I truly wonder in what year climate change deniers will figure out how dumb they've been along

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Nov 10, 2011
31,824
12,674
1,560
Colorado
Will it be the year when it is so clearly obvious the world is in climate turmoil that it took shoving the evidence down the deniers' throats to convince them? Them living in the environmental chaos?

For the sake of convenience and downplaying, climate deniers like to pretend that climate change is purely a Democratic Party issue when it isn't. People who believe climate change is real don't give a shit what Al Gore says about the subject. They care what science says. It is a global scientific issue with a broad consensus. Every leader on Earth currently in office believe it is a legitimate threat.

Republicans, I think, refuse to believe life on the earth has an impending expiration date. The idea scares them. They have to kid themselves into believing civilization will thrive the next couple hundred of years. Plus, they don't like admitting they are wrong.
 
Will it be the year when it is so clearly obvious the world is in climate turmoil that it took shoving the evidence down the deniers' throats to convince them? Them living in the environmental chaos?

For the sake of convenience and downplaying, climate deniers like to pretend that climate change is purely a Democratic Party issue when it isn't. People who believe climate change is real don't give a shit what Al Gore says about the subject. They care what science says. It is a global scientific issue with a broad consensus. Every leader on Earth currently in office believe it is a legitimate threat.

Republicans, I think, refuse to believe life on the earth has an impending expiration date. The idea scares them. They have to kid themselves into believing civilization will thrive the next couple hundred of years. Plus, they don't like admitting they are wrong.





Climate change has ALWAYS been real. What is not real is anthropogenic global warming. That is a total failure as a theory. You'll figure it out soon enough as you start to freeze your butt off.
 
According to Global Warming Scientists / predictors that should have alreafy happened... :p

2 words - 'Hockey Stick' :p

'Nuff said.
 
Will it be the year when it is so clearly obvious the world is in climate turmoil that it took shoving the evidence down the deniers' throats to convince them? Them living in the environmental chaos?

For the sake of convenience and downplaying, climate deniers like to pretend that climate change is purely a Democratic Party issue when it isn't. People who believe climate change is real don't give a shit what Al Gore says about the subject. They care what science says. It is a global scientific issue with a broad consensus. Every leader on Earth currently in office believe it is a legitimate threat.

Republicans, I think, refuse to believe life on the earth has an impending expiration date. The idea scares them. They have to kid themselves into believing civilization will thrive the next couple hundred of years. Plus, they don't like admitting they are wrong.





Climate change has ALWAYS been real. What is not real is anthropogenic global warming. That is a total failure as a theory. You'll figure it out soon enough as you start to freeze your butt off.
The ONLY reason you even believe that is because of republicans. They declare something and the rightwing media blindly follows the narrative. Fox News viewers think like a child does really.
 
Will it be the year when it is so clearly obvious the world is in climate turmoil that it took shoving the evidence down the deniers' throats to convince them? Them living in the environmental chaos?

For the sake of convenience and downplaying, climate deniers like to pretend that climate change is purely a Democratic Party issue when it isn't. People who believe climate change is real don't give a shit what Al Gore says about the subject. They care what science says. It is a global scientific issue with a broad consensus. Every leader on Earth currently in office believe it is a legitimate threat.

Republicans, I think, refuse to believe life on the earth has an impending expiration date. The idea scares them. They have to kid themselves into believing civilization will thrive the next couple hundred of years. Plus, they don't like admitting they are wrong.





Climate change has ALWAYS been real. What is not real is anthropogenic global warming. That is a total failure as a theory. You'll figure it out soon enough as you start to freeze your butt off.
The ONLY reason you even believe that is because of republicans. They declare something and the rightwing media blindly follows the narrative.






Nope. The reason I believe it is because I am a scientist. I have looked at the theory and it fails every test. It has zero empirical data to back it up and is wholly created in computer derived fictional models. That's it, and that ain't science no matter how much you want it to be.
 
Climate change is a natural thing, certainly not man-made… Fact
So in 60 years or so from now, how do you think the gobal population will turn out? Will humanity be thriving? Do you actually believe the earth's environment will be habitable to large populations?
 
Will it be the year when it is so clearly obvious the world is in climate turmoil that it took shoving the evidence down the deniers' throats to convince them? Them living in the environmental chaos?

For the sake of convenience and downplaying, climate deniers like to pretend that climate change is purely a Democratic Party issue when it isn't. People who believe climate change is real don't give a shit what Al Gore says about the subject. They care what science says. It is a global scientific issue with a broad consensus. Every leader on Earth currently in office believe it is a legitimate threat.

Republicans, I think, refuse to believe life on the earth has an impending expiration date. The idea scares them. They have to kid themselves into believing civilization will thrive the next couple hundred of years. Plus, they don't like admitting they are wrong.





Climate change has ALWAYS been real. What is not real is anthropogenic global warming. That is a total failure as a theory. You'll figure it out soon enough as you start to freeze your butt off.
The ONLY reason you even believe that is because of republicans. They declare something and the rightwing media blindly follows the narrative.






Nope. The reason I believe it is because I am a scientist. I have looked at the theory and it fails every test. It has zero empirical data to back it up and is wholly created in computer derived fictional models. That's it, and that ain't science no matter how much you want it to be.
What you are saying is so insane that it blows my mind. ZERO empirical data huh? I don't care what you think you are, you are so wrong and you're stupid to suggest you're an authority on the subject.
 
