I never thought I would say this - but man I love this guy!

[PoliticalChic]

“Former Obama Aide Is Sorry for Saying Obama Hates People”

Not the least bit surprising when you consider his arrogance. If you believe that everyone around you is significantly intellectually inferior - you’re not going to have an ounce of respect for them. You will hate them. And MaObama has convinced himself that everyone is intellectually inferior to him.

Absolutely.....but how to blame him when the Liberals were slobbering all over him, proclaiming him Jesus, god, and the messiah.


Remember this?
"The White House takes pride in the fact that Obama’s PDB is “not briefed to him” – because, they say, he is “among the most sophisticated consumers of intelligence on the planet.” That hubris brings to mind this revealing quote from a September 2008 New York Times profile of Obama:

“I think that I’m a better speechwriter than my speechwriters,” Mr. Obama told Patrick Gaspard, his political director, at the start of the 2008 campaign, according to The New Yorker. “I know more about policies on any particular issue than my policy directors. And I’ll tell you right now that I’m going to think I’m a better political director than my political director.”

So it should come as no surprise that apparently Barack Obama thinks he’s a better intelligence briefer than his intelligence briefers."
Obama: I’m a better intelligence briefer than my intelligence briefers - AEI



Yet, an abject failure at domestic as well as foreign policy.

The only worse failures are his supporters.

 

[P@triot]

You should read a basic description of totalitarianism and fascism. This teaches us that right-wing totalitarianism enforces private ownership of industrial wealth.

You cannot have “right-wing totalitarianism”.

That is more absurd than saying “complete oppressive liberty”.

 

[P@triot]

"National Socialist" is a label.

And an accurate one! Adolf Hitler nationalized damn near everything (with a few exceptions of course). Stop buying into the left-wing propaganda and think for yourself.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

I was the ultimate conservative "never Trump".

So what you're telling us is that you mindlessly fixate on positions, but also abandon your principles when having your scrotum adequately stimulated.

 

[SmokeALib]

I was the ultimate conservative "never Trump". And I still keep waiting for the "shoe to drop". I keep expecting him to be like MaObama and shred the U.S. Constitution, consolidate ALL power to the Oval Office, and use the White House for his own personal agenda.

Instead, President Trump has been the quintessential constitutional president. He has rejected power to the Oval Office and restored it to the states where it belongs. He has cut taxes to allow people to keep the money they earned (which in turn has increased incomes, decreased unemployment, and allowed businesses to invest and expand). He has put the American people first - above party, politics, his personal agenda, and other nations. And, as a bonus, he's not afraid to tell it like it is.

Wrong, Warren was waiting tables at the age of 13 while he in a private school.

He brought the swamp to Washington including himself, I see Pruitt just resigned, but he only hires the best.

You like him because you are like him, a disgusting fool, but he likes the "poorly educated".

PS: trump inherited his start in life and swindled many out of money.

Government check?

 

[Nova78]

I was the ultimate conservative "never Trump". And I still keep waiting for the "shoe to drop". I keep expecting him to be like MaObama and shred the U.S. Constitution, consolidate ALL power to the Oval Office, and use the White House for his own personal agenda.

Instead, President Trump has been the quintessential constitutional president. He has rejected power to the Oval Office and restored it to the states where it belongs. He has cut taxes to allow people to keep the money they earned (which in turn has increased incomes, decreased unemployment, and allowed businesses to invest and expand). He has put the American people first - above party, politics, his personal agenda, and other nations. And, as a bonus, he's not afraid to tell it like it is.

Wrong, Warren was waiting tables at the age of 13 while he in a private school.

He brought the swamp to Washington including himself, I see Pruitt just resigned, but he only hires the best.

You like him because you are like him, a disgusting fool, but he likes the "poorly educated".

PS: trump inherited his start in life and swindled many out of money.

Go light a candle ,or go find a crying room

 

[dudmuck]

"National Socialist" is a label.

And an accurate one! Adolf Hitler nationalized damn near everything (with a few exceptions of course). Stop buying into the left-wing propaganda and think for yourself.

I dont look at left wing propaganda. I just look at historians..

In his 2010 book Hitler: A Biography, British historian Ian Kershaw wrote that despite putting the interests of the state above those of capitalism, he did so for reasons of nationalism and was never a true socialist by any common definition of the term.

Richard J. Evans: ‘It Would Be Wrong to See Nazism as a Form of, or an Outgrowth From, Socialism’

Also, Oswald Spengler, who was a great influence in nazi germany, pushed prussian socialism, which isnt anything like the socialism we know. Instead it was something which appealed to the revolutionary right; anti-marxist at the extreme.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"National Socialist" is a label.

And an accurate one! Adolf Hitler nationalized damn near everything (with a few exceptions of course). Stop buying into the left-wing propaganda and think for yourself.

I dont look at left wing propaganda. I just look at historians..

In his 2010 book Hitler: A Biography, British historian Ian Kershaw wrote that despite putting the interests of the state above those of capitalism, he did so for reasons of nationalism and was never a true socialist by any common definition of the term.

Richard J. Evans: ‘It Would Be Wrong to See Nazism as a Form of, or an Outgrowth From, Socialism’

Also, Oswald Spengler, who was a great influence in nazi germany, pushed prussian socialism, which isnt anything like the socialism we know. Instead it was something which appealed to the revolutionary right; anti-marxist at the extreme.

Like Mighty Mouse....here I come, to save the day!


"Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman


1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.



2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?


3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.


4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.




