I Predict That The Supremes Are Going To Ignore The Constitution And Allow The 14th To Still Apply To Anchor Babies

[mudwhistle]

As we speak arguments are before the Supreme Court that the 14th Amendment was only created to apply to children of slaves, not anyone else.

However, I think the court is going to ignore reality and rule to allow illegals to continue remaining legally in the US.....because they think it would be too difficult to enforce the law correctly.

On a side note, they're really arguing over district judges trying to block the Trump Adm from removing illegals.

This is a very important issue.....and how the judges rule will show us exactly what's going on inside the court.

Is the fix in, or are they going to do their duty to defend the constitution?

14th Amendment: Simplified Summary, Text & Impact | HISTORY

The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1868, granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States—including former slaves—and guaranteed all citizens “equal protection of the laws.”

www.history.com

 

[rightwinger]

They will follow the amendment which allows birthright citizenship

 

[debbiedowner]

U.S. Constitution - Fourteenth Amendment | Resources | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

The original text of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.

constitution.congress.gov

​

Fourteenth Amendment​

Fourteenth Amendment Explained

Section 1​

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

What you posted is a summary and says "including slaves" meaning not just for slaves.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

U.S. Constitution - Fourteenth Amendment | Resources | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

The original text of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.

constitution.congress.gov

​

Fourteenth Amendment​

Fourteenth Amendment Explained

Section 1​

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

What you posted is a summary and says "including slaves" meaning not just for slaves.

At the beginning of the Constitution it reads "We the People of the United States of America". I guess the founding fathers didnt think that people as stupid as you would not think every start of every amendment shouldnt need that preamble.

But because of the Democrats who had slaves before the civil war, they fought to keep slaves during the war, and then formed the KKK to keep ex slaves in terror, the 14th amendment had to provide protections against the Democrats because they didnt want free black people. Nothing has changed with the Democrat party.

 

[Darkwind]

As we speak arguments are before the Supreme Court that the 14th Amendment was only created to apply to children of slaves, not anyone else.

However, I think the court is going to ignore reality and rule to allow illegals to continue remaining legally in the US.....because they think it would be too difficult to enforce the law correctly.

On a side note, they're really arguing over district judges trying to block the Trump Adm from removing illegals.

This is a very important issue.....and how the judges rule will show us exactly what's going on inside the court.

Is the fix in, or are they going to do their duty to defend the constitution?

14th Amendment: Simplified Summary, Text & Impact | HISTORY

The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1868, granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States—including former slaves—and guaranteed all citizens “equal protection of the laws.”

www.history.com

I think that the 14th Amendment should be repealed.

No person born in the USA of an illegal should be granted citizenship, but that requires an Amendment process.

I am not now, and never will be, okay with a President just changing a Constitutional Amendment with an EO/EA.

 

[mudwhistle]

I think that the 14th Amendment should be repealed.

No person born in the USA of an illegal should be granted citizenship, but that requires an Amendment process.

I am not now, and never will be, okay with a President just changing a Constitutional Amendment with an EO/EA.

It doesn't need to be repealed. But we may have to just to eliminate the misuse of it.

 

[Darkwind]

It doesn't need to be repealed. But we may have to just to eliminate the misuse of it.

Well, an Amendment to the Constitution is part of the Constitution.

I get it that the left are hypocrites with regards to following and enforcing the Amendments. Hell, they don't even pay lip service to several of them in the Bill of rights, particularly the 8th and 10th.

That doesn't mean I want future Presidents just waving a pen and doing away with or altering them to fit the cause of the day.

I think that birthright citizenship should be granted only to a child born to at least ONE parent who is a citizen, or if the parent is a legalized and/or naturalized citizen.

If neither parent is a citizen, then kick the kid out, too.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

As we speak arguments are before the Supreme Court that the 14th Amendment was only created to apply to children of slaves, not anyone else.

However, I think the court is going to ignore reality and rule to allow illegals to continue remaining legally in the US.....because they think it would be too difficult to enforce the law correctly.

On a side note, they're really arguing over district judges trying to block the Trump Adm from removing illegals.

This is a very important issue.....and how the judges rule will show us exactly what's going on inside the court.

Is the fix in, or are they going to do their duty to defend the constitution?

14th Amendment: Simplified Summary, Text & Impact | HISTORY

The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1868, granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States—including former slaves—and guaranteed all citizens “equal protection of the laws.”

www.history.com

6-3 or 5-4 with Amy and Lolita Island Roberts joining the DEI progressives

 

[Rawley]

As we speak arguments are before the Supreme Court that the 14th Amendment was only created to apply to children of slaves, not anyone else.

