Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Superior technology, superior tactics, superior industrial capacity, command of the air and seas, veteran troops in place, German officers could have been used to fill in most of the intel blanks, red army seriously depleted after taking Berlin...Might well have taken Moscow before Hiroshima.or and
Operation Pike - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Operation_Pike
Operation Pike was the code-name for a strategic bombing plan, overseen by Air Commodore John Slessor, against the Soviet Union by the Anglo-French alliance. British military planning against the Soviet Union occurred during the first two years of the Second World War, when, despite Soviet neutrality, ... Serious preparation by the British began after the end of the
I can't even imagine the depth of your love for Uncle Joe, it's fucking frighteningThe US lost 400,000 in WWIIUSA produced more than 50% world GDP in 1945 and 95% of high tech products
by the way the west had the plan actually
Operation Unthinkable - Wikipedia
By 1945, the public was sick of war and wanted it to end
Proposing an invasion of the USSR would have led to riots, not only at home, but within the ranks
There was no Pearl Harbor to rally the country for an extended war. A war that would have led to massive US casualties
US atomic bomb atop German V-2 = Stalin goes home
The US did not have an atomic bomb in May 1945 when Patton was shooting his mouth off.
So what if we nuked the hell out of a former ally and killed millions of people for no reason other than they were commies?
Where does that leave the US on the global stage? We would be hated
Are you deluded enough to believe that the US could justify killing millions of people just because they were led by Stalin?
Jimmy Carter ran a balanced budgetGive me a scenario where that could possibly happen
1. scenario one: accidental missile launch leading to full exchange. End of everything.
2. scenario two: jimmy carter wins re-election leading to weaker nato, leading to soviet union surviving and winning.
Trump has given us a weaker NATO with the US no longer in the lead
You made a serious request about how the Cold War could have gone. I gave you a serious and honest answer.
You ignored it, and made a comment about a post cold war situation, which is utterly irrelevant to the topic of this thread.
Why are you like this?
Just mocking your claims that Jimmy Carter led to a weaker NATO
Would Jimmy Carter had support Solidarity? Would Jimmy Carter had sent Stinger missiles to the Mujaheen? Would Jimmy Carter have deployed cruise missiles?
I can't even imagine the depth of your love for Uncle Joe, it's fucking frighteningThe US lost 400,000 in WWII
By 1945, the public was sick of war and wanted it to end
Proposing an invasion of the USSR would have led to riots, not only at home, but within the ranks
There was no Pearl Harbor to rally the country for an extended war. A war that would have led to massive US casualties
US atomic bomb atop German V-2 = Stalin goes home
The US did not have an atomic bomb in May 1945 when Patton was shooting his mouth off.
So what if we nuked the hell out of a former ally and killed millions of people for no reason other than they were commies?
Where does that leave the US on the global stage? We would be hated
Are you deluded enough to believe that the US could justify killing millions of people just because they were led by Stalin?
You must be a Communist troll, you do nothing but side with Uncle Joe
Jimmy Carter ran a balanced budget1. scenario one: accidental missile launch leading to full exchange. End of everything.
2. scenario two: jimmy carter wins re-election leading to weaker nato, leading to soviet union surviving and winning.
Trump has given us a weaker NATO with the US no longer in the lead
You made a serious request about how the Cold War could have gone. I gave you a serious and honest answer.
You ignored it, and made a comment about a post cold war situation, which is utterly irrelevant to the topic of this thread.
Why are you like this?
Just mocking your claims that Jimmy Carter led to a weaker NATO
Would Jimmy Carter had support Solidarity? Would Jimmy Carter had sent Stinger missiles to the Mujaheen? Would Jimmy Carter have deployed cruise missiles?
He also cut down post Vietnam forces as he would be expected to do
Carter actually volunteered to serve his country and didn’t claim to have bone spurs
Patton was a political moron.Jimmy Carter ran a balanced budgetTrump has given us a weaker NATO with the US no longer in the lead
You made a serious request about how the Cold War could have gone. I gave you a serious and honest answer.
You ignored it, and made a comment about a post cold war situation, which is utterly irrelevant to the topic of this thread.
Why are you like this?
Just mocking your claims that Jimmy Carter led to a weaker NATO
Would Jimmy Carter had support Solidarity? Would Jimmy Carter had sent Stinger missiles to the Mujaheen? Would Jimmy Carter have deployed cruise missiles?
He also cut down post Vietnam forces as he would be expected to do
Carter actually volunteered to serve his country and didn’t claim to have bone spurs
Your repeated refusals to serious and honestly respond to my points, shows that you understand that they are valid.
And thus, my original point, ie that the Cold War could have gone much worse than it did, is true.
AND, thus, that Patton had a point. THe Soviet Union was in many ways, a more serious threat than Nazi Germany.
