Descendants of slaves the same way we'd pay out settlements to next of kins.
In this case, however, you expect people who had nothign to do with slavery to payout settlements 150+ years later to people who where not enslaved. How is this governent working for "us"?
If you robbed and murdered a man do you get to keep his shit or does that go back to his wife or children or grandchildren or closest living relative?
What do I have that came from a slave?
How is a person who was not a slave entitled to what I have?
I get these things are against your interests, moron but they are certainly within mine.
You said "us"
That means everyone.
You cannot soundly explain how it is in everyone's interests for people who had nothing to do with slavery pay reparations to people who were not slaves.
I believe citizens are responsible for the actions of their government.
How does this make people who had nothing to do with slavery liable for slavery?
How is forcing them to pay benefits to people who wer enot slaves an example of government working for "us"?
I doubt you could respond to any of the points I just made unless you want to attack the very notion of legal compensation.
Its YOUR position, its up to you to defend it. So far you have failed, utterly, in that you have not soundly demonstrated how peopel who were never slaves wee harmed by slavery and how people who never had slaves owe them something for it.
And I have, quite clearly and by any yardstick, responded to all of the posts you made.
In the part we all get to vote what kind of government we want genius.
- When you have a government that forces people to pay for actions they did not take to people who were not harmed, you no longer have a government instituted to secure the people's rights to life, liberty, property and self-determination.
- When you have a government that forces people to pay for goods and services received by others w/o compensation, creating a condition of state-enforced involuntary servitude, you no longer have a government instituted to secure the people's rights to life, liberty, property and self-determination.
That is, you no longer have democracy as created in this country - you have mob rule.
So, I ask again:
Where in there is the idea that the state not just can, but should, force people to pay for the goods and services consumed by others?
Oh, but you did.
You plan to "[tear] down your flag and statues and [piss] all over your history and culture" -- and there's nothing "we" can do about it.
Indeed, you believe people flying the ANV batte flag help you "draw support for tearing down your culture and its deplorable symbols"
So, I ask again:
Why do you believe your outrage gives you the moral and legal authority to deny people you disagree with their right to express an opinion you does not like --- violently, if necessary?