Bullshit. How many times has she been on fox and right wing radio? She puts out a right wing produced public statement every few days. She is as much a part of the right wing as any politician or pundit you might name.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
‘I Was Just Joking’: Media Apoplectic as Khizr Khan Attack on Donald Trump Goes Down in Flames
- Thread starter bripat9643
- Start date
Bullshit. How many times has she been on fox and right wing radio? She puts out a right wing produced public statement every few days. She is as much a part of the right wing as any politician or pundit you might name.
He is a petulant Rich Boy with no filters.By the way
There is another reason Khans connection to the Clinton's does not matter.
Trump has connections to the Clinton's! This argument you are pushing makes Trump a douchebag!
Trump isn't sucking Hillary's asshole like Khan is.
The way Trump is running his campaign, maybe he is?
The speech by Khan was easy to turn around.
There is nothing in the constitution that says we have to take in immigrants!
Also, who wish to wrisk the lives of their sons and daughters due to a policy that let ISIS sneak into this county with the other Syrian war refugees?
I just gave a clean outline on how to turn Khan's speech into Trumps weapon!
Now you may claim "therenis no theory" about who you can attack and as pertaining to the first amendment you are right.
But it does reflect you character and temperment to the the general public, which is the political issue at hand. Trump appears to be indifferent to veterans families. How will he treat vets and their families while in office is a question on most peoples minds. Especially in terms of how the VA has treated wounded vets recently.
You're mistaken if you believe irrefutable logic would stop the Dims and the media from attacking Trump. They would interpret anything Trump said in response as an attack. This was a Khan job. There's nothing honest or straightforward about it. Khan is a douche bag, as are the people who put him up to it. Honorable behavior simply isn't in their game plan.
Yes, you are right about the Dems trying to turn whatever Trump says into an attack!
But Trump should not help them with his statements! He need to learn how to invalidate or turn their claims around in his favor.
I seen him in the primaries. He knows how to do this intuitively.
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,135
- 47,286
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #103
By the way
There is another reason Khans connection to the Clinton's does not matter.
Trump has connections to the Clinton's! This argument you are pushing makes Trump a douchebag!
Trump isn't sucking Hillary's asshole like Khan is.
The way Trump is running his campaign, maybe he is?
The speech by Khan was easy to turn around.
There is nothing in the constitution that says we have to take in immigrants!
Also, who wish to wrisk the lives of their sons and daughters due to a policy that let ISIS sneak into this county with the other Syrian war refugees?
I just gave a clean outline on how to turn Khan's speech into Trumps weapon!
Now you may claim "therenis no theory" about who you can attack and as pertaining to the first amendment you are right.
But it does reflect you character and temperment to the the general public, which is the political issue at hand. Trump appears to be indifferent to veterans families. How will he treat vets and their families while in office is a question on most peoples minds. Especially in terms of how the VA has treated wounded vets recently.
You're mistaken if you believe irrefutable logic would stop the Dims and the media from attacking Trump. They would interpret anything Trump said in response as an attack. This was a Khan job. There's nothing honest or straightforward about it. Khan is a douche bag, as are the people who put him up to it. Honorable behavior simply isn't in their game plan.
Yes, you are right about the Dems trying to turn whatever Trump says into an attack!
But Trump should not help them with his statements! He need to learn how to invalidate or turn their claims around in his favor.
I seen him in the primaries. He knows how to do this intuitively.
What Trump should do is let his surrogates attack Khan. That's how the Dims do it. Obama remains above the fray while his media surrogates sharpen their knives for the kill.
By the way
There is another reason Khans connection to the Clinton's does not matter.
Trump has connections to the Clinton's! This argument you are pushing makes Trump a douchebag!
Trump isn't sucking Hillary's asshole like Khan is.
The way Trump is running his campaign, maybe he is?
The speech by Khan was easy to turn around.
There is nothing in the constitution that says we have to take in immigrants!
