I will not Bow!

Status
Not open for further replies.
:cuckoo:
I was looking at your map. Since we are talking about Palestine there is:

Safed - 1834, 1929
Jaffa - 1921
Jerusalem - 1929
Hebron - 1518, 1929

And we are talking about before the Zionist invasion I will use 1917 for the dividing line. That is when Britain landed in Palestine with the Balfour declaration in its pocket.

That leaves:

Safed - 1834
Hebron - 1518

Take that for what it is worth. It is your information.

Zionist invasion LOL. You are such an expert in Palestinian propaganda !

There was no invasion. The Zionist were invited by the British, the same British who ruled the land. There immigration was also fascilitated by the British. How is that an invasion?

Foreigners colluding with other foreigners to take over your country is not an invasion?:cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo:




So how about the foreign arabs that invaded Palestine not once but 5 times in total. What does it make them ? :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo:
 
Zionist invasion LOL. You are such an expert in Palestinian propaganda !

There was no invasion. The Zionist were invited by the British, the same British who ruled the land. There immigration was also fascilitated by the British. How is that an invasion?

many of the AshkeNAZIS were illegal immigrants to Palestine.




And the ISLAMONAZIS weren't, just as they weren't illegal immigrants in every country in the world.
 
Zionist invasion LOL. You are such an expert in Palestinian propaganda !

There was no invasion. The Zionist were invited by the British, the same British who ruled the land. There immigration was also fascilitated by the British. How is that an invasion?

many of the AshkeNAZIS were illegal immigrants to Palestine.

And besides, Britain's immigration policy was in direct opposition to the will of the people. This was a violation of the League of Nations Covenant, and the Palestinian's right to self determination.





Actually it wasn't it was as a direct result of the mandate that Britain was able to offer the muslims 98% OF THE LAND OF PALESTINE and Israel just 2%. Only to be taken away and a new offer of 1% made instead.
 
:cuckoo:
Zionist invasion LOL. You are such an expert in Palestinian propaganda !

There was no invasion. The Zionist were invited by the British, the same British who ruled the land. There immigration was also fascilitated by the British. How is that an invasion?

Foreigners colluding with other foreigners to take over your country is not an invasion?:cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo:

So how about the foreign arabs that invaded Palestine not once but 5 times in total. What does it make them ? :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo:

When was that?
 
many of the AshkeNAZIS were illegal immigrants to Palestine.

And besides, Britain's immigration policy was in direct opposition to the will of the people. This was a violation of the League of Nations Covenant, and the Palestinian's right to self determination.





Actually it wasn't it was as a direct result of the mandate that Britain was able to offer the muslims 98% OF THE LAND OF PALESTINE and Israel just 2%. Only to be taken away and a new offer of 1% made instead.

Being appointed as a mandate did not authorize them to violate the law.
 
I was looking at your map. Since we are talking about Palestine there is:

Safed - 1834, 1929
Jaffa - 1921
Jerusalem - 1929
Hebron - 1518, 1929

And we are talking about before the Zionist invasion I will use 1917 for the dividing line. That is when Britain landed in Palestine with the Balfour declaration in its pocket.

That leaves:

Safed - 1834
Hebron - 1518

Take that for what it is worth. It is your information.

Zionist invasion LOL. You are such an expert in Palestinian propaganda !

There was no invasion. The Zionist were invited by the British, the same British who ruled the land. There immigration was also fascilitated by the British. How is that an invasion?

Foreigners colluding with other foreigners to take over your country is not an invasion?:cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo:

Again, they were INVITED BY THE BRITISH WHO RULED THE LAND AND HAD THE AUTHORITY TO DO SO.

And again, there was no Palestinian country to take over. Doesn't matter how many times you say it , but there was no Palestinian state at the time.
For ***** sake, you don't even know WHEN Palestine became a country :cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo:
 
Zionist invasion LOL. You are such an expert in Palestinian propaganda !

