wwwwhhhhhhhhhhhhhoooooooooooooosssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhl.............
Number one, "I" don't "have" anybody. "We" will have the usual choice of Bad or Worse but that's got nothing to do with me; That --- the monopoly of Duopoly -- may be a desperate situation but I didn't ******* put it there. I agree it's "too bad" so get up off your ass and do something about it instead of sitting here shilling for the Same Old Thing.
Number two, anyone who runs in the frenetic pace of a POTUS campaign cannot by any stretch be called "feeble";
and number three, you're talking about a freak who literally never had a job in his life until he was 70 years old, so where you're getting the term "work" out of that is more self-delusion.
Correct, because being a businessman requires no work.
View attachment 310896
Actually I said "never had a job".
I KNOW you remember what a "job" is. Virtually all of us do. Going out in your best appearance begging for a position that you may or may not get, and if you do get it knowing you then have to meet somebody else's expectations whether you feel like it or not, knowing that if you don't you can be replaced? That thing?
That's why I keep noting in astounded stupefication, what a great idea it was to take a sloth who had literally never accepted an iota of responsibility in his life, not a job, not military service, not a marriage or parenting, not even his own statements ---- and plunk him down into the most responsible job in the world. I can't think of any reason you wouldn't want to do that, can you? Doesn't that sound like just a brilliant idea?
Oh and as far as businessman requiring no work, lemme leave you with a quote:
"I didn't run the company, I only licensed my name" --- Guess Who
Poor baby. Licensing a name, that must have been EXHAUSTING.

But hey, it does evade responsibility, and that's the Prime Directive.
No, your implication was that because he never worked for anybody, he never worked.
and number three, you're talking about a freak who literally never had a job in his life until he was 70 years old, so where you're getting the term "work" out of that is more self-delusion.
People that run their own business likely worked harder than you or I ever did. If you had a brand name, would you just give it out to anybody? No. You'd have to check the entire company out first. You'd have to keep an eye on how the business with your name on it is doing. If it looks like trouble, you may even schedule meetings to see whats going on and perhaps offer some suggestions.
.
Oooooh, schedule meetings. That's very intensive.
Again, the quoted poster tried to compare "feeble old men" of the same age as Rump, with, quote, "a man who is able to o out work most 30 year olds".
Diga me, what does Rump actually DO? Aside from running his mouth about ME ME ME and waddling his fat ass out to the golf course? Thumb exercises on the Twit machine? I guarantee you anybody running for POTUS, including his Republican rivals the party doesn't want you to know about, including the "feeble old men" (I guess the woman doesn't count), is doing
WAAAAAAAAY more work than that in terms of unreally long days, relentless travel, never a break, etc. Rump can't even pry himself away from the television to go to a WWI memorial because it's raining and his hair might get wet, while the 92 year old Queen of England does. Can't even handle the White House Correspondents Dinner, and that's a place where you get FED.
Rump's tenure as POTUS is an extension of the rest of his 70-pus years ---- being able to not lift a finger while people around him hand him everything. I know that says "70-pus" above, it was a mistype but then I thought, no that actually fits.