I will not Bow!

[RoccoR]

montelatici, et al,

OK, if you say it is the "Law" and the Mandatory's interpretation, then ---

Not at the expense of the non-Jews as the Mandate clearly stated. I am in favor of a secular state where people have equal rights. What the Mandatory wanted. That is not the case in the areas Israel controls. The White Paper was the Mandatory's interpretation of the Mandate, hence the law.

(OBSERVATION)

126. When the second World War came to an end in 1945, it was not possible for the mandatory Power to give full effect to the policy set out in the White Paper of 1939. The League of Nations, to which that document was to have been submitted for approval, no longer existed. And the tragic fate of the Jewish people in Europe had created a demand that the Palestine problem should be examined again in relation to the needs of the survivors of racial persecution.

130. The Report was published in London and Washington on the 30th April. On the evening of that day President Truman issued a statement which read in part as follows:-

“I am very happy that the request which I made for the immediate admission of 100,000 Jews into Palestine has been unanimously endorsed by the Anglo-American committee of Inquiry. The transference of these unfortunate people should now be accomplished with the greatest despatch… I am also pleased that the committee recommends in effect the abrogation of the White Paper of 1939 including existing restrictions on immigration and land acquisition to permit the further development of the Jewish national home. It is also gratifying that the report envisages the carrying out of large scale economic development projects in Palestine which would facilitate further immigration and be of benefit to the entire population. In addition to those immediate objectives the report deals with many other questions of long-range political policies and questions of international law which require careful study and which I will take under advisement.”​

154. This decision was announced to the House of Commons by the Foreign Secretary on the 18th February 1947. In the course of his speech he said:-

“His Majesty’s Government have …been faced with an irreconcilable conflict of principles. There are in Palestine about 1,200,000 Arabs and 600,000 Jews. For the Jews the essential point of principle is the creation of sovereign Jewish State. For the Arabs, the essential point of principle is to resist to the last the establishment of Jewish sovereignty in any part of Palestine. The discussions of the last moth have quite clearly shown that there is no prospect of resolving this conflict by any settlement negotiated between the parties. But if the conflict has to be resolved by an arbitrary decision, that is not a decision which His Majesty'’ Government are empowered, as Mandatory, to take. His Majesty’s government have of themselves no power, under the terms of the Mandate, to award the country either to the Arabs or to the Jews, or even to partition it between them.

It is in these circumstances that we have decided that we are unable to accept the scheme put forward either by the Arabs or by the Jews, or to impose ourselves a solution or our own. We have, therefore, reached the conclusion that the only course now open to us is to submit the problem to the judgement of the United Nations. We intend to place before them an historical account of the way in which His majesty’s government have discharged their trust in Palestine over the last twenty-five years. We shall explain that the Mandate has proved to be unworkable in practice, and that the obligations undertaken to the two communities in Palestine have been shown to be irreconcilable. We shall describe the various proposals which have been put forward for dealing with the situation, namely, the Arab Plan, the Zionist’s aspirations, so far as we have been able to ascertain them, the proposals of the Anglo-American committee and the various proposals which we ourselves have put forward. We shall then ask the United Nations to consider our report, and to recommend a settlement of the problem. We do not intend ourselves to recommend any particular solution.”​

London,
July 1947

(COMMENT)

The Mandatory never approved the policy position in the 1939 White Paper. It was not, in any way, a facet of law. Further, the UK aborted the policy. The UK referred the matter to the UN, which culminated in the 1947 Recommendations that became General Assembly 181(II) (AKA: The Partition Plan).

For some reason, the pro-Palestinian side is always trying to attribute some violation of law to the Mandatory. They keep raising the issue of "civil and religious rights" to the equation. The matter of protecting and interpreting what those "civil and religious" rights were is something of a quandary (a state of uncertainty or indecision as to what to do in a difficult situation) given the irreconcilable difference cited. It was the Allied Powers, in 1920 (90 years ago), that stipulated the protections of "civil and religious" rights, and up to the Allied Powers to determine what those rights were and what constituted there protection. No one today knows what the 1920 version of those rights were, when they were bestowed and conveyed, ---- and ---- to a large degree, what impact they have today. Those rights, as they were understood then, were never really codified. Certainly, the "civil and religious" rights of the 1920's were considerably different than what we attribute them to be today.

One more time: The policies expressed in the 1939 White Paper were never approved by either the House of Commons (Mandatory per the Foreign Secretary), or the LoN Mandate Council (No Order in Council was promulgated), or by the UN International Trusteeship System under Chapter XII of the Charter. The British Foreign Secretary (A/AC 14/8 2 OCT 47) asked the United Nations (FEB 47) to "consider our report, and to recommend a settlement of the problem." Hence the recommendations (submitted AUG 47) of the UN Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP), and adopted by the General Assembly (NOV 47).

