Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She went from full-time deputy chief of staff for Clinton to a part-timer, then started working for Teneo, a consulting firm led by former President Clinton aide Douglas Band.
The agency’s inspector general’s office this spring confirmed an investigation on the matter and on email exchanges between Abedin and Clinton.
Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has since 2013 led the effort to learn more about Abedin’s time at the State Department.
Last week, he sent a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry and others asking about an investigation into possible “criminal” conduct by Abedin over her pay and her possibly violating rules that govern vacation and sick time.
The purported State Department inspector general report found Abedin was overpaid by nearly $10,000 because she violated such rules while at the agency.
The 39-year-old Abedin, vice chairwoman of the Clinton campaign, is contesting the findings and has requested an administrative review of them, while her lawyer calls the report “fundamentally flawed.”
The Clinton campaign did not respond to a request Saturday for comment.
Abedin is married to former New York Democratic Rep. Anthony Weiner, who resigned from Congress in 2011 over a sexting scandal.
Larry J. Sabato, director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia, told The Washington Times that only political insiders will even know Abedin's name.
“But she's another building block in the image of Clinton being conveyed to voters," he said. "More and more, the current Clinton campaign is starting to remind me of the Clintons in the 1990s. At times, their controversies came in waves and filled news pages. It's happening all over again for Hillary in this campaign."
Abedin made roughly $69,000 in the first quarter of 2015, which would put her on pace to make $276,000 this year, according to news outlets’ analysis of federal reports.
The more these idiots talk about Magan Kelly and trump the more they deflect from the Clinton corruption which is what the Hillary lovers want. Flood the place with stupidity and ignore the real issues and the corruption of the "Demcratic" party front runner
Did you know Hillary is the subject of a criminal investigation by the FBI now??They've asked these questions already. Pretty soon it will be "revealed" by Jroc that Huma is (or was) Anthony Weiner's wife. Something widely known already.
25 years and you haven't laid a glove on the former Senator, Secretary of State, FLOTUS.... Don't you think it's time for a new strategy? Wait...what's that? All you know how to do is attack, smear, lie, and be as cruel as you can be? That's just sad.
Did you know Hillary is the subject of a criminal investigation by the FBI now??They've asked these questions already. Pretty soon it will be "revealed" by Jroc that Huma is (or was) Anthony Weiner's wife. Something widely known already.
25 years and you haven't laid a glove on the former Senator, Secretary of State, FLOTUS.... Don't you think it's time for a new strategy? Wait...what's that? All you know how to do is attack, smear, lie, and be as cruel as you can be? That's just sad.
No she's notDid you know Hillary is the subject of a criminal investigation by the FBI now??They've asked these questions already. Pretty soon it will be "revealed" by Jroc that Huma is (or was) Anthony Weiner's wife. Something widely known already.
25 years and you haven't laid a glove on the former Senator, Secretary of State, FLOTUS.... Don't you think it's time for a new strategy? Wait...what's that? All you know how to do is attack, smear, lie, and be as cruel as you can be? That's just sad.
The more these idiots talk about Magan Kelly and trump the more they deflect from the Clinton corruption which is what the Hillary lovers want. Flood the place with stupidity and ignore the real issues and the corruption of the "Demcratic" party front runner
It's not a criminal probe, and they're investigating the security of her e-mails. Which since how she was sending and receiving them is perfectly legal, it is likely to determine if there was any chance something leaked.
Not properly securing classified information is a felony, so an investigation into the security of her email system is a criminal probe that can lead to serious charges.It's not a criminal probe, and they're investigating the security of her e-mails. Which since how she was sending and receiving them is perfectly legal, it is likely to determine if there was any chance something leaked.
And who says that its a criminal probe? Is that the same anonymous source that insisted that the inspector generals were demanding a criminal probe of the emails in a letter they sent to the DOJ?Not properly securing classified information is a felony, so an investigation into the security of her email system is a criminal probe that can lead to serious charges.It's not a criminal probe, and they're investigating the security of her e-mails. Which since how she was sending and receiving them is perfectly legal, it is likely to determine if there was any chance something leaked.
Are you always this retarded???
If you Google it, there is ample information. Of course, the Liberal expect us to believe they are actively involved in the investigation and getting regular updates from the FBI though, don't they???And who says that its a criminal probe? Is that the same anonymous source that insisted that the inspector generals were demanding a criminal probe of the emails in a letter they sent to the DOJ?Not properly securing classified information is a felony, so an investigation into the security of her email system is a criminal probe that can lead to serious charges.It's not a criminal probe, and they're investigating the security of her e-mails. Which since how she was sending and receiving them is perfectly legal, it is likely to determine if there was any chance something leaked.
Are you always this retarded???
Because the FBI certainly hasn't said this.
If you Google it, there is ample information. Of course, the Liberal expect us to believe they are actively involved in the investigation and getting regular updates from the FBI though, don't they???And who says that its a criminal probe? Is that the same anonymous source that insisted that the inspector generals were demanding a criminal probe of the emails in a letter they sent to the DOJ?Not properly securing classified information is a felony, so an investigation into the security of her email system is a criminal probe that can lead to serious charges.It's not a criminal probe, and they're investigating the security of her e-mails. Which since how she was sending and receiving them is perfectly legal, it is likely to determine if there was any chance something leaked.
Are you always this retarded???
Because the FBI certainly hasn't said this.
View attachment 46883
When have you handled classified material??? Merely having it on an unsecured server and giving the IT guys (who didn't have security clearances) access to that server is a felony.
All you con posters on this thread are way out of the loop. This has been resolved for a week at least.
A Clinton Story Fraught With Inaccuracies How It Happened and What Next - NYTimes.com
