HUH?? Feminists say sex robots are a DANGER to women!!!

[ShootSpeeders]

Any fool can see it's just the opposite so why the outrage? Because feminists are all men-haters and if men like something, the crazy fems oppose it.

Sex robots a danger to women and children, UK campaigners argue

nov 24 2016 A UK academic is campaigning against sex robots, arguing they are dehumanising, isolating and will encourage people to consider women as property.

Hyper-realistic sex dolls are already widely available, but sex robots are still in development.

Kathleen Richardson, a senior research fellow in the ethics of robotics at De Montfort University, started the Campaign Against Sex Robots.

"I want people to stop thinking about the word 'robot' and think about the word 'property', and what we're being encouraged to do is have relationships with property," she told the ABC's Lateline program.

She argues that not only are sex robots "dehumanising and isolating", they are also inherently sexist.

"While we live in a world which still considers women as property, then it's not too much of a stretch of the imagination to start creating property that looks like women and then encouraging people to have the same sort of relationships.

 

[malikc6]

I can successfully say that to the bottom of my heart, I DESPISE 3rd wave feminists. They are complete scum and an abomination of the leftists.

 

[malikc6]

I'll tell you why these stupid retarded misandric freaks of nature hate this. Because these women feel if men can sleep with robots, then women will no longer be useful, and if women actually feel that way, it shows that sex was the only thing they had to offer in a relationship!

IF you actually are threatened by a sex machine and want them banned because sex was all you can give, you need to either make an improvement to yourself or kill yourself. I HATE feminists with a burning passion. IT's getting poisoning the minds of so many people!

 

[Vastator]

They're just pissed at the notion that; the better the technology gets, the more irrelevant they become.

 

[Silhouette]

From the OP link:

"While we live in a world which still considers women as property, then it's not too much of a stretch of the imagination to start creating property that looks like women and then encouraging people to have the same sort of relationships."...Dr Richardson is concerned that there is a strange complacency when it comes to sex robots...."Let me put this way: If we were to create a robot that looked like an 18th century slave, there would be horror.

"But we can look upon women as these over-sexualised images in pornography and in prostitution and it doesn't raise an eyebrow...."And the reason why it doesn't raise an eyebrow is because people still think that is socially acceptable to view women as nothing more than a sexual object."

She has a point.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

From the OP link:

"While we live in a world which still considers women as property, then it's not too much of a stretch of the imagination to start creating property that looks like women and then encouraging people to have the same sort of relationships."...Dr Richardson is concerned that there is a strange complacency when it comes to sex robots...."Let me put this way: If we were to create a robot that looked like an 18th century slave, there would be horror.

"But we can look upon women as these over-sexualised images in pornography and in prostitution and it doesn't raise an eyebrow...."And the reason why it doesn't raise an eyebrow is because people still think that is socially acceptable to view women as nothing more than a sexual object."

She has a point.

No she doesn't.

She is being silly.

 

[theHawk]

Feminists can't have men being free of women. They must always remain slaves to them. They've fucked up our laws so that women can **** over men and take most of their wealth no matter how bad they act. They support welfare from the state so women don't need to rely on any one man, they can just leech off all working men.

Feminists are the biggest hypocrites of all the lefties. They hate the fact that men see women as sexual objects, but it's perfectly fine to use men for their own pleasure and rob them of their wealth.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

These women are terrified that they will never again be able to bring a fake rape claim.

The inventors need to come up with a male sex robot.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

I'll tell you why these stupid retarded misandric freaks of nature hate this. Because these women feel if men can sleep with robots, then women will no longer be useful, and if women actually feel that way, it shows that sex was the only thing they had to offer in a relationship!

Women want one thing out of marriage and that is the man's money. If men don't marry, women will have to get a job.

 

[Roudy]

In that case, as a man, I think the possession and use of all vibrators should be against the law. We don't get our dolls they don't get their dildos.