UNSCOP completed its work on 31 August 1947, with its members agreeing on the question of terminating the Mandate, the principle of independence and the role of the United Nations. There was no consensus, however, on a settlement of the question of Palestine. The committee considered two proposals on the question of Palestine: the majority and minority proposals. The majority of the members recommended that Palestine be partitioned into an Arab State and a Jewish State, with a special international status for the city of Jerusalem under the administrative authority of the United Nations. The three entities were to be linked in an economic union. The minority plan called for an independent federated structure comprising an Arab State and a Jewish State, with Jerusalem as the capital of the federation.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[aris2chat]

Then the Palestinians have lost and will never have any peace.

The Palestinians have already surrendered by being so weak and incapable of doing anything to hurt Israel, and the sooner they realize that they've already given up, the faster they can all move on with their lives and live in peace and prosper.

Hey buddy...

Palestinians surely didn't realize their "defeat" fast enough to save us both, poor NYC skyscrappers!!

Al Qaida was responsible for 9/11 not the palestinians.

 

[aris2chat]

Originally posted by SAYIT
Compensation ($30 bil) was offered 14 years ago and despite the willingness of the vast majority of Palestinians to accept it and move on.

How clueless a human being have to be to seriously believe and have the courage to post the statement in bold on an Internet forum?

At lest 92% of the palestinian people consider the ROR a non-negotiable point in any peace agreement.

God knows there is no shortage of "personal opinions" regarding this land conflict, but this is not an opinion, this is a fact that is not even open for debate.

Please, notice that even Kondor in his reply chose to ignore the main message of the post (it was Arafat's fault) and correctly put the "blame" where it rightly belong: on the shoulders of the palestinian people.

Sayit's insane statement, completely divorced from reality was too much cheap zionist propaganda EVEN FOR A FANATICAL ZIONIST LIKE KONDOR.

So anyone who supports Israel is a fanatical Zionist LOL.
Speaking of bolding extremely ridiculous comments LOL !

"Zionism is nothing more - but also nothing less - than the Jewish people's sense of origin and destination in the land linked eternally with it's name." Abba Eban Nov 3, '75

"We Arabs, especially the educated among us, look with deepest sympathy on the Zionist movement. We will wish the Jews a hearty welcome home." Emir Feisal March 3, '19

 

[aris2chat]

montelatici, P F Tinmore, et al,

I think you've again misread the script.

Actually, there was a Government and according to the 1922 British census resident Muslims and Christians were over 80% and Jews about 12% of the population.

"The 1922 census of Palestine was the first census carried out by the authorities of the British Mandate of Palestine, on 23 October 1922.[1]
The reported population was 757,182, including the military and persons of foreign nationality. The division into religious groups was 590,390 Muslims, 83,694 Jews, 73,024 Christians, 7,028 Druze, 808 Sikhs, 265 Bahais, 156 Metawalis, and 163 Samaritans.[2]"

1922 census of Palestine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the 1931 British census the overall population increased 36.8% but the Jewish population increased by 108.4% through immigration. But Muslims and Christians remained close to 80% of the population as late as 1931.

"The total population reported was 1,035,821 (1,033,314 excluding the numbers of H.M. Forces)[2] – an increase of 36.8% since 1922, of which the Jewish population increased by 108.4%.[1]

The population was divided by religion as follows: 759,717 Muslims, 174,610 Jews, 91,398 Christians, 9,148 Druzes, 350 Bahais, 182 Samaritans, and 421 "no religion".[3]

1931 census of Palestine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Suffice it to say, you are full of it and are just spewing Zionist propaganda which is not supported by facts and is in fact opposite of what the facts are.


It was never intended that the Jews establish a state for Jews in Palestine as the British White Paper of 1939 clearly states. You people have brainwashed and refuse to read source material so it is no surprise you rarely know what you are talking about. From the 1939 White Paper:

"It has been urged that the expression "a national home for the Jewish people" offered a prospect that Palestine might in due course become a Jewish State or Commonwealth. His Majesty's Government do not wish to contest the view, which was expressed by the Royal Commission, that the Zionist leaders at the time of the issue of the Balfour Declaration recognised that an ultimate Jewish State was not precluded by the terms of the Declaration. But, with the Royal Commission, His Majesty's Government believe that the framers of the Mandate in which the Balfour Declaration was embodied could not have intended that Palestine should be converted into a Jewish State against the will of the Arab population of the country. That Palestine was not to be converted into a Jewish State might be held to be implied in the passage from the Command Paper of 1922 which reads as follows

"Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that `Palestine is to become as Jewish as England is English.' His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated .... the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the (Balfour) Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded IN PALESTINE."

