Wrong, shit for brains, Ford's claims are the ones that require proof. Being skeptical requires nothing. Those who insist she is credible need to produce some kind of evidence that she should be believed. So far, the have produced nothing.When I have ever wasted my time trying to prove a negative? Your moronic insistence they I do so only proves what a dumbass you are.My decisions aren't based on feelings. They are based on facts. I didn't feel Trump would be a better president than the corrupt criminal Hillary. I knew it based on the facts I know about each of them. I also know that Ford is lying.People make decisions on feelings all the time. You felt that Trump would be a better President then Clinton. You feel that Ford is lying. Maybe you even feel that God exist. Point is in a lot of decisions in life feeling is often the only thing to go by.
What you *SHOULD* know by now is that you can't prove that negative. You've been busted on it before.
Nevertheless, here you come again selling the same shit, oblivious to the fact that you'll just get called on it again. Then you'll lick your wounds wondering what happened because you never learn.
You haven't. That part sails over your pointed little head. You just plop out dipshit ass-sertions like the one you just plopped above, oblivious to the inconvenient fact that that carries the burden of proof, which you don't have. So when you say "I also know that Ford is lying" the only lying actually going on is in your own ass-sertion because you *DON'T* know that.
And yet you keep digging into the same hole.
***YOU*** just made the current claim, fuckface. ROLL TAPE.
I also know that Ford is lying.
WHAT the fuck is the verb in that sentence? "Know"
WHAT is the subject? "I".
YOU are claiming to KNOW something that you DO NOT and CAN NOT.
That's your own post.
Holy SHIT you're a dense motherfucker.