I want to help the right wing here, for a better understanding for some clarity!

"Woke" means conforming to the left's orthodoxy through strict adherence to their speech code.

"Socialism" in the context of Marxism is a step in the evolution to communism. Within the Zeitgeist today, the terms "socialism" and "communism" are often used to mean the same thing, to wit: a body politic in which private property ownership is abolished and the government is a command-control body. For the purpose of the discussion here, "socialism" should probably be understood to mean authoritarianism.
Like I said, every one of them have their own private definition , His woke definition is lame and means nothing , his definition of socialism suggesting it is somehow Communism or something like that is a hoot considering there never has been a communist country and there never will be. . One thing we both agree on, is there isn't any socialism in this country, or at least almost impossible to find. And there never will be. I mean really, when was the last time someone, anyone came up to you and said , you know it would be a good idea if all businesses were owned and run by the government and the sales of their production should all be designated to that government. Never happened, never will.
 
What is woke? Anything the DNC wants you to believe, men can have babies, children should have their genitals removed, masks are not necessary for Covid, then are, then are not, then are, and then are not anymore, really anything they want you to believe.

As for socialism, Bernie talks about socialism in Europe and Venezuela, like they are one in the same. Problem is, they could not be any more different.

So the same goes for their definition of socialism. Really, it is anything you wish it to me. All that can be known is that socialism, whatever it really is, is our only hope. But their definitions of things are mysterious and require much thought.

Is there a biologist in the house?

I think the reason they fail to give concrete definitions to words is because they don't wish to be held down by their definitions. For them, such definitions are like the Constitution which they say is a living and breathing and ever changing document. Again, it is anything they wish it to be.
This woke definition is goofiness at the highest extreme.
 
Your woke definition is a real hoot. Yours is different from most , silly and ridiculous to say the least, but entertaining. I think we are getting a picture of the right's ignorance and their choice to use that ignorance to communicate to the other ignorant people in their group. Their own special language. The right all have their own privater definition for both woke and socialism, problem is they do have a definition and that definition says theirs is stupid and lame.
Anyone is free to define "woke" as there is no cogent definition. However, I believe that those who claim to be woke are actually asleep (or in some mental state of altered reality).
 
Anyone is free to define "woke" as there is no cogent definition. However, I believe that those who claim to be woke are actually asleep (or in some mental state of altered reality).
There is no real word that exist that can be defined by anyone anyway they want to suit their purpose.
 

Forum List

Back
Top