But this statement has not removed doubts, and His Majesty's Government therefore now declare unequivocally that it is not part of their policy that Palestine should become a Jewish State. They would indeed regard it as contrary to their obligations to the Arabs under the Mandate, as well as to the assurances which have been given to the Arab people in the past, that the Arab population of Palestine should be made the subjects of a Jewish State against their will.......The objective of His Majesty's Government is the establishment within 10 years of an independent Palestine State in such treaty relations with the United Kingdom as will provide satisfactorily for the commercial and strategic requirements of both countries in the future. The proposal for the establishment of the independent State would involve consultation with the Council of the League of Nations with a view to the termination of the Mandate.

[]The independent State should be one in which Arabs and Jews share government in such a way as to ensure that the essential interests of each community are safeguarded."[]


The Avalon Project : British White Paper of 1939

I would hope that this would shut you no nothings up with respect to the reason why the Christians and Muslims of Palestine believe they were betrayed and continue to fight so fervently for the return of their homes.

(COMMENT)

First, I could not care less about the census. It is merely raw data for further consideration. It doesn't drive policy.

Second, borders have two sides. One side of the border was Turkey, the other side was land it relinquished, as discussed. You're being naive if you think the territory was not relinquished to the Allied Powers. As far as the Treaty of Sevres is concerned, you are correct, it never went into full force, because of the Civil War on Independence fought by Ataturk to overturn it. Thus, it was a foundational document, yet not an enforceable document. However, as the had been in play for nearly four years, much of the details relative to the Middle East had already been put into practice. Thus, you will notice that the Treaty of Lausanne cites the Anglo-French Treaty (which incorporates the Syke-Picot Agreement) as the initial territorial reference. As for the Palestinians, they would have been better-off if the Treaty of Sevres had been brought into force. The language on rights is much stronger in their favor. But alas, the protections were left out of the Treaty of Lausanne.

Third, the 1939 White Paper is often cited by Palestinians, yet it is well known that the Paper itself was brought under scrutiny by the Mandatory (UK Government). The "White Paper" is not an enforceable agreement, but rather - a statement of policy under a given administration, subject to change or re-interpretation.

110. The Mandatory’s new statement of policy was examined by the Permanent Mandates Commission at their thirty-sixth session in June, 1939. the commission reported that:

“the policy set out in the White Paper was not in accordance with the interpretation which, in agreement with the Mandatory Power and the Council, the Commission had always placed upon the Palestine Mandate.”​

They went on to consider whether the Mandate was open to a new interpretation with which the White Paper would not be at variance. Four of the seven members

“did not feel able to state that the policy of the White Paper was in conformity with the Mandate, any contrary conclusion appearing to them to be ruled out by the very terms of the Mandate and by the fundamental intentions of its authors.”​

The other three members “were unable to share this opinion; they consider that existing circumstances would justify the policy of the White Paper, provided the Council did not oppose it.”

111. It was the intention of His Majesty’s government to seek the approval of the League Council for their new policy. This, however, they were prevented from doing by the outbreak of war in September.

SOURCE: A/AC.14/8 2 October 1947

While it was a close vote, in the end, the Mandate/Trustee Council voted against the interpretation that the 1939 White Paper "was in conformity with the Mandate." Thus, you can reduce the bold font and bright red color of your statement above. You simply didn't read far enough in history to know that the interpretation wasn't approved. And it wasn't likely to be approved after the war; given the wartime events against the Jewish population during the war.

Most Respectfully,
R

The Commission was a purely advisory body. Only the Council could change the White Paper's interpretation of the Mandate, which it did not. So you can whine all you want about what the advisory commission voted on 4 to 3, but it makes no difference as the interpretation of the Mandate by the British (as the Mandatory) was the law until, and if, the Council changed the interpretation. And, the Council did not change it and you have absolutely no idea what the Council might have done.

Beyond the White Paper the fact is that the the notes of the San Remo Conference and the Mandate itself clearly stated that: "it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine..."

The creation of a Jewish State on lands that non-Jews lived prejudiced the civil and religious rights of the non-Jews. So, the White Paper was correct in stating that the goal of the Mandate was to establish an independent state and that:[]The independent State should be one in which Arabs and Jews share government in such a way as to ensure that the essential interests of each community are safeguarded."[]

We all read it the first time. Repeating yourself is not going to retroactively get the thing passed.
It is not relevant. It did not pass. It did not conform with the mandate.
Find a new song. This one is old and highly out of tune.

