Yep and proud of it, Pinky.That all you got blacky?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep and proud of it, Pinky.That all you got blacky?
And you're the picture of non racism huh LOL tell us another jokeGet a new line, why would vote like a racist POS like you does?
I'm not surprised. Your chimp brain is incapable of serious thought. Stick to stealing bicycles TyroneYep and proud of it, Pinky.
Then why are you saying it? Every time a Democrat prefaces a statement in this manner, you know he/she/it is being disingenuous.I really hate to say this
So they aren't allowed to listen to Trump?Those MAGArats at the Capitol were hanging on every word Trump tweeted
Thxs for revealing yourself as the racist POS you are.I'm not surprised. Your chimp brain is incapable of serious thought. Stick to stealing bicycles Tyrone
View attachment 673702
Cry moreThxs for revealing yourself as the racist POS you are.
Protest, even violent protest, is essential to the resolution of political disagreements in a republic.
Being wrong does not make violent protest illegal.
It is Congress who handled this wrong, not the protestors or the president.
Naive is your monkey ass saying none of those dems called for violent protests while slamming Trump. Self Awareness much jiggaboo?
which is what makes the American left illegitimate, were it not for violent protest [ as well as violence in general] it would not exist today...Umm, I think there is an argument to be made that being violent is what makes a protest illegal.
...yeah, the white leftists incite and then see the minions as just that...you say "violent jackasses" others say "useful idiots", either way this could be ended if both sides stopped the left wing incited hatefulness of the liberal elitists and turned on them.Or at least, it makes the violent jackasses within the protest illegal.
no one knows this/that better than the chicago 7 crowdAnd being wrong....just compounds it. Makes it a harder sell to the jury. No?
both sides stopped the left wing incited hatefulness of the liberal elitists
Non sequitur...but quite understandable, I am however disappointed that your avatar didn't see fit to step in clean up the post.Ummm, was it the "left wing" inciters who beat the crap out of the cops on the steps of the Capitol of the United States of America? Gave Officer Sicknick a double dose-to-the-face of bear-spray?
I don't think so.
I think it was the MAGA-Q Nation that brought re-bar, bats, guns, and crow-bars to that shameful attack on America by Americans.
IMHO
You are not telling the truth. I saw the video where he called on them not to do anything. LolI really hate to say this, and I fully acknowledge that Schumer and Pelosi committed their share of wrongdoing in the matter, but the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the January 6 riot to continue by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to stand down after the riot began.
This is a two-edged sword that cuts at both sides. Chuck Schumer sat on vital intel about plans to storm the Capitol, and Nancy Pelosi twice turned down requests to use National Guard troops to guard the Capitol on January 6, even though Trump had approved their use. However, the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the riot to continue, that he purposely delayed telling his supporters to stand down after the riot began.
Trump clearly acted as an accessory to the riot after it began. He never called for violence before it occurred; in fact, he urged his supporters to protest peacefully, and he authorized 20,000 NG troops to guard the Capitol. But once the riot began, he acted as an accessory to a felony by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to cease and desist. This was a serious criminal action, and the GOP should repudiate Trump and expel him from the party over it.
At the other end, Schumer's failure to act on the FBI intel, or even to ensure that the capitol police received the intel, is inexcusable and suggests that he wanted the riot to occur so he could use it for propaganda purposes against the Republicans. The Democrats should force Schumer to resign over his failure to act on the FBI intel.
Similarly, Nancy Pelosi's inexplicable failure to allow NG troops to help guard the Capitol on January 6 suggests that she, too, wanted the riot to occur so it could be used for propaganda purposes. The claim that she refused to use the troops because this would have been "bad optics" is lame, given that she had no problem forcing the troops to guard the Capitol for five months after the riot, long after there was any credible need for them to be there. Pelosi should be forced to resign because of her refusal to allow NG troops to guard the Capitol on January 6.
From John Solomon's second blockbuster article based on newly obtained documents:
FBI intelligence warning that Jan. 6 protesters might violently storm the Capitol, target lawmakers and blockade Democrats in tunnels was never sent to frontline police commanders and officers, but was quietly emailed the night before to a top aide to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, according to documents that raise new concern that politics trumped security preparedness in the fateful hours before the riot.
