Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
None were reported by Trump. You don’t know if any were generated. In any case, a SAR is simply a bank flagging something potentially suspicious. A bank isn’t the DOJ, and something potentially suspicious is a long way from criminal.
I’ve had my credit cards blocked by the bank on more than one occasion. My wife and I travel and not necessarily together all the time. So sometimes the bank gets suspicious when payments are made in unexpected places. Do you think you can infer anything criminal from that fact?
My opinions are based on facts as I know them. I do believe intellectual honesty requires changing one's opinions when better information warrants that. You have offered zero information that would show me that I need to change my opinions.again, you are misrepresenting things. To argue with you on this would be to go around in endless circles. You're mind is set. Partisan narratives drive your responses.
No. Stupid question, there, fuckup.Are you claiming the DOJ can't disagree with the FBI director?
Again. No. You dope. The director had exactly zero authority to make that call. And it was wrong for the DOJ and its miserable AG to accept that recommendation.That it's in any way impossible to prosecute someone for criminal acts because the FBI director is saying that no reasonable prosecutor would pursue indicting.
Yes. We went over this before, fuckchop.You had not 1 but 2 AG's appointed by Trump.
Maybe he got advised to let the sleeping bitch lie. I don’t know. It hardly matters. The initial decision had been made.He obviously wanted her prosecuted. He said so on multiple occasions. If the facts warranted a prosecution. Why not prosecute.
It wasn't meaningless.Because you ask really seriously meaningless questions.
No. There was and is no point. Oblio and your post have a lot in common: pointlessness.It wasn't meaningless.
There was a point but I don't want to derail the thread so I'll leave it at that.
Thanks again for your answer.
After Comey made a beautiful presentation of her crimes we chanted lock her up. We can't help he said "We won't prosecute her, though." She's a Clinton.
So Trump is not guilty either. Am I right?Hunter Biden is not guilty of any criminal acts, unless and until it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, in a court of law, that he committed any criminal acts.
This is how the justice system in America works. Disagreeing with the statement above would make somebody appear to be un-American. There, I've said it. I've aid it all out for the world to see. Hunter Biden is not guilty. And he has even pleaded so.
Hunter Biden has not even had his day(s) in court and some people demand he be sentenced. We all know that's not how it works.
View attachment 886938
Hunter Biden pleads not guilty to tax charges brought by Special Counsel David Weiss
Hunter Biden pleaded not guilty in his initial appearance in federal court Thursday, after being charged with tax crimes out of Special Counsel David Weiss’ investigation.www.foxnews.com
Let's not forget the 146 SAR's generated by the Biden crime family. If ONE is generated, it's news. NONE were generated by Trump, 146 by Biden.
My bad, you don’t know if any were generated for Trump. And now it’s known as a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR), not a criminal activity report. It’s funny how you seem to claim it used to be named something else that doesn’t fit the acronym.None were GENERATED by Trump. Trump doesn't report SAR's. SAR's used to be known as "criminal activity reports."
Yes. There was a point.No. There was and is no point. Oblio and your post have a lot in common: pointlessness.
You obviously have memory problems, since you can't seem to remember my screenname. You should probably have that checked out. Dementia is an actual thing you know.No. Stupid question, there, fuckup.
Again. No. You dope. The director had exactly zero authority to make that call. And it was wrong for the DOJ and its miserable AG to accept that recommendation.
Yes. We went over this before, fuckchop.
Maybe he got advised to let the sleeping bitch lie. I don’t know. It hardly matters. The initial decision had been made.
I’m not mad. I’m amused.Yes. There was a point.
Don't be mad.
Keep warm and have a good day!
You obviously have memory problems, since you can't seem to remember my screenname. You should probably have that checked out. Dementia is an actual thing you know.
There was almost a sentence ^ in that second half of a posting effort.As to the rest it does matter. If you content the facts warranted it and she wasn't prosecuted because of Comey, and Lynch being biased.
Actually, it means less than nothing because the basic premise is untrue. Bank staff highlighted ‘suspicious activity’ in Trump-, Kushner-controlled accounts: reportTo quote another member here Fort Fun Indiana : "Which mean exactly nothing. Another ruse for the gullible morons."
so all the claims Trump is guilty by your side are lies? Or is that different?Hunter Biden is not guilty of any criminal acts, unless and until it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, in a court of law, that he committed any criminal acts.
This is how the justice system in America works. Disagreeing with the statement above would make somebody appear to be un-American. There, I've said it. I've aid it all out for the world to see. Hunter Biden is not guilty. And he has even pleaded so.
Hunter Biden has not even had his day(s) in court and some people demand he be sentenced. We all know that's not how it works.
View attachment 886938
Hunter Biden pleads not guilty to tax charges brought by Special Counsel David Weiss
Hunter Biden pleaded not guilty in his initial appearance in federal court Thursday, after being charged with tax crimes out of Special Counsel David Weiss’ investigation.
Don't feel sorry for me. I'm not the one unable to answer a post without forgetting people's name.I’m not mad. I’m amused.
And I’m also correct.
Your post was pointless.
Poor widdle fuckchop.
There was almost a sentence ^ in that second half of a posting effort.
Almost.
I feel sorry for you, fuckchop.Don't feel sorry for me. I'm not the one unable to answer a post without forgetting people's name.
He is "presumed innocent" unless convicted in a court of law. That presumption may be wrong.
That's okay. People suffering from dementia are often irrational. I forgive you.I feel sorry for you, fuckchop.
But not a great deal.
Nothing to forgive, fuckchop.That's okay. People suffering from dementia are often irrational. I forgive you.
Hunter has already appeared in court. He already pleaded.The only reason Hunter Biden has not had his day in court is because his Dad controls the the Justice Department which would be where everything starts.
Further, they have been sitting on the case, allowing the statue of limitations to run out.