+Superior technology, superior tactics, superior industrial capacity, command of the air and seas, veteran troops in place, German officers could have been used to fill in most of the intel blanks, red army seriously depleted after taking Berlin...Might well have taken Moscow before Hiroshima.or and
Operation Pike - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Operation_Pike
Operation Pike was the code-name for a strategic bombing plan, overseen by Air Commodore John Slessor, against the Soviet Union by the Anglo-French alliance. British military planning against the Soviet Union occurred during the first two years of the Second World War, when, despite Soviet neutrality, ... Serious preparation by the British began after the end of the
The only person who slaughtered tens of million of innocent Russians was your Hero Uncle Joe.I can't even imagine the depth of your love for Uncle Joe, it's fucking frighteningUS atomic bomb atop German V-2 = Stalin goes home
The US did not have an atomic bomb in May 1945 when Patton was shooting his mouth off.
So what if we nuked the hell out of a former ally and killed millions of people for no reason other than they were commies?
Where does that leave the US on the global stage? We would be hated
Are you deluded enough to believe that the US could justify killing millions of people just because they were led by Stalin?
You must be a Communist troll, you do nothing but side with Uncle Joe
When the question becomes, should we slaughter millions of innocent Russians just because they live in a communist country?
Doesn’t answer the questionThe only person who slaughtered tens of million of innocent Russians was your Hero Uncle Joe.I can't even imagine the depth of your love for Uncle Joe, it's fucking frighteningThe US did not have an atomic bomb in May 1945 when Patton was shooting his mouth off.
So what if we nuked the hell out of a former ally and killed millions of people for no reason other than they were commies?
Where does that leave the US on the global stage? We would be hated
Are you deluded enough to believe that the US could justify killing millions of people just because they were led by Stalin?
You must be a Communist troll, you do nothing but side with Uncle Joe
When the question becomes, should we slaughter millions of innocent Russians just because they live in a communist country?
Doesn’t answer the questionThe only person who slaughtered tens of million of innocent Russians was your Hero Uncle Joe.I can't even imagine the depth of your love for Uncle Joe, it's fucking frightening
Are you deluded enough to believe that the US could justify killing millions of people just because they were led by Stalin?
You must be a Communist troll, you do nothing but side with Uncle Joe
When the question becomes, should we slaughter millions of innocent Russians just because they live in a communist country?
How do you justify killing millions of civilians just because they are communist?
in 1945 koba did not have recurses och technologies to fight USA/UK . so it´d straight forward koba´s capitulation . do you need a link ?Doesn’t answer the questionThe only person who slaughtered tens of million of innocent Russians was your Hero Uncle Joe.I can't even imagine the depth of your love for Uncle Joe, it's fucking frightening
Are you deluded enough to believe that the US could justify killing millions of people just because they were led by Stalin?
You must be a Communist troll, you do nothing but side with Uncle Joe
When the question becomes, should we slaughter millions of innocent Russians just because they live in a communist country?
How do you justify killing millions of civilians just because they are communist?
No idea what the fuk you are sayingin 1945 koba did not have recurses och technologies to fight USA/UK . so it´d straight forward koba´s capitulation . do you need a link ?Doesn’t answer the questionThe only person who slaughtered tens of million of innocent Russians was your Hero Uncle Joe.Are you deluded enough to believe that the US could justify killing millions of people just because they were led by Stalin?
You must be a Communist troll, you do nothing but side with Uncle Joe
When the question becomes, should we slaughter millions of innocent Russians just because they live in a communist country?
How do you justify killing millions of civilians just because they are communist?
Joseph Stalin - WikipediaNo idea what the fuk you are sayingin 1945 koba did not have recurses och technologies to fight USA/UK . so it´d straight forward koba´s capitulation . do you need a link ?Doesn’t answer the questionThe only person who slaughtered tens of million of innocent Russians was your Hero Uncle Joe.You must be a Communist troll, you do nothing but side with Uncle Joe
When the question becomes, should we slaughter millions of innocent Russians just because they live in a communist country?
How do you justify killing millions of civilians just because they are communist?
Patton was a political moron.Jimmy Carter ran a balanced budgetYou made a serious request about how the Cold War could have gone. I gave you a serious and honest answer.
You ignored it, and made a comment about a post cold war situation, which is utterly irrelevant to the topic of this thread.
Why are you like this?
Just mocking your claims that Jimmy Carter led to a weaker NATO
Would Jimmy Carter had support Solidarity? Would Jimmy Carter had sent Stinger missiles to the Mujaheen? Would Jimmy Carter have deployed cruise missiles?
He also cut down post Vietnam forces as he would be expected to do
Carter actually volunteered to serve his country and didn’t claim to have bone spurs
Your repeated refusals to serious and honestly respond to my points, shows that you understand that they are valid.
And thus, my original point, ie that the Cold War could have gone much worse than it did, is true.
AND, thus, that Patton had a point. THe Soviet Union was in many ways, a more serious threat than Nazi Germany.
