Hunter Biden's "Business" Exchanged Over 1,000 Emails With Vice President Biden's Office

[Frankenstein]

Yes, trump was found to have rape E. Jean Carroll. Technically, he couldn't be found guilty of that, because state definition requires penetration with the penis. Trump penetrated her with his fingers. After the ruling, the judge released a statement explaining that technicality, but saying he did rape her according to the common usage of the word rape.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

A judge has now clarified that this is basically a legal distinction without a real-world difference. He says that what the jury found Trump did was in fact rape, as commonly understood.

They found him not guilty of rape buttercup, and it was a lie anyway, what woman allows herself to be pulled into a dressing room, and penetrated with anything without screaming, you know it's a lie but it's ok to lie to get Trump for you ninnies.

 

[BULLDOG]

They found him not guilty of rape buttercup, and it was a lie anyway, what woman allows herself to be pulled into a dressing room, and penetrated with anything without screaming, you know it's a lie but it's ok to lie to get Trump for you ninnies.

The judge and jury disagree with you.

 

[Frankenstein]

The judge and jury disagree with you.

Jury finds Trump liable for sexual abuse, awards accuser $5M

A jury has found Donald Trump liable for sexually abusing advice columnist E. Jean Carroll in 1996. Jurors awarded her $5 million in a judgment that could haunt the former president as he campaigns to regain the White House. The verdict was announced in a federal courtroom in New York City on...

apnews.com

So sorry you are wrong! Not really you are wrong all the time
The verdict was split: Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped, finding Trump responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse.

 

[Nostra]

Biden suggested they call Obama to ask if he was following instructions.

Why hasn't Barry come out to back up Tater's story?

 

[beautress]

If biden doesnt have anything to hide, why did he lie?

It's habitual. He likes the votes he gets when he tells his best whoppers, and his DNC minions buy it lock, stock, and barrel.

 

[beautress]

Why hasn't Barry come out to back up Tater's story?

Because he's mired in the deep state mud puddle. And it would be tacky.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Remember: Joe never talked to Hunter once about his business.

Not once.

The White House refused to allow the release of 200 emails referencing Hunter Biden's firm, citing executive privilege.

Hunter Biden’s firm, Joe’s VP office exchanged more than 1,000 emails: records

Hunter Biden’s Rosemont Seneca Partners investment firm traded more than 1,000 emails with Joe Biden’s office during his time as vice president, documents released by the National Archives show.…

nypost.com

Executive privilege is the (asserted) privilege of a president to receive candid advice from his staff without fear of the contents of that advice ever being disclosed.


Hunter Biden is not a government official. Executive privilege does not cover communications with him.

You know, I believe this for one key reason: The Bidens are STUPID.

We've all seen their evil and corruption, and their endlessly complex ways of deceiving the American people with lies and manipulations. We know that Joe and Hunter talked about business on a daily basis, so naturally they were communicating directly through the company's email servers, creating an easy breadcrumb trail, as opposed to talking in person. They're too STUPID for that.

 

[Dragonlady]

It depends on what's in them. Even an idiot like you can understand that, right?

Gee whiz Marvin. When I'm committing a crime, I put all of the information about my crimes into an email from my office to my co-conspirators, confessing everything, to be seen and handled by multiple government officials and White House Staff. Because I'm just that stupid.

You're dumber and more gullible than you seem.

 

[Dragonlady]

Why hasn't Barry come out to back up Tater's story?

Why should Democrats jump up and come forward and with "back up" to prove every lie Republicans tell is a lie? It's not on Democrats defend themselves against false allegations.

I know this concept is alien to you, FuckBoi, because you're always accusing others of lying with no evidence, but in the real world, YOU have to prove your claims, something Republicans haven't done since Bush41 was in office.

 

[Nostra]

Why should Democrats jump up and come forward and with "back up" to prove every lie Republicans tell is a lie? It's not on Democrats defend themselves against false allegations.

I know this concept is alien to you, FuckBoi, because you're always accusing others of lying with no evidence, but in the real world, YOU have to prove your claims, something Republicans haven't done since Bush41 was in office.

So you have nothing, vermin.

Got it,

 

[Dragonlady]

So you have nothing, vermin.

Got it,

I'm not the one using insults and lies. I'm using facts and links.

Answer the question. Why should anyone have to prove you're lying? It's up to you to prove you're telling the truth when you post. You call other "liars" on no evidence whatsoever.

Quite frankly, no one believes anything you post so you're wasting you time calling people names.