A pandemic with a 99.9% survival rate. Wow, tinfoil hat?
Here's how I get a 2% case-fatality rate (which is a lot more than your 0.1% rate). This past week I read some epidemiologists are estimating 15% of the public has caught COVID. On a population of 330 million, that would be 50 million people. That many people divided by the 275,000 who have supposedly died of COVID and you get 1.8% -- call it 2% to round up. Can anyone check my work?
That is with the number of people who have TESTED positive.
But with more universal testing at some confined sites, like elderly facilities, prisons, army bases, etc., they are finding 90% of the infected are asymptomatic, so never got tested.
Then that 1.8% turns into 0.18%.
This is important because Fauci estimated a death toll of 4 million if we tried for herd immunity.
If most people are asymptomatic, then they are also inherently immune already, so then when Fauci said 70% of the people would need to get infected to gain immunity, it really is more like 7%.
Finally, since those over 70 are 40 times more likely to die, you can reduce Fauci's estimate by a factor of 40 is you only accept young and healthy volunteers for deliberate infection.
The PCR test is more of a fraudulent test then calling healthy people asymptomatic. They refuse to admit the PCR test is not meant to test for a virus so they call the people who test negative asymptomatic:
“Stay of Action” Filed Against FDA to STOP Approval of COVID Vaccine for Using Faulty PCR Tests in Trials.
An ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION has been filed with the Department of Health and Human Services and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the new Pfizer COVID vaccine that has been submitted for "emergency use authorization" (EUA). It is widely expected that the FDA is going to grant EUA...
vaccineimpact.com
Here’s the problem, we are testing people for any strain of a Coronavirus. Not specifically for COVID-19. There are no reliable tests for a specific COVID-19 virus. There are no reliable agencies or media outlets for reporting numbers of actual COVID-19 virus cases. This needs to be addressed first and foremost. Every action and reaction to COVID-19 is based on totally flawed data and we simply can not make accurate assessments.
This is why you’re hearing that most people with COVID-19 are showing nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. That’s because most Coronavirus strains are nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. The few actual novel Coronavirus cases do have some worse respiratory responses, but still have a very promising recovery rate, especially for those without prior issues.
The ‘gold standard’ in testing for COVID-19 is laboratory isolated/purified coronavirus particles free from any contaminants and particles that look like viruses but are not, that have been proven to be the cause of the syndrome known as COVID-19 and obtained by using proper viral isolation methods and controls (not the PCR that is currently being used or Serology /antibody tests which do not detect virus as such). PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome.
The problem is the test is known not to work.
It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analyzed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery.
Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.
The Mickey Mouse test kits being sent out to hospitals, at best, tell analysts you have some viral DNA in your cells. Which most of us do, most of the time. It may tell you the viral sequence is related to a specific type of virus – say the huge family of coronavirus. But that’s all. The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense
And that’s not even getting into the other issue – viral load.
If you remember the PCR works by amplifying minute amounts of DNA. It therefore is useless at telling you how much virus you may have. And that’s the only question that really matters when it comes to diagnosing illness. Everyone will have a few virus kicking round in their system at any time, and most will not cause illness because their quantities are too small. For a virus to sicken you you need a lot of it, a massive amount of it. But PCR does not test viral load and therefore can’t determine if it is present in sufficient quantities to sicken you.
If you feel sick and get a PCR test any random virus DNA might be identified even if they aren’t at all involved in your sickness which leads to false diagnosis.
And coronavirus are incredibly common. A large percentage of the world human population will have covi DNA in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with some other pathogen.
Do you see where this is going yet? If you want to create a totally false panic about a totally false pandemic – pick a coronavirus.
Investigating the Germ Theory, 5G, Viruses, Vaccines & the ‘coronavirus’.
entityart.co.uk
www.cdc.gov
