Fighting Nazis is an honorable thing that should be done for it's own sake. If you people embrace the Nazis simply because liberals rightly hate them you are ******* fools.
They have a right to speak, even if their message is deplorable. You can't pick and choose when it comes to the 1st amendment.
You don't get to use violence to suppress other's speech without consequences.
Why do you people not get this? They have first amendment rights same the people who oppose them, you are picking and choosing by thinking counter protestors should be segregated away from them so they can have their circle-jerk in peace. Not going to happen.
They SHOULD be able to have their hateful circle jerk in peace. Just like communists should be able to have their hateful circle jerk in peace. Just like BLM types should be allowed to yell "pigs in a blanket fry 'em like bacon" without being assaulted for it. Political speech should never be responded to with physical violence, because once you start justifying violence against certain ideas, it's only a small matter of time until someone in power decides to categorize all opposing ideas as worthy of a violent response. You can believe with all your misguided little heart that bashing the fash' is "honorable" regardless of context, but the methods you're advocating for are exactly what paves the way for tyrannical leaders to implement the very sort of mass murderous policies that you claim to be fighting against.
yep.
they don't seem to understand their desire to have abilities no one else can share isn't going to work, they just throw a childlike trantrum and demand to be able to do things they tell others not to do.
but things like:
1) no president in their final year can appoint a SCOTUS - biden
2) the nuclear option built by democrats
these 2 big ones have bit them in the ass and they whined like crazy saying NOT THE SAME NOT THE SAME for no other reason that they had to follow their own precedence set BY THEM.
My favorite thing about the modern left. This new pseudo-Marxism that seems to be the prevailing set of principles is built around rationalizing double standards, and it always essentially boils down to one of two maxims:
When I do it, it's okay because I do it for my reasons, which are the good reasons. When you do it, it's not okay, because you do it for not-my reasons, which are the bad reasons.
OR
When I do it, it's okay because I'm part of my in-group, which is the good people. When you do it, it's not okay because you're part of the out-group, which is the bad people.
It's like an eloquent 6 year old wrote an ideology, but somehow it's taken academia by storm. I weep for our culture.