I propose to build a statue of the Great Reagan next to the statue of liberty

[rupol2000]

Reagan will extend his hand, showing the Way. The symbolism of the composition lies in the fact that Freedom raised the torch, which sanctified the way to Freedom for the Great Reagan, and he pointed it out to us.

 

[1srelluc]

Given how he rolled over to the dems on immigration it's fitting.

 

[Mac1958]

Reagan would be considered an evil RINO today.

 

[WinterBorn]

Reagan will extend his hand, showing the Way. The symbolism of the composition lies in the fact that Freedom raised the torch, which sanctified the way to Freedom for the Great Reagan, and he pointed it out to us.

Well, you get just as much say as any other foreign citizen who does not live in the US. None.

 

[RodISHI]

Reagan helped hold the door open for many of the beast we now have to deal with. His statute would have to be at the opening to the gates of hell.

BIOTECHNOLOGY REGULATIONS ARE SIGNED BY REAGAN (Published 1986)

www.nytimes.com

...several prominent biologists said they were anxious about various aspects of the new guidelines, including a section dealing with ''regulator genes,'' the genes that control functions in single genes or groups of genes. Under the Administration's new policy, alterations in the functions of regulator genes would not be subject to rigorous review.

Dr. Liebe Cavalieri, a molecular biologist and cancer researcher at the Sloane-Kettering Institute in Rye, N.Y., said that regulator genes perform an invaluable function, acting like an electric light dimmer or a thermostat to increase or decrease the production of proteins in cells. Controlling the functions of regulator genes is one of the primary goals of bioengineers. Dr. Cavalieri said the Administration's guidelines treat regulatory genes as ''biologically unimportant,'' and that not subjecting them to rigorous oversight ''is foolish.''

 

[TNHarley]

 

[Moonglow]

We all can't be as great as Reagan wasn't.

 

[rupol2000]

Reagan would be considered an evil RINO today.

It's not at all surprising that RINO-fagots declare real right RINO's and vote for fag marriages. Did you surprise me with this? Not at all.

 

[rupol2000]

Reagan helped hold the door open for many of the beast we now have to deal with. His statute would have to be at the opening to the gates of hell.

BIOTECHNOLOGY REGULATIONS ARE SIGNED BY REAGAN (Published 1986)

www.nytimes.com

...several prominent biologists said they were anxious about various aspects of the new guidelines, including a section dealing with ''regulator genes,'' the genes that control functions in single genes or groups of genes. Under the Administration's new policy, alterations in the functions of regulator genes would not be subject to rigorous review.

Dr. Liebe Cavalieri, a molecular biologist and cancer researcher at the Sloane-Kettering Institute in Rye, N.Y., said that regulator genes perform an invaluable function, acting like an electric light dimmer or a thermostat to increase or decrease the production of proteins in cells. Controlling the functions of regulator genes is one of the primary goals of bioengineers. Dr. Cavalieri said the Administration's guidelines treat regulatory genes as ''biologically unimportant,'' and that not subjecting them to rigorous oversight ''is foolish.''

I didn't understand your message. Do you think that Americans want to be poisoned with genetically modified shit?

 

[August West]

It's not at all surprising that RINO-fagots declare real right RINO's and vote for fag marriages. Did you surprise me with this? Not at all.

You`re having gay fantasies today? Take them elsewhere if you don`t mind. We don`t care about your Private Life or whatever his name is.

 

[rupol2000]

You`re having gay fantasies today? Take them elsewhere if you don`t mind. We don`t care about your Private Life or whatever his name is.

You don't even know how your masters vote, who you are sucking?

Same-Sex Marriage Bill, Considered Dead on Arrival, Gains New Life

The larger-than-expected G.O.P. vote in the House in support of legislation to codify marriage equality caught both parties off guard, suggesting there could be a narrow path to enactment.

www.nytimes.com