There was no invasion. The Zionist were invited by the British, the same British who ruled the land. There immigration was also fascilitated by the British. How is that an invasion?

many of the AshkeNAZIS were illegal immigrants to Palestine.

And besides, Britain's immigration policy was in direct opposition to the will of the people. This was a violation of the League of Nations Covenant, and the Palestinian's right to self determination.

Can you quote the part of the League of Nations Covenant that Britain violated when they invited the Zionists?
 
Again, they were INVITED BY THE BRITISH WHO RULED THE LAND AND HAD THE AUTHORITY TO DO SO.

Many of the AshkeNAZIS were illegal immigrants into Palestine.

The British had a strict Jew immigration quota and their numbers coming in greatly exceeded that.
 
Again, they were INVITED BY THE BRITISH WHO RULED THE LAND AND HAD THE AUTHORITY TO DO SO.

Many of the AshkeNAZIS were illegal immigrants into Palestine.

The British had a strict Jew immigration quota and their numbers coming in greatly exceeded that.

Ashkenazis lol. Way to flush your credibility down the drain.

No one here cares what trolls like you have to say, why don't you go troll somewhere else ?
 
Zionist invasion LOL. You are such an expert in Palestinian propaganda !

There was no invasion. The Zionist were invited by the British, the same British who ruled the land. There immigration was also fascilitated by the British. How is that an invasion?

Foreigners colluding with other foreigners to take over your country is not an invasion?:cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo:

Again, they were INVITED BY THE BRITISH WHO RULED THE LAND AND HAD THE AUTHORITY TO DO SO.

And again, there was no Palestinian country to take over. Doesn't matter how many times you say it , but there was no Palestinian state at the time.
For ***** sake, you don't even know WHEN Palestine became a country :cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo:

What does the Palestine Mandate say?

...in any other country;...

... national home in that country;...

... for placing the country ...

...to assist and take part in the development of the country.

... interests of the community in connection with the development of the country,...

... the natural resources of the country...

...appropriate to the needs of the country,...

... develop any of the natural resources of the country,...

...for the benefit of the country...

...for the defence of the country,...

... natural resources of the country and to safeguard the interests of the population...

No antiquity may leave the country...

The Avalon Project : The Palestine Mandate
 
Ashkenazis lol. Way to flush your credibility down the drain.

No one here cares what trolls like you have to say, why don't you go troll somewhere else ?

Sorry, are many Jews not known as Ashkenazi? I didn't make this term up.
 
Foreigners colluding with other foreigners to take over your country is not an invasion?:cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo:

Again, they were INVITED BY THE BRITISH WHO RULED THE LAND AND HAD THE AUTHORITY TO DO SO.

And again, there was no Palestinian country to take over. Doesn't matter how many times you say it , but there was no Palestinian state at the time.
For ***** sake, you don't even know WHEN Palestine became a country :cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo:

What does the Palestine Mandate say?

...in any other country;...

... national home in that country;...

... for placing the country ...

...to assist and take part in the development of the country.

... interests of the community in connection with the development of the country,...

... the natural resources of the country...

...appropriate to the needs of the country,...

... develop any of the natural resources of the country,...

...for the benefit of the country...

...for the defence of the country,...

... natural resources of the country and to safeguard the interests of the population...

No antiquity may leave the country...

The Avalon Project : The Palestine Mandate

'Palestine' became a country in 1988 Tinmore. You need to revise your history

First you say Palestine became a country in 1924. Then you say they declared independence in 1948. You have no clue what you're talking about
 
many of the AshkeNAZIS were illegal immigrants to Palestine.

And besides, Britain's immigration policy was in direct opposition to the will of the people. This was a violation of the League of Nations Covenant, and the Palestinian's right to self determination.

Can you quote the part of the League of Nations Covenant that Britain violated when they invited the Zionists?

ARTICLE 22.