Also, who wish to wrisk the lives of their sons and daughters due to a policy that let ISIS sneak into this county with the other Syrian war refugees?
I just gave a clean outline on how to turn Khan's speech into Trumps weapon!
Now you may claim "therenis no theory" about who you can attack and as pertaining to the first amendment you are right.
But it does reflect you character and temperment to the the general public, which is the political issue at hand. Trump appears to be indifferent to veterans families. How will he treat vets and their families while in office is a question on most peoples minds. Especially in terms of how the VA has treated wounded vets recently.
You're mistaken if you believe irrefutable logic would stop the Dims and the media from attacking Trump. They would interpret anything Trump said in response as an attack. This was a Khan job. There's nothing honest or straightforward about it. Khan is a douche bag, as are the people who put him up to it. Honorable behavior simply isn't in their game plan.
Yes, you are right about the Dems trying to turn whatever Trump says into an attack!
But Trump should not help them with his statements! He need to learn how to invalidate or turn their claims around in his favor.
I seen him in the primaries. He knows how to do this intuitively.
Another tactic might be for him to just quit doing and saying stupid shit. I don't think he's capable of that though.
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,135
- 47,286
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #105
Puhleeze, the firm he works for did Hillary's taxes. He's more than just a Dim. He's an Hillary operative.Although I find myself wondering whether the Trump Camp can make hay out of these late-breaking revelations about Khan and his connections to the Clintons...
Revelations? You gotta be kidding me. So the man is a Democrat, Big deal. How many spoke at the republican convention that weren't republicans? You are trying to make something of nothing. I guess that's all it takes to stir up the crazies.
How many spoke at the republican convention that weren't tightly bound to the GOP?
Patricia Smith wasn't political in any sense of the word. I don't even know if she's a Republican. I just know she thinks Hillary killed her son.
Bullshit. How many times has she been on fox and right wing radio? She puts out a right wing produced public statement every few days. She is as much a part of the right wing as any politician or pundit you might name.
Did you imagine CNN or ABC was going to have her on every few days? She goes where she is welcome.
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,135
- 47,286
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #106
Apparently you aren't either.By the way
There is another reason Khans connection to the Clinton's does not matter.
Trump has connections to the Clinton's! This argument you are pushing makes Trump a douchebag!
Trump isn't sucking Hillary's asshole like Khan is.
The way Trump is running his campaign, maybe he is?
The speech by Khan was easy to turn around.
There is nothing in the constitution that says we have to take in immigrants!
Also, who wish to wrisk the lives of their sons and daughters due to a policy that let ISIS sneak into this county with the other Syrian war refugees?
I just gave a clean outline on how to turn Khan's speech into Trumps weapon!
Now you may claim "therenis no theory" about who you can attack and as pertaining to the first amendment you are right.
But it does reflect you character and temperment to the the general public, which is the political issue at hand. Trump appears to be indifferent to veterans families. How will he treat vets and their families while in office is a question on most peoples minds. Especially in terms of how the VA has treated wounded vets recently.
You're mistaken if you believe irrefutable logic would stop the Dims and the media from attacking Trump. They would interpret anything Trump said in response as an attack. This was a Khan job. There's nothing honest or straightforward about it. Khan is a douche bag, as are the people who put him up to it. Honorable behavior simply isn't in their game plan.
Yes, you are right about the Dems trying to turn whatever Trump says into an attack!
But Trump should not help them with his statements! He need to learn how to invalidate or turn their claims around in his favor.
I seen him in the primaries. He knows how to do this intuitively.
Another tactic might be for him to just quit doing and saying stupid shit. I don't think he's capable of that though.
regent
Gold Member
- Jan 30, 2012
- 10,459
- 1,148
- 245
I think the diplomatic corps realize their risk of danger at times.The POTUS is not 'hands on' with the Department of Defense.So by that reasoning Reagan was responsible for the safety of those 141 marines he lost in Lebanon.Oh, I dunno...Tell me about Pat Smith's political outlook. Other than a different party, how is she any different than Kahn?