However, I think the court is going to ignore reality and rule to allow illegals to continue remaining legally in the US.....because they think it would be too difficult to enforce the law correctly.

On a side note, they're really arguing over district judges trying to block the Trump Adm from removing illegals.

This is a very important issue.....and how the judges rule will show us exactly what's going on inside the court.

Is the fix in, or are they going to do their duty to defend the constitution?

14th Amendment: Simplified Summary, Text & Impact | HISTORY

The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1868, granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States—including former slaves—and guaranteed all citizens “equal protection of the laws.”

www.history.com

I had high hopes for Barrett, but she's disappointed us several times so far.

 

[Care4all]

6-3 or 5-4 with Amy and Lolita Island Roberts joining the DEI progressives

Fyi

That John Roberts visiting Lolita, was the John Roberts of FOX NEWS, not the Chief Justice....

 

[mudwhistle]

I had high hopes for Barrett, but she's disappointed us several times so far.

She was recommended by the Turtle.....so it's clear why he did it.

 

[Zincwarrior]

As we speak arguments are before the Supreme Court that the 14th Amendment was only created to apply to children of slaves, not anyone else.

However, I think the court is going to ignore reality and rule to allow illegals to continue remaining legally in the US.....because they think it would be too difficult to enforce the law correctly.

On a side note, they're really arguing over district judges trying to block the Trump Adm from removing illegals.

This is a very important issue.....and how the judges rule will show us exactly what's going on inside the court.

Is the fix in, or are they going to do their duty to defend the constitution?

14th Amendment: Simplified Summary, Text & Impact | HISTORY

The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1868, granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States—including former slaves—and guaranteed all citizens “equal protection of the laws.”

www.history.com

They need to else all you fucktards are illegals. Not me though, you ungrateful illegals!

 

[mudwhistle]

They need to else all you fucktards are illegals. Not me though, you ungrateful illegals!

Bro.....are you high?

It's only Thursday night.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Bro.....are you high?

It's only Thursday night.

Are your relatives here before the state they were in became a state? If not uou are a fucking illegal alien
Get the hell out of my country!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

It doesn't need to be repealed. But we may have to just to eliminate the misuse of it.

There is no misuse except in your understanding.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I had high hopes for Barrett, but she's disappointed us several times so far.

She's become Amy Souter. Progressives NEVER stray because they know the Party won't allow it and sends them postcards from Fort Marcy Park to remind them what the penalty is for disobedience

 

[mudwhistle]

Are your relatives here before the state they were in became a state? If not uou are a fucking illegal alien
Get the hell out of my country!

Which state? The state I was born in wasn't a state when my family first got here.

My Dad's relatives have been here since the 1600s.
My Mom's came on a boat in the 1920s from Denmark.
Funny thing is....her side of the family is where most of the Native-American blood is in my family.
Her first husband was from the Lakota Tribe.
My uncle Frank was Blackfoot.

Then again, my wife was half Seminole.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Fyi

That John Roberts visiting Lolita, was the John Roberts of FOX NEWS, not the Chief Justice....

Yeah yeah yeah, so you say

 

[Rawley]

She's become Amy Souter. Progressives NEVER stray because they know the Party won't allow it and sends them postcards from Fort Marcy Park to remind them what the penalty is for disobedience

She helped give us Dobbs, so she still has a lot of credit in the bank

 

[Foxfyre]

I think that the 14th Amendment should be repealed.

No person born in the USA of an illegal should be granted citizenship, but that requires an Amendment process.

I am not now, and never will be, okay with a President just changing a Constitutional Amendment with an EO/EA.

I am 100% certain that original intent was never for somebody to be able to sneak into the United States and give birth so that compassionate Americans would allow her and all her kin to live here forever because her baby is here.

They were specific that those visiting, diplomats, those authorized to do business in the United States had no such rights for their children. So why should those invading our country be give such rights?

The legal interpretation could very well be that 'under the jurisdiction of' the United States mean citizens and permanent residents and that citizens of other countries would be 'under the jurisdiction' of whatever government in the country where they are citizens.

Mark Levin, one of constitutional scholars I've never caught in an error on that, argues the point here:

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/08/20/mark_levin_supreme_court_has_never_ruled_that_children_of_illegals_are_citizens.html