Capitol Police Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher emailed top Schumer aide Kelly Fado, now the Senate's deputy sergeant of arms, at about 9:40 p.m. on Jan. 5, 2021 saying he wanted to "provide you visibility" to new intelligence that an FBI threat analysis center had received from a website owner, according to documents obtained by Just the News.
The information explicitly warned that demonstrators had detailed maps of the tunnel systems around the Capitol frequented by lawmakers and their staffs and they were plotting to create a "perimeter" for potential violence and to find "Democratic members early to block them from entering the Capitol." One point of entry the rioters were targeting was the Library of Congress, he warned.(Jan. 6 Bombshell: Schumer team received FBI intel about possible violence, frontline cops didn't)
LOLIn other words "You didnt cause this riot, but since you didnt tell them to stop, the riot is now YOUR fault, Trump". Ok, so how was Trump supposed to tell rioters to stop rioting? People who are busy chucking rocks at the police arent checking their twitter feed, so how the fuck was he supposed to tell them anything?
Also, which democrat is at fault for the BLM riots because they didnt tell BLM to stop rioting, or does your standard only apply to the right??
/——-/ Shortly after posting these tweets, President Trump’s account was shut down.I really hate to say this, and I fully acknowledge that Schumer and Pelosi committed their share of wrongdoing in the matter, but the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the January 6 riot to continue by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to stand down after the riot began.
This is a two-edged sword that cuts at both sides. Chuck Schumer sat on vital intel about plans to storm the Capitol, and Nancy Pelosi twice turned down requests to use National Guard troops to guard the Capitol on January 6, even though Trump had approved their use. However, the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the riot to continue, that he purposely delayed telling his supporters to stand down after the riot began.
Trump clearly acted as an accessory to the riot after it began. He never called for violence before it occurred; in fact, he urged his supporters to protest peacefully, and he authorized 20,000 NG troops to guard the Capitol. But once the riot began, he acted as an accessory to a felony by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to cease and desist. This was a serious criminal action, and the GOP should repudiate Trump and expel him from the party over it.
At the other end, Schumer's failure to act on the FBI intel, or even to ensure that the capitol police received the intel, is inexcusable and suggests that he wanted the riot to occur so he could use it for propaganda purposes against the Republicans. The Democrats should force Schumer to resign over his failure to act on the FBI intel.
Similarly, Nancy Pelosi's inexplicable failure to allow NG troops to help guard the Capitol on January 6 suggests that she, too, wanted the riot to occur so it could be used for propaganda purposes. The claim that she refused to use the troops because this would have been "bad optics" is lame, given that she had no problem forcing the troops to guard the Capitol for five months after the riot, long after there was any credible need for them to be there. Pelosi should be forced to resign because of her refusal to allow NG troops to guard the Capitol on January 6.
From John Solomon's second blockbuster article based on newly obtained documents:
FBI intelligence warning that Jan. 6 protesters might violently storm the Capitol, target lawmakers and blockade Democrats in tunnels was never sent to frontline police commanders and officers, but was quietly emailed the night before to a top aide to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, according to documents that raise new concern that politics trumped security preparedness in the fateful hours before the riot.
Capitol Police Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher emailed top Schumer aide Kelly Fado, now the Senate's deputy sergeant of arms, at about 9:40 p.m. on Jan. 5, 2021 saying he wanted to "provide you visibility" to new intelligence that an FBI threat analysis center had received from a website owner, according to documents obtained by Just the News.
The information explicitly warned that demonstrators had detailed maps of the tunnel systems around the Capitol frequented by lawmakers and their staffs and they were plotting to create a "perimeter" for potential violence and to find "Democratic members early to block them from entering the Capitol." One point of entry the rioters were targeting was the Library of Congress, he warned.(Jan. 6 Bombshell: Schumer team received FBI intel about possible violence, frontline cops didn't)
Why don’t those Tweets have times?/——-/ Shortly after posting these tweets, President Trump’s account was shut down.
View attachment 730009