One reason it took him so long to get promoted
He was a tactical genius but had no concept of political realities
Committing US forces to fight the Soviets after 400,000 deaths for no reason is the rant of an idiot
I know who Stalin wasJoseph Stalin - WikipediaNo idea what the fuk you are sayingin 1945 koba did not have recurses och technologies to fight USA/UK . so it´d straight forward koba´s capitulation . do you need a link ?Doesn’t answer the questionThe only person who slaughtered tens of million of innocent Russians was your Hero Uncle Joe.When the question becomes, should we slaughter millions of innocent Russians just because they live in a communist country?
How do you justify killing millions of civilians just because they are communist?
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Joseph_Stalin
Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin was a Georgian revolutionary and Soviet politician who led the .... Another influential text was Alexander Kazbegi's The Patricide, with Stalin adopting the nickname "Koba" from that of the book's bandit protagonist.
Patton was a political moron.Jimmy Carter ran a balanced budgetJust mocking your claims that Jimmy Carter led to a weaker NATO
Would Jimmy Carter had support Solidarity? Would Jimmy Carter had sent Stinger missiles to the Mujaheen? Would Jimmy Carter have deployed cruise missiles?
He also cut down post Vietnam forces as he would be expected to do
Carter actually volunteered to serve his country and didn’t claim to have bone spurs
Your repeated refusals to serious and honestly respond to my points, shows that you understand that they are valid.
And thus, my original point, ie that the Cold War could have gone much worse than it did, is true.
AND, thus, that Patton had a point. THe Soviet Union was in many ways, a more serious threat than Nazi Germany.
One reason it took him so long to get promoted
He was a tactical genius but had no concept of political realities
Committing US forces to fight the Soviets after 400,000 deaths for no reason is the rant of an idiot
All correct. Yet, his point about the Soviet Union was also completely right. THey were in many ways, more of a grave threat than Nazi Germany was.
Your inability to even discuss this honestly, is very odd.
Patton was a political moron.Jimmy Carter ran a balanced budgetWould Jimmy Carter had support Solidarity? Would Jimmy Carter had sent Stinger missiles to the Mujaheen? Would Jimmy Carter have deployed cruise missiles?
He also cut down post Vietnam forces as he would be expected to do
Carter actually volunteered to serve his country and didn’t claim to have bone spurs
Your repeated refusals to serious and honestly respond to my points, shows that you understand that they are valid.
And thus, my original point, ie that the Cold War could have gone much worse than it did, is true.
AND, thus, that Patton had a point. THe Soviet Union was in many ways, a more serious threat than Nazi Germany.
One reason it took him so long to get promoted
He was a tactical genius but had no concept of political realities
Committing US forces to fight the Soviets after 400,000 deaths for no reason is the rant of an idiot
All correct. Yet, his point about the Soviet Union was also completely right. THey were in many ways, more of a grave threat than Nazi Germany was.
Your inability to even discuss this honestly, is very odd.
Turns out, we did not attack the Soviets
History proved the decision to be correct
Patton was a political moron.Jimmy Carter ran a balanced budget
He also cut down post Vietnam forces as he would be expected to do
Carter actually volunteered to serve his country and didn’t claim to have bone spurs
Your repeated refusals to serious and honestly respond to my points, shows that you understand that they are valid.
And thus, my original point, ie that the Cold War could have gone much worse than it did, is true.
AND, thus, that Patton had a point. THe Soviet Union was in many ways, a more serious threat than Nazi Germany.
One reason it took him so long to get promoted
He was a tactical genius but had no concept of political realities
Committing US forces to fight the Soviets after 400,000 deaths for no reason is the rant of an idiot
All correct. Yet, his point about the Soviet Union was also completely right. THey were in many ways, more of a grave threat than Nazi Germany was.
Your inability to even discuss this honestly, is very odd.
Turns out, we did not attack the Soviets
History proved the decision to be correct
We fought a conflict one way and managed to win. That does not address whether Patton was right on the scale of the threat or whether another way would have been superior.
Why is this so important to you to avoid? Do you even know?
Patton was a political moron.Your repeated refusals to serious and honestly respond to my points, shows that you understand that they are valid.
And thus, my original point, ie that the Cold War could have gone much worse than it did, is true.
AND, thus, that Patton had a point. THe Soviet Union was in many ways, a more serious threat than Nazi Germany.
One reason it took him so long to get promoted
He was a tactical genius but had no concept of political realities
Committing US forces to fight the Soviets after 400,000 deaths for no reason is the rant of an idiot
All correct. Yet, his point about the Soviet Union was also completely right. THey were in many ways, more of a grave threat than Nazi Germany was.
Your inability to even discuss this honestly, is very odd.
Turns out, we did not attack the Soviets
History proved the decision to be correct
We fought a conflict one way and managed to win. That does not address whether Patton was right on the scale of the threat or whether another way would have been superior.
Why is this so important to you to avoid? Do you even know?
The threat was contained through a Cold War up till the Soviet Union collapsed. Nobody killed