To those colonies and territories which as a consequence of the late war have ceased to be under the sovereignty of the States which formerly governed them and which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation and that securities for the performance of this trust should be embodied in this Covenant.

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations
 
And besides, Britain's immigration policy was in direct opposition to the will of the people. This was a violation of the League of Nations Covenant, and the Palestinian's right to self determination.

Can you quote the part of the League of Nations Covenant that Britain violated when they invited the Zionists?

ARTICLE 22.

To those colonies and territories which as a consequence of the late war have ceased to be under the sovereignty of the States which formerly governed them and which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation and that securities for the performance of this trust should be embodied in this Covenant.

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations

How did I know you would quote something that doesnt answer my question. Theres nothing in there about Britain not being allowed to assist immigration.

Fail.
 
P F Tinmore; et al,

Hummm, what law did they violate?

Being appointed as a mandate did not authorize them to violate the law.
(QUESTION)

Who wrote the law?

Did the plaintive take it before the International Court of Justice?

What government was involved?

Who had legislative (law making powers) and administration of Palestine at the time?

Most Respectfully,
R
 
Last edited:
Can you quote the part of the League of Nations Covenant that Britain violated when they invited the Zionists?

ARTICLE 22.

To those colonies and territories which as a consequence of the late war have ceased to be under the sovereignty of the States which formerly governed them and which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation and that securities for the performance of this trust should be embodied in this Covenant.

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations

How did I know you would quote something that doesnt answer my question. Theres nothing in there about Britain not being allowed to assist immigration.

Fail.

Nothing ever answers your question.

If my answer is not the one you want, you disregard it.
 
15th post
ARTICLE 22.

To those colonies and territories which as a consequence of the late war have ceased to be under the sovereignty of the States which formerly governed them and which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation and that securities for the performance of this trust should be embodied in this Covenant.

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations

How did I know you would quote something that doesnt answer my question. Theres nothing in there about Britain not being allowed to assist immigration.

Fail.

Nothing ever answers your question.

If my answer is not the one you want, you disregard it.

I asked you to show me where in the League of Covenants does it say that Britain was in violation when they invited and assisted in the immigration of the European Jews.
You absolutely did not answer that. Anyone can see that
 
How did I know you would quote something that doesnt answer my question. Theres nothing in there about Britain not being allowed to assist immigration.

Fail.

Nothing ever answers your question.

If my answer is not the one you want, you disregard it.

I asked you to show me where in the League of Covenants does it say that Britain was in violation when they invited and assisted in the immigration of the European Jews.
You absolutely did not answer that. Anyone can see that
It's like, if you ask Tinmore for today's stock quotes, he gives you yesterday's baseball scores.
 
Again, they were INVITED BY THE BRITISH WHO RULED THE LAND AND HAD THE AUTHORITY TO DO SO.

Many of the AshkeNAZIS were illegal immigrants into Palestine.

The British had a strict Jew immigration quota and their numbers coming in greatly exceeded that.

Ashkenazis lol. Way to flush your credibility down the drain.

No one here cares what trolls like you have to say, why don't you go troll somewhere else ?

It's amusing to see this Arab capitalize NAZIs when he posts Ashkennazis since it is his own brethren are are murdering people en masse in the Middle East just like the Nazis did. Meanwhile, I wonder what would have happened years ago if those Jews living in Israel could have gotten people from other lands to work for them, just the way they are doing today along with the rich oil countries in the Middle East. They could have turned these illegals Arabs away and told them to go back to their own poor surrounding countries and figure out how to support themselves.
 
How did I know you would quote something that doesnt answer my question. Theres nothing in there about Britain not being allowed to assist immigration.

Fail.

Nothing ever answers your question.

If my answer is not the one you want, you disregard it.

I asked you to show me where in the League of Covenants does it say that Britain was in violation when they invited and assisted in the immigration of the European Jews.
You absolutely did not answer that. Anyone can see that

:eusa_doh:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom