I Hate to Say It, But the January 6 Committee Has Proved that Trump Committed a Serious Crime on January 6, 2021

/——-/ Shortly after posting these tweets, President Trump’s account was shut down.
View attachment 730009

Actually, this was the tweet which got him banned for putting the vice president's life in jeopardy...

6e8ee6d7-0739-4519-a014-6b9344185b38-large16x9_GJIURIHPXVAMTLHOLZLZW5UKRA.jpeg
 
Actually, this was the tweet which got him banned for putting the vice president's life in jeopardy...

6e8ee6d7-0739-4519-a014-6b9344185b38-large16x9_GJIURIHPXVAMTLHOLZLZW5UKRA.jpeg
/——-/ Nothing in that tweet threatens the VPs life except you wild eyed delusional TDS. democrats said far worse about Trump.
BTW, Trump was right. All Pence had to do was to send the results back to the state legislatures for them to review. Nothing complicated about that.
 
/——-/ Nothing in that tweet threatens the VPs life except you wild eyed delusional TDS. democrats said far worse about Trump.
BTW, Trump was right. All Pence had to do was to send the results back to the state legislatures for them to review. Nothing complicated about that.

LOLOL

Yeah, dumbfuck, it was that "nothing" that led Trump's mob of violent domestic terrorists to start chanting, "hang Mike Pence!"

And nothing in the Constitution authorizes the president of the Senate to unilaterally reject electors and send them back to the states. Trump's own attorney warned him that was illegal.
 
LOLOL

Yeah, dumbfuck, it was that "nothing" that led Trump's mob of violent domestic terrorists to start chanting, "hang Mike Pence!"
Were any FBI agents or paid informers part of the group that started the chant? Were any of the FBI paid informants part of other escalation inflection points?

Congressmen and Senators asked the FBI those questions and they refused to answer. I thought you might know?
And nothing in the Constitution authorizes the president of the Senate to unilaterally reject electors and send them back to the states. Trump's own attorney warned him that was illegal.
But the Constitution allows the president or anyone else to say that that should happen. Just like nothing in the Constitution authorizes Congress to make laws infringing on the right to keep and bear arms, but it's fine for people to say that they should.
 
I really hate to say this, and I fully acknowledge that Schumer and Pelosi committed their share of wrongdoing in the matter,
🛑 STOP: Right there you just stated that the whole J6 process is invalidated! If the very people running the investigation committed wrong doing, just how do you expect to get a valid outcome from an INVALID procedure! In any court of law, just not reading the suspect his rights, it does not matter the guilt or innocence of the suspect, the PROCESS IS THROWN OUT INVALID. SHAME ON YOU.


but the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the January 6 riot to continue by refusing to immediately call on his supporter
🛑 STOP. That's it? He "allowed it to continue?" How is that a crime of anything? Are you freeking kidding me? Trump is guilty because he waited too long to try to stop a riot that he had no way of knowing would go that far, get that much out of hand, or that his call would even work, be seen and heeded, or that he had no hand in even causing?

Mike you sure are full of one big load of BULL SHIT.

Let's say the same thing of Joe Biden who despite a record 80,000 deaths a year due to fentanyl drug smuggled in the southern border from China, Joe Biden has purposely allowed the massive drug war on this country to continue.

Trump failed to try making a phone call earlier, maybe hoping it would work and he'd get his chance to have the 2020 election actually seriously looked into and reexamined...

Biden has failed to act for TWO YEARS allowing more adults to die of fentanyl than COVID-19, motor vehicle accidents, cancer and suicide COMBINED.

Yeah, how about THAT, Ace.

 
🛑 STOP: Right there you just stated that the whole J6 process is invalidated! If the very people running the investigation committed wrong doing, just how do you expect to get a valid outcome from an INVALID procedure! In any court of law, just not reading the suspect his rights, it does not matter the guilt or innocence of the suspect, the PROCESS IS THROWN OUT INVALID. SHAME ON YOU.



🛑 STOP. That's it? He "allowed it to continue?" How is that a crime of anything? Are you freeking kidding me? Trump is guilty because he waited too long to try to stop a riot that he had no way of knowing would go that far, get that much out of hand, or that his call would even work, be seen and heeded, or that he had no hand in even causing?

