So that's the line you are drawing? Everything else you do is ok?Find just one then, where I condemn you to Hell for being Catholic. I have as much right to repudiate dogma as you do promoting it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So that's the line you are drawing? Everything else you do is ok?Find just one then, where I condemn you to Hell for being Catholic. I have as much right to repudiate dogma as you do promoting it.
If you read all or even most of my posts, you would understand. But you don't even WANT to understand true Catholicism versus falseThen if you are Catholic, why attack your sect in another thread? I am laughing as an Evangelical.
What's next? "I am prepared to call Evangelicalism a cult"If you read all or even most of my posts, you would understand. But you don't even WANT to understand true Catholicism versus false
I am laughing as a Catholic..
Bullshit. Your point was to accuse me of something I didn't do, and used a thread that I didn't even post in to try to prove it.I couldn't either. That was my point. You didn't make that comment there. You were good with that thread.
At least I know what evangelicals teach. Most Protestants don't have a clue what Catholicism is.. but act like they know it inside and out. How dishonest can u get?What's next? "I am prepared to call Evangelicalism a cult"
You are an embarrassment to Catholicism. I have to keep reminding myself that you converted. You are a Protestant apostate and you behave like one.I am laughing as a Catholic..
I see no difference between you and the OP. None at all. You know what you do.Bullshit. Your point was to accuse me of something I didn't do, and used a thread that I didn't even post in to try to prove it.
And now you have determined that any post that I don't post in means I obviously approve of the thread.
Truth is, I don't post much at all.
lol. Check the stats to your left to determine who has their nose in every thread.
Amen. If he was truly Catholic, he wouldn't call Catholicism a cult.You are an embarrassment to Catholicism. I have to keep reminding myself that you converted. You are a Protestant apostate and you behave like one.
Or insult the faith of anyone else.Amen. If he was truly Catholic, he wouldn't call Catholicism a cult.
I have a feeling that he thinks Evangelicals like me are part of a cult.Or insult the faith of anyone else.
The problem with that word is that it's meaning has changed over time such that people associate it with Jim Jones type cults. Technically all religions are cults based upon the classical definition of cult.Amen. If he was truly Catholic, he wouldn't call Catholicism a cult.
He sees and treats people like he sees them. It's a pretty common human tendency.I have a feeling that he thinks Evangelicals like me are part of a cult.
You should probably understand what it is you don't like about someone b4 spouting off maliceI see no difference between you and the OP. None at all. You know what you do.
You are not Catholic. Catholics believe in JESUS who taught us many things about charity and TRUTH. You can't stand the truth, from my best info.. you and all the Ignored ones probably didn't even watch that video. You don't care about truth. And with that, you're back on Ignore.He sees and treats people like he sees them. It's a pretty common human tendency.
Point 4.25 is probably one of the most interesting parts of the video but it's all pretty interesting (unless you believe in osas, in which case you'll likely get massively ticked off.. )
Galatians 5:19
"Those who do such things will not inherit eternal life"
or is that the one that says If you want to get to Heaven, keep the commandments.
Well, both are in the Bible.. Remember, that's the book Protestants are supposed to believe in..
There no line. What the hell is wrong with you? Are you just insisting on a fight?So that's the line you are drawing? Everything else you do is ok?
There are several differences. I condemn no one to hell, and I back every statement with scripture. If I read something here that is contrary to what scripture says, I post the scripture.I see no difference between you and the OP. None at all. You know what you do.
Who said Peter "started" the Church in Rome? Certainly there is the tradition he visited the church (Christian congregation) in Rome, but not that he was the one who hands on "started" it. To Peter Christ gave the keys of the church. In Biblical times when the head/ruler of a nation or estate went away, the keys/authority were handed to a servant to take charge, be the head authority until the return of the master. That was Peter's role, given to him by Christ. The first Church/Congregation was in Jerusalem and spread out from there.On the other hand, keep telling me that Peter started the first church in Rome, and I will continue to post the scripture that says otherwise.
All of them repented and never went back to their sin.Those who do such things will inherit eternal life, if they repent. Here's a few:
Samson
Solomon
David
Mathew Mark Luke and John
Abraham
Adam
Paul
Peter
a
All of them repented and never went back to their sin.
once saved always saved folks go back to their sin and stay there.
and expect to get to Heaven. Where's that in the Bible?
Here's what Jesus said
SIN
No
More
Yeh, this Ravi Zacharias was an adulterer and committed other mortal sins but he's in Heaven (those who don't have a problem with adultery say)
But Catholics who are faithful to their spouses and don't commit mortal sins are going to Hell!
wow, that's some religion ya got there (once saved always saved)