Climate change is a natural thing, certainly not man-made… Fact
So in 60 years or so from now, how do you think the gobal population will turn out? Will humanity be thriving? Do you actually believe the earth's environment will be habitable to large populations?
Man made Climate change all about control… Fact
 
Climate change is a natural thing, certainly not man-made… Fact
So in 60 years or so from now, how do you think the gobal population will turn out? Will humanity be thriving? Do you actually believe the earth's environment will be habitable to large populations?
Man made Climate change all about control… Fact
Who is doing the controlling? What do they want to achieve exactly?
 
Climate change is a natural thing, certainly not man-made… Fact
So in 60 years or so from now, how do you think the gobal population will turn out? Will humanity be thriving? Do you actually believe the earth's environment will be habitable to large populations?
Man made Climate change all about control… Fact
Who is doing the controlling? What do they want to achieve exactly?
Inhofe: Climate change fight really about global control
 
Will it be the year when it is so clearly obvious the world is in climate turmoil that it took shoving the evidence down the deniers' throats to convince them? Them living in the environmental chaos?

For the sake of convenience and downplaying, climate deniers like to pretend that climate change is purely a Democratic Party issue when it isn't. People who believe climate change is real don't give a shit what Al Gore says about the subject. They care what science says. It is a global scientific issue with a broad consensus. Every leader on Earth currently in office believe it is a legitimate threat.

Republicans, I think, refuse to believe life on the earth has an impending expiration date. The idea scares them. They have to kid themselves into believing civilization will thrive the next couple hundred of years. Plus, they don't like admitting they are wrong.





Climate change has ALWAYS been real. What is not real is anthropogenic global warming. That is a total failure as a theory. You'll figure it out soon enough as you start to freeze your butt off.
The ONLY reason you even believe that is because of republicans. They declare something and the rightwing media blindly follows the narrative.






Nope. The reason I believe it is because I am a scientist. I have looked at the theory and it fails every test. It has zero empirical data to back it up and is wholly created in computer derived fictional models. That's it, and that ain't science no matter how much you want it to be.
What you are saying is so insane that it blows my mind. ZERO empirical data huh? I don't care what you think you are, you are so wrong and you're stupid to suggest you're an authority on the subject.





Yes ZERO. Your mind is easy to blow because your understanding of science is so low. Consensus is a term of politicians. Not scientists. I would love to educate you one science and the scientific method but I truly don't think you're smart enough to understand the basics.
 
Climate change is a natural thing, certainly not man-made… Fact
So in 60 years or so from now, how do you think the gobal population will turn out? Will humanity be thriving? Do you actually believe the earth's environment will be habitable to large populations?
Man made Climate change all about control… Fact
Who is doing the controlling? What do they want to achieve exactly?





Absolute control over how you are ALLOWED to live your life. They want all of your money too. Here is the paper produced by the UN where they describe the process to completely change the energy distribution network of the planet. Their stated goal is to prevent a ONE degree rise in global temperature in 100 years. Pretty cool scam, you get to rip people off and they won't be able to figure it out till their long dead, but the kicker is there are absolutely NO draconian laws on the books to actually reduce CO2 emissions. None. You can continue to pollute, you just have to pay a super rich person for the privilege.

How much is this wonderfulness going to cost? SEVENTY SIX TRILLION dollars. Their estimate so very, very low.

http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/wess/wess_current/2011wess.pdf
 
Climate change is a natural thing, certainly not man-made… Fact
So in 60 years or so from now, how do you think the gobal population will turn out? Will humanity be thriving? Do you actually believe the earth's environment will be habitable to large populations?
Man made Climate change all about control… Fact
Who is doing the controlling? What do they want to achieve exactly?
Inhofe: Climate change fight really about global control
Summarize what this article is claiming.
 
Will it be the year when it is so clearly obvious the world is in climate turmoil that it took shoving the evidence down the deniers' throats to convince them? Them living in the environmental chaos?

For the sake of convenience and downplaying, climate deniers like to pretend that climate change is purely a Democratic Party issue when it isn't. People who believe climate change is real don't give a shit what Al Gore says about the subject. They care what science says. It is a global scientific issue with a broad consensus. Every leader on Earth currently in office believe it is a legitimate threat.

Republicans, I think, refuse to believe life on the earth has an impending expiration date. The idea scares them. They have to kid themselves into believing civilization will thrive the next couple hundred of years. Plus, they don't like admitting they are wrong.





Climate change has ALWAYS been real. What is not real is anthropogenic global warming. That is a total failure as a theory. You'll figure it out soon enough as you start to freeze your butt off.
The ONLY reason you even believe that is because of republicans. They declare something and the rightwing media blindly follows the narrative.






Nope. The reason I believe it is because I am a scientist. I have looked at the theory and it fails every test. It has zero empirical data to back it up and is wholly created in computer derived fictional models. That's it, and that ain't science no matter how much you want it to be.
What you are saying is so insane that it blows my mind. ZERO empirical data huh? I don't care what you think you are, you are so wrong and you're stupid to suggest you're an authority on the subject.





Yes ZERO. Your mind is easy to blow because your understanding of science is so low. Consensus is a term of politicians. Not scientists. I would love to educate you one science and the scientific method but I truly don't think you're smart enough to understand the basics.
How about this? Explain - with specifics and examples - why climate change research hasn't been created through the scientific method.
 
Climate change is a natural thing, certainly not man-made… Fact
So in 60 years or so from now, how do you think the gobal population will turn out? Will humanity be thriving? Do you actually believe the earth's environment will be habitable to large populations?
Man made Climate change all about control… Fact
Who is doing the controlling? What do they want to achieve exactly?
Inhofe: Climate change fight really about global control
Summarize what this article is claiming.





Read it for yourself. Break out a dictionary if you need help understanding his words.
 

Forum List

Back
Top