Mike you sure are full of one big load of BULL SHIT.

Let's say the same thing of Joe Biden who despite a record 80,000 deaths a year due to fentanyl drug smuggled in the southern border from China, Joe Biden has purposely allowed the massive drug war on this country to continue.

Trump failed to try making a phone call earlier, maybe hoping it would work and he'd get his chance to have the 2020 election actually seriously looked into and reexamined...

Biden has failed to act for TWO YEARS allowing more adults to die of fentanyl than COVID-19, motor vehicle accidents, cancer and suicide COMBINED.

Yeah, how about THAT, Ace.

He's just a media fed parrot who cannot think for himself.
 
In other words "You didnt cause this riot, but since you didnt tell them to stop, the riot is now YOUR fault, Trump". Ok, so how was Trump supposed to tell rioters to stop rioting? People who are busy chucking rocks at the police arent checking their twitter feed, so how the fuck was he supposed to tell them anything?

Also, which democrat is at fault for the BLM riots because they didnt tell BLM to stop rioting, or does your standard only apply to the right??

Trump incited his followers for six weeks to come to DC and fight and take back their country.
 
I really hate to say this, and I fully acknowledge that Schumer and Pelosi committed their share of wrongdoing in the matter, but the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the January 6 riot to continue by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to stand down after the riot began.

This is a two-edged sword that cuts at both sides. Chuck Schumer sat on vital intel about plans to storm the Capitol, and Nancy Pelosi twice turned down requests to use National Guard troops to guard the Capitol on January 6, even though Trump had approved their use. However, the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the riot to continue, that he purposely delayed telling his supporters to stand down after the riot began.

Trump clearly acted as an accessory to the riot after it began. He never called for violence before it occurred; in fact, he urged his supporters to protest peacefully, and he authorized 20,000 NG troops to guard the Capitol. But once the riot began, he acted as an accessory to a felony by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to cease and desist. This was a serious criminal action, and the GOP should repudiate Trump and expel him from the party over it.

At the other end, Schumer's failure to act on the FBI intel, or even to ensure that the capitol police received the intel, is inexcusable and suggests that he wanted the riot to occur so he could use it for propaganda purposes against the Republicans. The Democrats should force Schumer to resign over his failure to act on the FBI intel.

Similarly, Nancy Pelosi's inexplicable failure to allow NG troops to help guard the Capitol on January 6 suggests that she, too, wanted the riot to occur so it could be used for propaganda purposes. The claim that she refused to use the troops because this would have been "bad optics" is lame, given that she had no problem forcing the troops to guard the Capitol for five months after the riot, long after there was any credible need for them to be there. Pelosi should be forced to resign because of her refusal to allow NG troops to guard the Capitol on January 6.

From John Solomon's second blockbuster article based on newly obtained documents:

FBI intelligence warning that Jan. 6 protesters might violently storm the Capitol, target lawmakers and blockade Democrats in tunnels was never sent to frontline police commanders and officers, but was quietly emailed the night before to a top aide to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, according to documents that raise new concern that politics trumped security preparedness in the fateful hours before the riot.

Capitol Police Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher emailed top Schumer aide Kelly Fado, now the Senate's deputy sergeant of arms, at about 9:40 p.m. on Jan. 5, 2021 saying he wanted to "provide you visibility" to new intelligence that an FBI threat analysis center had received from a website owner, according to documents obtained by Just the News.

The information explicitly warned that demonstrators had detailed maps of the tunnel systems around the Capitol frequented by lawmakers and their staffs and they were plotting to create a "perimeter" for potential violence and to find "Democratic members early to block them from entering the Capitol." One point of entry the rioters were targeting was the Library of Congress, he warned.(Jan. 6 Bombshell: Schumer team received FBI intel about possible violence, frontline cops didn't)
Do you honestly think that the protesters were at Trump's beck-and-call? Do you imagine that they are were in touch with Trump through some sort of military-style command center?

If you do, you're nuts.
 

Forum List

Back
Top