scientists. he also has the distinction of being a published author in peer reviewed climate science. Old Rocks, you are inferior to Monckton in every way. he would slice you up and leave you bleeding on every subject under the sun, perhaps with the exception on how to change a light bulb in the mill.
Even Scotland produces some lying sons of bitches, of which Monkton is one. As in his claim to have published a peer reviewed article. Here is the reality on that;
Monckton Has Published In The Peer-reviewed Literature - Real Sceptic
But he does say that he has published a peer-reviewed paper. The article he is referring to is “Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered” and was published in the Newsletter of the American Physical Society. And due to Monckton constantly claiming this article is peer-reviewed they saw the need to add the following statement.
The following article has not undergone any scientific peer review, since that is not normal procedure for American Physical Society newsletters.
They even went further than this disclaimer on Monckton's article. All subsequent submissions that are published in the newsletter section contain variants of the following statement:
This contribution has not been peer-refereed. They represent solely the view(s) of the author(s) and not necessarily the views of APS.
Mind you, similar statements have also been added to Newsletter editions that were released prior to the article Monckton submitted. Quite the act to do if these newsletters contain peer-reviewed articles. This would have caused an uproar in the scientific community if papers suddenly were marked as non-peer-reviewed. But nobody, besides Monckton, raised objections to these changes.
Monkton certainly does not have more education in science than I. I have finished classes in biology, geology, physics, and chemistry. The most advanced class I have taken is Eng. Geo. 470/570. I doubt Monkton has ever finished a 200 level class in science. His degree is in journalism, and his statements concerning science reflect that lack of education on his part.