 

[Silhouette]

From the OP link:

"While we live in a world which still considers women as property, then it's not too much of a stretch of the imagination to start creating property that looks like women and then encouraging people to have the same sort of relationships."...Dr Richardson is concerned that there is a strange complacency when it comes to sex robots...."Let me put this way: If we were to create a robot that looked like an 18th century slave, there would be horror.

"But we can look upon women as these over-sexualised images in pornography and in prostitution and it doesn't raise an eyebrow...."And the reason why it doesn't raise an eyebrow is because people still think that is socially acceptable to view women as nothing more than a sexual object."

She has a point.

No she doesn't.

She is being silly.

No. She isn't. The dehumanizing of women is taken to its extreme in sex robots.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

From the OP link:

"While we live in a world which still considers women as property, then it's not too much of a stretch of the imagination to start creating property that looks like women and then encouraging people to have the same sort of relationships."...Dr Richardson is concerned that there is a strange complacency when it comes to sex robots...."Let me put this way: If we were to create a robot that looked like an 18th century slave, there would be horror.

"But we can look upon women as these over-sexualised images in pornography and in prostitution and it doesn't raise an eyebrow...."And the reason why it doesn't raise an eyebrow is because people still think that is socially acceptable to view women as nothing more than a sexual object."

She has a point.

No she doesn't.

She is being silly.

No. She isn't. The dehumanizing of women is taken to its extreme in sex robots.

Which puts no women in danger of anything but being ignored.

When they start making male sex robots the ignored women can feel better about being worthless.

 

[blastoff]

A new option to the world's oldest profession. You'd think the feminazis would be overjoyed.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Any fool can see it's just the opposite so why the outrage? Because feminists are all men-haters and if men like something, the crazy fems oppose it.

Sex robots a danger to women and children, UK campaigners argue

nov 24 2016 A UK academic is campaigning against sex robots, arguing they are dehumanising, isolating and will encourage people to consider women as property.

Hyper-realistic sex dolls are already widely available, but sex robots are still in development.

Kathleen Richardson, a senior research fellow in the ethics of robotics at De Montfort University, started the Campaign Against Sex Robots.

"I want people to stop thinking about the word 'robot' and think about the word 'property', and what we're being encouraged to do is have relationships with property," she told the ABC's Lateline program.

She argues that not only are sex robots "dehumanising and isolating", they are also inherently sexist.

"While we live in a world which still considers women as property, then it's not too much of a stretch of the imagination to start creating property that looks like women and then encouraging people to have the same sort of relationships.

Dyson is supposedly working on a realistic mouth attachment for their newest vacuum cleaner

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

If I did not have a mate, I would rather hold out for the real thing. I would think having a sex robot would eliminate a lot of the drive necessary to go out and find someone.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

If I did not have a mate, I would rather hold out for the real thing. I would think having a sex robot would eliminate a lot of the drive necessary to go out and find someone.

With a satisfactory sex robot why would anyone want to find someone? Not even a sex robot. A companion robot would, in most cases, completely eliminate the need for a human at all.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

If I did not have a mate, I would rather hold out for the real thing. I would think having a sex robot would eliminate a lot of the drive necessary to go out and find someone.

With a satisfactory sex robot why would anyone want to find someone? Not even a sex robot. A companion robot would, in most cases, completely eliminate the need for a human at all.

What makes us great is our soul, and sex needs to be great or why do it. Robots will never have any kind of soul.

 

[mdk]

If I did not have a mate, I would rather hold out for the real thing. I would think having a sex robot would eliminate a lot of the drive necessary to go out and find someone.

With a satisfactory sex robot why would anyone want to find someone? Not even a sex robot. A companion robot would, in most cases, completely eliminate the need for a human at all.

What makes us great is our soul, and sex needs to be great or why do it. Robots will never have any kind of soul.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Damn I wish I was 30 years younger.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Soul is not necessary for mind blowing sex. Maybe soul is necessary for grits and gravy. Men and women like to think that some spark of humanity is necessary for good sex. It isn't. Sex is mechanical with a bit of decent acting tossed in.