 

[aris2chat]

The Commission was a purely advisory body. Only the Council could change the White Paper's interpretation of the Mandate, which it did not. So you can whine all you want about what the advisory commission voted on 4 to 3, but it makes no difference as the interpretation of the Mandate by the British (as the Mandatory) was the law until, and if, the Council changed the interpretation. And, the Council did not change it and you have absolutely no idea what the Council might have done.

Beyond the White Paper the fact is that the the notes of the San Remo Conference and the Mandate itself clearly stated that: "it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine..."

The creation of a Jewish State on lands that non-Jews lived prejudiced the civil and religious rights of the non-Jews. So, the White Paper was correct in stating that the goal of the Mandate was to establish an independent state and that:[]The independent State should be one in which Arabs and Jews share government in such a way as to ensure that the essential interests of each community are safeguarded."[]

Which is exactly how Israel is run today with arab muslim and Christian members of the Knesset having just as much right to speak their mind. Under an arab muslim government the Jews and Christians would be ethnically cleansed and mass murdered if they spoke out.

Forget the white paper it had no more basis in law than this forum does.

What about the rights of the Jews that lived in the area, didn't they have the right to free determination and the a national identity. It seems that you ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDISTS don't want the Jews to have any rights and would rather see them all mass murdered to allow for an arab spring bloodbath.

Not at the expense of the non-Jews as the Mandate clearly stated. I am in favor of a secular state where people have equal rights. What the Mandatory wanted. That is not the case in the areas Israel controls. The White Paper was the Mandatory's interpretation of the Mandate, hence the law.

In Israel there are equal rights. Palestinians in the WB don't have equal right with Israelis as they are not Israeli but palestinian.
Let palestinians choose to live in peace with Israel and let them take up the issue of their rights with the PA.

 

[montelatici]

Which is exactly how Israel is run today with arab muslim and Christian members of the Knesset having just as much right to speak their mind. Under an arab muslim government the Jews and Christians would be ethnically cleansed and mass murdered if they spoke out.

Forget the white paper it had no more basis in law than this forum does.

What about the rights of the Jews that lived in the area, didn't they have the right to free determination and the a national identity. It seems that you ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDISTS don't want the Jews to have any rights and would rather see them all mass murdered to allow for an arab spring bloodbath.

Not at the expense of the non-Jews as the Mandate clearly stated. I am in favor of a secular state where people have equal rights. What the Mandatory wanted. That is not the case in the areas Israel controls. The White Paper was the Mandatory's interpretation of the Mandate, hence the law.

In Israel there are equal rights. Palestinians in the WB don't have equal right with Israelis as they are not Israeli but palestinian.
Let palestinians choose to live in peace with Israel and let them take up the issue of their rights with the PA.

Non-Jews in Israel do not have equal rights and creating Bantustans and then controlling them was a failed policy of the white South Africans was a loser then and is a loser with respect to Israel.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The discussions of the last moth have quite clearly shown that there is no prospect of resolving this conflict by any settlement negotiated between the parties.

There are still many people beating that dead horse.

The epitome of insanity.

 

[P F Tinmore]

We intend to place before them an historical account of the way in which His majesty’s government have discharged their trust in Palestine over the last twenty-five years. We shall explain that the Mandate has proved to be unworkable in practice, and that the obligations undertaken to the two communities in Palestine have been shown to be irreconcilable.

It took these clowns 25 years to figure out that their stupid plan was going to blow up in their face. The problems were as predictable as the sun coming up in the morning.

Then the UN tried to fix the problem by suggesting a plan that was already rejected 10 years earlier.

 

[Kondor3]

We intend to place before them an historical account of the way in which His majesty’s government have discharged their trust in Palestine over the last twenty-five years. We shall explain that the Mandate has proved to be unworkable in practice, and that the obligations undertaken to the two communities in Palestine have been shown to be irreconcilable.

It took these clowns 25 years to figure out that their stupid plan was going to blow up in their face. The problems were as predictable as the sun coming up in the morning.

Then the UN tried to fix the problem by suggesting a plan that was already rejected 10 years earlier.

Rejected by whom?

 

[toastman]

Not at the expense of the non-Jews as the Mandate clearly stated. I am in favor of a secular state where people have equal rights. What the Mandatory wanted. That is not the case in the areas Israel controls. The White Paper was the Mandatory's interpretation of the Mandate, hence the law.

In Israel there are equal rights. Palestinians in the WB don't have equal right with Israelis as they are not Israeli but palestinian.
Let palestinians choose to live in peace with Israel and let them take up the issue of their rights with the PA.