5. De facto government ownership of the means of production... was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State." Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman





a. "Socialists like Bernie Sanders rarely call for full-blown government ownership of the means of production. They call for policies that amount to government management of the means of production. Such policies calling for extensive federal intervention into local affairs stand in direct violation of the limits placed on federal power by the U.S. Constitution. Yet, when people express concern about the dangers of a centrally planned economy, Sanders tries to assuage such fears by saying, “The government, in a democratic society, is the people.”
Falling in Love With Socialism





6. The German embrace of collectivism goes back a long way:


a. "...the State 'has the supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the State... for the right of the world spirit is above all special privileges.'" Author/historian William Shirer, quoting Georg Hegel in his The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (1959, page 144)


b. "Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz" ("The community comes before the individual") concretizes the collectivist belief that individuals have no rights and that "the greater good" is the only standard of value. Under such a system, man is not an end to himself, only a tool to be sacrificed for the Führer, autocrat or ruling mob.

Only capitalism regards man as a sovereign individual with an inalienable right to his own life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. Government recognition and protection of individual rights is the hallmark of a moral, peaceful, productive society.
Sipsey Street Irregulars: The lie before the crime. "Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz" ("The community comes before the individual")


c. The Germans have a history of embracing authoritarian rule. As the German philosopher Hegel said, “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest” (Ralf Dahrendorf, Society and Democracy in Germany).


Want to guess as to the origins of Progrssivism in the United States?

 

[P@triot]

"National Socialist" is a label.

And an accurate one! Adolf Hitler nationalized damn near everything (with a few exceptions of course). Stop buying into the left-wing propaganda and think for yourself.

I dont look at left wing propaganda. I just look at historians..

Clearly you don’t as I handed you a Nobel Prize winner who confirmed that fascism is exclusively left-wing and you ignored it because you found it inconvenient to you’re narrative.

 

[dudmuck]

"National Socialist" is a label.

And an accurate one! Adolf Hitler nationalized damn near everything (with a few exceptions of course). Stop buying into the left-wing propaganda and think for yourself.

I dont look at left wing propaganda. I just look at historians..

In his 2010 book Hitler: A Biography, British historian Ian Kershaw wrote that despite putting the interests of the state above those of capitalism, he did so for reasons of nationalism and was never a true socialist by any common definition of the term.

Richard J. Evans: ‘It Would Be Wrong to See Nazism as a Form of, or an Outgrowth From, Socialism’

Also, Oswald Spengler, who was a great influence in nazi germany, pushed prussian socialism, which isnt anything like the socialism we know. Instead it was something which appealed to the revolutionary right; anti-marxist at the extreme.

Like Mighty Mouse....here I come, to save the day!


"Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman


1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.



2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?


3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.


4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.




5. De facto government ownership of the means of production... was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State." Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman





a. "Socialists like Bernie Sanders rarely call for full-blown government ownership of the means of production. They call for policies that amount to government management of the means of production. Such policies calling for extensive federal intervention into local affairs stand in direct violation of the limits placed on federal power by the U.S. Constitution. Yet, when people express concern about the dangers of a centrally planned economy, Sanders tries to assuage such fears by saying, “The government, in a democratic society, is the people.”
Falling in Love With Socialism





6. The German embrace of collectivism goes back a long way:


a. "...the State 'has the supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the State... for the right of the world spirit is above all special privileges.'" Author/historian William Shirer, quoting Georg Hegel in his The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (1959, page 144)


b. "Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz" ("The community comes before the individual") concretizes the collectivist belief that individuals have no rights and that "the greater good" is the only standard of value. Under such a system, man is not an end to himself, only a tool to be sacrificed for the Führer, autocrat or ruling mob.

Only capitalism regards man as a sovereign individual with an inalienable right to his own life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. Government recognition and protection of individual rights is the hallmark of a moral, peaceful, productive society.
Sipsey Street Irregulars: The lie before the crime. "Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz" ("The community comes before the individual")


c. The Germans have a history of embracing authoritarian rule. As the German philosopher Hegel said, “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest” (Ralf Dahrendorf, Society and Democracy in Germany).


Want to guess as to the origins of Progrssivism in the United States?

George Reisman: another Ayn Rand nutter.

Friedrich Hayek: your quote only relates to fascism vs communism.
See reference 14

Both of you need a fact check.
And schooling by a history writer.

 

[P@triot]

Friedrich Hayek: your quote only relates to fascism vs communism.

There is nothing more comical than watching nutters argue against reality.

Fascism is exclusively left-wing snowflake. Everybody knows it. Most accept it.

 

[P@triot]

Man I love this guy! Never thought I would say that in million years. I fully expected the third term of Barack Obama. Instead, he has been the most constitutional president of the modern era.

President Trump first proposed reorganizing the federal government less than two months after taking office. In an executive order signed on March 13, 2017, Trump directed OMB to “propose a plan to reorganize governmental functions and eliminate unnecessary agencies.”

The proposal is very positive...

• That plan was released last month and included several controversial proposals among its 32 “alignment priorities,”

• including combining the Department of Labor with the Department of Education

• moving the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, commonly known as food stamps, under the purview of the Department of Health and Human Services

• and, perhaps most controversially, turning over the financially-imperiled Postal Service to private management.

Realistically we should see complete elimination of the Department of Labor and the Department of Education as both are egregiously unconstitutional. But combining them to reduce redundancy and save tax payer dollars is a good first step.

Also, it makes a lot of sense to move SNAP under the Department of Health & Human Services (though another department that shouldn't even exist as it too is egregiously unconstitutional).

It is really something to see the left panic over the idea of not having a bloated, government monstrosity.

Democrats sound alarm over Trump’s plan to slash federal government