Hillary was directly responsible for the death, and/or the top of the chain-of-command in the department that lost Smith's son?
Smith was a grieving mother accusing the person responsible for her son's death.
----------
Trump was not directly responsible for the death, nor at the top of the chain-of-command in the department that lost Khan's son?
Khan was a grieving father pimping-out his son's memory in order to make political fodder.
----------
Just a wee difference.
Hillary was not directly responsible for her son's death. That has been proven in countless investigations. I'm sorry if a grieving mother can't accept that. She has to deal with her grief in her own way. The fact that the right wing plays on her emotions to use her for a political weapon is disgusting.
She's responsible by definition. She was their boss, and she was responsible for their safety. When push came to shove, she let them down.
The SecState IS 'hands on' with the State Department.
DoD staff have a high expectation of combat death.
State staff do not have a high expectation of combat death.
Next slide, please.
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,135
- 47,286
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #108
I think the diplomatic corps realize their risk of danger at times.The POTUS is not 'hands on' with the Department of Defense.So by that reasoning Reagan was responsible for the safety of those 141 marines he lost in Lebanon.Oh, I dunno...
Hillary was directly responsible for the death, and/or the top of the chain-of-command in the department that lost Smith's son?
Smith was a grieving mother accusing the person responsible for her son's death.
----------
Trump was not directly responsible for the death, nor at the top of the chain-of-command in the department that lost Khan's son?
Khan was a grieving father pimping-out his son's memory in order to make political fodder.
----------
Just a wee difference.
Hillary was not directly responsible for her son's death. That has been proven in countless investigations. I'm sorry if a grieving mother can't accept that. She has to deal with her grief in her own way. The fact that the right wing plays on her emotions to use her for a political weapon is disgusting.
She's responsible by definition. She was their boss, and she was responsible for their safety. When push came to shove, she let them down.
The SecState IS 'hands on' with the State Department.
DoD staff have a high expectation of combat death.
State staff do not have a high expectation of combat death.
Next slide, please.
Especially when HIllary is in charge.
Puhleeze, the firm he works for did Hillary's taxes. He's more than just a Dim. He's an Hillary operative.Revelations? You gotta be kidding me. So the man is a Democrat, Big deal. How many spoke at the republican convention that weren't republicans? You are trying to make something of nothing. I guess that's all it takes to stir up the crazies.
How many spoke at the republican convention that weren't tightly bound to the GOP?
Patricia Smith wasn't political in any sense of the word. I don't even know if she's a Republican. I just know she thinks Hillary killed her son.
Bullshit. How many times has she been on fox and right wing radio? She puts out a right wing produced public statement every few days. She is as much a part of the right wing as any politician or pundit you might name.
Did you imagine CNN or ABC was going to have her on every few days? She goes where she is welcome.
I suppose it' important for a political operative like Mrs. Smith to get in the media as often she can
JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,761
- 2,220
The full impact of the news cycle on Khan will need a at least a full couple of weeks to see how it shakes out.The attack seems to have been pretty effective to me. Hillary is back up in the polls with some pretty decent leads
To see the final impact it has you have to give the 'reference' people that others personally know and trust enough time to dig into it. This word of mouth network carries more weight regarding known quantities than advertising does.
JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,761
- 2,220
On the contrary, this nation was founded for freedom loving people of all races and faiths that we chose to allow in.All Muslims and wetbacks should be deported. This country was not founded for them.
JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,761
- 2,220
Diana West: DNC 'Put a Sharia Supremacist on Convention Center Stage' - Breitbart
Don’t you people vet your speakers? Do you even realize now that by inviting Khizr Khan to speak you that put a sharia supremacist on centerstage at the 2016 Democratic National Committee Convention to endorse a candidate for president of the United States? Hello? Is that the message you want to send America — that the Democratic Party is also the Sharia Party?