Non-Jews in Israel do not have equal rights and creating Bantustans and then controlling them was a failed policy of the white South Africans was a loser then and is a loser with respect to Israel.

What rights are not shared by non Jewish citizens in Israel? Provide a link too.

 

[P F Tinmore]

In Israel there are equal rights. Palestinians in the WB don't have equal right with Israelis as they are not Israeli but palestinian.
Let palestinians choose to live in peace with Israel and let them take up the issue of their rights with the PA.

Non-Jews in Israel do not have equal rights and creating Bantustans and then controlling them was a failed policy of the white South Africans was a loser then and is a loser with respect to Israel.

What rights are not shared by non Jewish citizens in Israel? Provide a link too.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEHk1bLJCBw]Haneen Zoabi MK Talks About Israel Apartheid and Lack of Democracy - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Kondor3]

She can talk about Israeli Apartheid all she likes.

That doesn't mean that it exists.

The alternative perspective is that Israel walls-off a dangerous, savage, hostile population segment, whose militant organizations and leaders have sworn to destroy it, and to drown its citizens in the sea.

That's not Apartheid.

That's Common Sense.

 

[toastman]

Non-Jews in Israel do not have equal rights and creating Bantustans and then controlling them was a failed policy of the white South Africans was a loser then and is a loser with respect to Israel.

What rights are not shared by non Jewish citizens in Israel? Provide a link too.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEHk1bLJCBw]Haneen Zoabi MK Talks About Israel Apartheid and Lack of Democracy - YouTube[/ame]

Again, what rights are not shared by non Jewish citizens in Israel?
With a valid link, not some video of a woman giving her opinion

 

[Hossfly]

She can talk about Israeli Apartheid all she likes.

That doesn't mean that it exists.

The alternative perspective is that Israel walls-off a dangerous, savage, hostile population segment, whose militant organizations and leaders have sworn to destroy it, and to drown its citizens in the sea.

That's not Apartheid.

That's Common Sense.

Gotta give Tinmore credit. He's not afraid to go down with the ship.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Discriminatory Laws in Israel
See site for details.
Adalah - The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel

Civil Wrongs Law - Amendment No. 8 (Liability of the State) 1967 Occupied Territories 2012
Criminal Procedure Law - Interrogating Suspects - Amendment No. 6 Criminal Law and Procedures 2012
Income Tax Ordinance - Amendment No. 191 1967 Occupied Territories 2012
Israeli Prisons Ordinance Amendment No. 43 - Prisoner-Attorney Meet... Criminal Law and Procedures 2012
Israeli Prisons Ordinance - Amendment No. 40 (Meetings with Lawyers) Criminal Law and Procedures 2011
"Anti-Boycott Law" - Prevention of Damage to the State of Israel th... Civil and Political Rights 2011
Foreign Property Ownership - Israel Lands Law (Amendment No. 3) Land and Planning Rights 2011
"Admissions Committees Law" - Cooperative Societies Ordinance - Ame... Land and Planning Rights 2011
Citizenship Law - Amendment No. 10 Citizenship 2011
"Nakba Law" - Amendment No. 40 to the Budgets Foundations Law Civil and Political Rights 2011
"Foreign Government Funding Law" - Law on Disclosure Requirements f... Freedom of Association 2011
Law to Strip Payments from a Current or Former Member of Knesset du... Economic Rights 2011
Extension of Detention - Criminal Procedure Law (Suspects of Securi... Criminal Law and Procedures 2010
"Negev Individual Settlements" - Negev Development Authority Law -... Land and Planning Rights 2010
Absorption of Discharged Soldiers Law - Amendment No. 12 Education 2010
Land (Acquisition for Public Purposes) Ordinance - Amendment No. 10 Land and Planning Rights 2010
"Pardon Law" or "Amnesty Law" - Termination of Proceedings and Dele... Civil and Political Rights 2010
Regional Councils Law (Date of General Elections) Special Amendment... Political Participation 2009
Israel Land Administration Law - Amendment No. 7 Land and Planning Rights 2009
National Priority Areas - The Economic Efficiency Law - Legislative... Economic Rights 2009
Child Vaccinations and Child Allowances - Economic Efficiency Law Economic Rights 2009
Absorption of Discharged Soldiers Law - Amendment No. 7: Benefits f... Education 2008
Criminal Procedure Law - Interrogating Suspects - Amendment No. 4 Criminal Law and Procedures 2008
Criminal Procedure Law (Detainee Suspected of Security Offence) (Te... Criminal Law and Procedures 2006
"Ban on Family Unification" - Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law... Citizenship 2003
Law of Political Parties - Amendment No. 12 Political Participation 2002
Use of Hebrew Date Law Culture and Language 1998
Knesset Law Political Participation 1994
Basic Law: The Government Criminal Law and Procedures 1992
Second Authority for Television and Radio Law Culture and Language 1990
The Golan Heights Law 1967 Occupied Territories 1981
Interpretation Law Sources of Law 1981
Public Lands Law (Eviction of Squatters) Land and Planning Rights 1981
Basic Law: Jerusalem, Capital of Israel 1967 Occupied Territories 1980
Foundations of Law Act Sources of Law 1980
Religious Jewish Services Law Religion 1971
Law of Yad Yitzhak Ben-Zvi (1969) and Law of Mikve Israel Agricultu... Culture and Language 1969
Protection of Holy Sites Law Religion 1967
National Planning and Building Law -Limitation of Water, Electricit... Land and Planning Rights 1965
National Planning and Building Law Land and Planning Rights 1965
Broadcasting Authority Law Culture and Language 1965
Basic Law: Israel Lands Land and Planning Rights 1960
Israel Land Administration Law Land and Planning Rights 1960
Basic Law: The Knesset Political Participation 1958
Jewish National Fund Law Land and Planning Rights 1953
State Education Law Education 1953
Land Acquisition Law (Actions and Compensation) Land and Planning Rights 1953
World Zionist Organization-Jewish Agency (Status) Law Culture and Language 1952
Entry into Israel Law Citizenship 1952
Citizenship Law Citizenship 1952
Law of Return Citizenship 1950
Absentees’ Property Law Land and Planning Rights 1950
State Stamp Law National Identity Symbols 1949
Flag and Emblem Law National Identity Symbols 1949
Law and Government Ordinance, Article 18A Religion 1948
Defense Regulations (Times of Emergency), Regulation 125 (Closed Zo... Land and Planning Rights 1945
Trade with the Enemy Ordinance Culture and Language 1939

 

[Hossfly]

Discriminatory Laws in Israel
See site for details.
Adalah - The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel

Civil Wrongs Law - Amendment No. 8 (Liability of the State) 1967 Occupied Territories 2012
Criminal Procedure Law - Interrogating Suspects - Amendment No. 6 Criminal Law and Procedures 2012
Income Tax Ordinance - Amendment No. 191 1967 Occupied Territories 2012
Israeli Prisons Ordinance Amendment No. 43 - Prisoner-Attorney Meet... Criminal Law and Procedures 2012
Israeli Prisons Ordinance - Amendment No. 40 (Meetings with Lawyers) Criminal Law and Procedures 2011
"Anti-Boycott Law" - Prevention of Damage to the State of Israel th... Civil and Political Rights 2011
Foreign Property Ownership - Israel Lands Law (Amendment No. 3) Land and Planning Rights 2011
"Admissions Committees Law" - Cooperative Societies Ordinance - Ame... Land and Planning Rights 2011
Citizenship Law - Amendment No. 10 Citizenship 2011
"Nakba Law" - Amendment No. 40 to the Budgets Foundations Law Civil and Political Rights 2011
"Foreign Government Funding Law" - Law on Disclosure Requirements f... Freedom of Association 2011
Law to Strip Payments from a Current or Former Member of Knesset du... Economic Rights 2011
Extension of Detention - Criminal Procedure Law (Suspects of Securi... Criminal Law and Procedures 2010
"Negev Individual Settlements" - Negev Development Authority Law -... Land and Planning Rights 2010
Absorption of Discharged Soldiers Law - Amendment No. 12 Education 2010
Land (Acquisition for Public Purposes) Ordinance - Amendment No. 10 Land and Planning Rights 2010
"Pardon Law" or "Amnesty Law" - Termination of Proceedings and Dele... Civil and Political Rights 2010
Regional Councils Law (Date of General Elections) Special Amendment... Political Participation 2009
Israel Land Administration Law - Amendment No. 7 Land and Planning Rights 2009
National Priority Areas - The Economic Efficiency Law - Legislative... Economic Rights 2009
Child Vaccinations and Child Allowances - Economic Efficiency Law Economic Rights 2009
Absorption of Discharged Soldiers Law - Amendment No. 7: Benefits f... Education 2008
Criminal Procedure Law - Interrogating Suspects - Amendment No. 4 Criminal Law and Procedures 2008
Criminal Procedure Law (Detainee Suspected of Security Offence) (Te... Criminal Law and Procedures 2006
"Ban on Family Unification" - Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law... Citizenship 2003
Law of Political Parties - Amendment No. 12 Political Participation 2002
Use of Hebrew Date Law Culture and Language 1998
Knesset Law Political Participation 1994
Basic Law: The Government Criminal Law and Procedures 1992
Second Authority for Television and Radio Law Culture and Language 1990
The Golan Heights Law 1967 Occupied Territories 1981
Interpretation Law Sources of Law 1981
Public Lands Law (Eviction of Squatters) Land and Planning Rights 1981
Basic Law: Jerusalem, Capital of Israel 1967 Occupied Territories 1980
Foundations of Law Act Sources of Law 1980
Religious Jewish Services Law Religion 1971
Law of Yad Yitzhak Ben-Zvi (1969) and Law of Mikve Israel Agricultu... Culture and Language 1969
Protection of Holy Sites Law Religion 1967
National Planning and Building Law -Limitation of Water, Electricit... Land and Planning Rights 1965
National Planning and Building Law Land and Planning Rights 1965
Broadcasting Authority Law Culture and Language 1965
Basic Law: Israel Lands Land and Planning Rights 1960
Israel Land Administration Law Land and Planning Rights 1960
Basic Law: The Knesset Political Participation 1958
Jewish National Fund Law Land and Planning Rights 1953
State Education Law Education 1953
Land Acquisition Law (Actions and Compensation) Land and Planning Rights 1953
World Zionist Organization-Jewish Agency (Status) Law Culture and Language 1952
Entry into Israel Law Citizenship 1952
Citizenship Law Citizenship 1952
Law of Return Citizenship 1950
Absentees’ Property Law Land and Planning Rights 1950
State Stamp Law National Identity Symbols 1949
Flag and Emblem Law National Identity Symbols 1949
Law and Government Ordinance, Article 18A Religion 1948
Defense Regulations (Times of Emergency), Regulation 125 (Closed Zo... Land and Planning Rights 1945
Trade with the Enemy Ordinance Culture and Language 1939

No big thing Tinmore. It seems those laws apply to everyone, not just Palestinians.

 

[toastman]

Discriminatory Laws in Israel
See site for details.
Adalah - The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel

Civil Wrongs Law - Amendment No. 8 (Liability of the State) 1967 Occupied Territories 2012
Criminal Procedure Law - Interrogating Suspects - Amendment No. 6 Criminal Law and Procedures 2012
Income Tax Ordinance - Amendment No. 191 1967 Occupied Territories 2012
Israeli Prisons Ordinance Amendment No. 43 - Prisoner-Attorney Meet... Criminal Law and Procedures 2012
Israeli Prisons Ordinance - Amendment No. 40 (Meetings with Lawyers) Criminal Law and Procedures 2011
"Anti-Boycott Law" - Prevention of Damage to the State of Israel th... Civil and Political Rights 2011
Foreign Property Ownership - Israel Lands Law (Amendment No. 3) Land and Planning Rights 2011
"Admissions Committees Law" - Cooperative Societies Ordinance - Ame... Land and Planning Rights 2011
Citizenship Law - Amendment No. 10 Citizenship 2011
"Nakba Law" - Amendment No. 40 to the Budgets Foundations Law Civil and Political Rights 2011
"Foreign Government Funding Law" - Law on Disclosure Requirements f... Freedom of Association 2011
Law to Strip Payments from a Current or Former Member of Knesset du... Economic Rights 2011
Extension of Detention - Criminal Procedure Law (Suspects of Securi... Criminal Law and Procedures 2010
"Negev Individual Settlements" - Negev Development Authority Law -... Land and Planning Rights 2010
Absorption of Discharged Soldiers Law - Amendment No. 12 Education 2010
Land (Acquisition for Public Purposes) Ordinance - Amendment No. 10 Land and Planning Rights 2010
"Pardon Law" or "Amnesty Law" - Termination of Proceedings and Dele... Civil and Political Rights 2010
Regional Councils Law (Date of General Elections) Special Amendment... Political Participation 2009
Israel Land Administration Law - Amendment No. 7 Land and Planning Rights 2009
National Priority Areas - The Economic Efficiency Law - Legislative... Economic Rights 2009
Child Vaccinations and Child Allowances - Economic Efficiency Law Economic Rights 2009
Absorption of Discharged Soldiers Law - Amendment No. 7: Benefits f... Education 2008
Criminal Procedure Law - Interrogating Suspects - Amendment No. 4 Criminal Law and Procedures 2008
Criminal Procedure Law (Detainee Suspected of Security Offence) (Te... Criminal Law and Procedures 2006
"Ban on Family Unification" - Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law... Citizenship 2003
Law of Political Parties - Amendment No. 12 Political Participation 2002
Use of Hebrew Date Law Culture and Language 1998
Knesset Law Political Participation 1994
Basic Law: The Government Criminal Law and Procedures 1992
Second Authority for Television and Radio Law Culture and Language 1990
The Golan Heights Law 1967 Occupied Territories 1981
Interpretation Law Sources of Law 1981
Public Lands Law (Eviction of Squatters) Land and Planning Rights 1981
Basic Law: Jerusalem, Capital of Israel 1967 Occupied Territories 1980
Foundations of Law Act Sources of Law 1980
Religious Jewish Services Law Religion 1971
Law of Yad Yitzhak Ben-Zvi (1969) and Law of Mikve Israel Agricultu... Culture and Language 1969
Protection of Holy Sites Law Religion 1967
National Planning and Building Law -Limitation of Water, Electricit... Land and Planning Rights 1965
National Planning and Building Law Land and Planning Rights 1965
Broadcasting Authority Law Culture and Language 1965
Basic Law: Israel Lands Land and Planning Rights 1960
Israel Land Administration Law Land and Planning Rights 1960
Basic Law: The Knesset Political Participation 1958
Jewish National Fund Law Land and Planning Rights 1953
State Education Law Education 1953
Land Acquisition Law (Actions and Compensation) Land and Planning Rights 1953
World Zionist Organization-Jewish Agency (Status) Law Culture and Language 1952
Entry into Israel Law Citizenship 1952
Citizenship Law Citizenship 1952
Law of Return Citizenship 1950
Absentees’ Property Law Land and Planning Rights 1950
State Stamp Law National Identity Symbols 1949
Flag and Emblem Law National Identity Symbols 1949
Law and Government Ordinance, Article 18A Religion 1948
Defense Regulations (Times of Emergency), Regulation 125 (Closed Zo... Land and Planning Rights 1945
Trade with the Enemy Ordinance Culture and Language 1939