I do not exaggerate. Young Capt. Khan’s ultimate sacrifice for this country is something all Americans respect and mourn. But his father’s sharia supremacism is something all Americans who defend the Constitution that Khizr Khan was waving around like a prop must learn is the ideological foe of that Constitution, just as much as Communism ever was
Don’t you people vet your speakers? Do you even realize now that by inviting Khizr Khan to speak you that put a sharia supremacist on centerstage at the 2016 Democratic National Committee Convention to endorse a candidate for president of the United States? Hello? Is that the message you want to send America — that the Democratic Party is also the Sharia Party?
I do not exaggerate. Young Capt. Khan’s ultimate sacrifice for this country is something all Americans respect and mourn. But his father’s sharia supremacism is something all Americans who defend the Constitution that Khizr Khan was waving around like a prop must learn is the ideological foe of that Constitution, just as much as Communism ever was
JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,761
- 2,220
Ogibilium, we all know how you libtards think Sharia law is funny.Diana West: DNC 'Put a Sharia Supremacist on Convention Center Stage' - Breitbart
Don’t you people vet your speakers? Do you even realize now that by inviting Khizr Khan to speak you that put a sharia supremacist on centerstage at the 2016 Democratic National Committee Convention to endorse a candidate for president of the United States? Hello? Is that the message you want to send America — that the Democratic Party is also the Sharia Party?
I do not exaggerate. Young Capt. Khan’s ultimate sacrifice for this country is something all Americans respect and mourn. But his father’s sharia supremacism is something all Americans who defend the Constitution that Khizr Khan was waving around like a prop must learn is the ideological foe of that Constitution, just as much as Communism ever was
When the hangman comes for you it wont be.
- Oct 18, 2011
- 22,787
- 13,217
- 1,405
Before the internet the Dims would have gotten away with their attempt to smear Trump, but now the major networks can't stifle embarrassing facts. This episode may just further cement Hillary's reputation for being sleazy and dishonest.
....Over the weekend and for the past few days since Khan spoke alongside his wife Ghazala Khan about their son, U.S. Army Captain Humayun Khan, who was killed in Iraq in 2004, media-wide reporters, editors, producers, and anchors have tried to lay criticism on Trump over the matter. They thought they had a good one, a specific line of attack that pitted Trump against the military—and supposedly showed him as a big meanie racist in the process.
But, as Breitbart News showed on Monday midday, that clearly was not the case. Khizr Khan has all sorts of financial, legal, and political connections to the Clintons through his old law firm, the mega-D.C. firm Hogan Lovells LLP. That firm did Hillary Clinton’s taxes for years, starting when Khan still worked there involved in, according to his own website, matters “firm wide”—back in 2004. It also has represented, for years, the government of Saudi Arabia in the United States. Saudi Arabia, of course, is a Clinton Foundation donor which—along with the mega-bundlers of thousands upon thousands in political donations to both of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaigns in 2008 and 2016—plays right into the “Clinton Cash” narrative.
Khizr Khan does not realize that his usefulness as a Democrat pawn is over.
JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,761
- 2,220
....coming out of your pie hole, skankmore lies
That should make you understand better why we don't take you serious.Nobody pays attention to Breitbart except the RW cult that would never vote for Hillary in the first place.
Look in the dictionary under "Malignant Narcissist"
But, but, but...OBAMA!!!!!
- Oct 18, 2011
- 22,787
- 13,217
- 1,405
Look in the dictionary under "Malignant Narcissist"
But, but, but...OBAMA!!!!!
......still blames Bush.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 429
- Replies
- 15
- Views
- 945
- Replies
- 25
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 279
- Views
- 8K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 440
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 2
- Replies
- 12
- Views
- 81
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 52
- Replies
- 41
- Views
- 273
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8296
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 477
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-