One last time. What RIGHTS do Non Jewish citizens share with the Jewish citizens of Israel.

 

[aris2chat]

Non-Jews in Israel do not have equal rights and creating Bantustans and then controlling them was a failed policy of the white South Africans was a loser then and is a loser with respect to Israel.

What rights are not shared by non Jewish citizens in Israel? Provide a link too.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEHk1bLJCBw]Haneen Zoabi MK Talks About Israel Apartheid and Lack of Democracy - YouTube[/ame]

If she does not want to have the freedom to be an arab women elected to the Knesset and the freedom to speak out, if she want to be a palestinian she is free to leave Israel.

She can be Israeli or she can be palestinian, it is her choice. If arabs want the advantages and freedoms of Israel, they must accept Israel as their nation. If they want to be under hamas or the PA laws and authority they can be palestinian. There is not reason for a palestinian to have Israeli right unless they accept that they are Israeli.

Palestine would not accept someone having a duel citizenship with Israel as one. They can even bring themselves to recognize Israel's right to exist.

 

[P F Tinmore]

What rights are not shared by non Jewish citizens in Israel? Provide a link too.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEHk1bLJCBw]Haneen Zoabi MK Talks About Israel Apartheid and Lack of Democracy - YouTube[/ame]

If she does not want to have the freedom to be an arab women elected to the Knesset and the freedom to speak out, if she want to be a palestinian she is free to leave Israel.

She can be Israeli or she can be palestinian, it is her choice. If arabs want the advantages and freedoms of Israel, they must accept Israel as their nation. If they want to be under hamas or the PA laws and authority they can be palestinian. There is not reason for a palestinian to have Israeli right unless they accept that they are Israeli.

Palestine would not accept someone having a duel citizenship with Israel as one. They can even bring themselves to recognize Israel's right to exist.

Why should she leave her homeland just because the government sucks?

 

[aris2chat]

Haneen Zoabi MK Talks About Israel Apartheid and Lack of Democracy - YouTube

If she does not want to have the freedom to be an arab women elected to the Knesset and the freedom to speak out, if she want to be a palestinian she is free to leave Israel.

She can be Israeli or she can be palestinian, it is her choice. If arabs want the advantages and freedoms of Israel, they must accept Israel as their nation. If they want to be under hamas or the PA laws and authority they can be palestinian. There is not reason for a palestinian to have Israeli right unless they accept that they are Israeli.

Palestine would not accept someone having a duel citizenship with Israel as one. They can even bring themselves to recognize Israel's right to exist.

Why should she leave her homeland just because the government sucks?

It is not about parties or government. She is talking about national identity. If she does not want to be an Israel, she is free to leave. If she wants to stay and be free to speak against the Israeli government, she can do so as an Israel, not as a palestinian.

Palestine does not want jews or Israeli spouses in their state to be. How should Israel accept someone who identifies as an enemy of Israel and jews?