HUGE!! - Ex-Biden Aide Neera Tanden Admits Under Oath to Congress That She Controlled Biden’s Autopen

So the whole statement was too complicated for you. Biden didn't know half (at absolute minimum) of the documents his signature appeared on.
Not really

Your implication is that low level aids are using auto pen to sign documents without approval

If that was the case, you would see those documents being revoked
 
Not really

Your implication is that low level aids are using auto pen to sign documents without approval

If that was the case, you would see those documents being revoked

Put Biden on the stand.

Total hilarity as the old codger would never ever be able to remember
 

A former top aide to President Joe Biden said she was authorized to direct autopen signatures but was unaware of who in the president's inner circle was giving her final clearance, according to a source familiar with the aide's closed-door testimony in front of Congress Tuesday.

Neera Tanden, the former director of Biden's Domestic Policy Council, testified for hours Tuesday during an interview in front of the House Oversight Committee, which is investigating the former president's mental acuity and his use of an automatic signature tool that allowed aides to sign pardons, memos and other important documents on Biden's behalf.

During Tanden's interview before Congress, which lasted more than five hours, she told lawmakers that, in her role as staff secretary and senior advisor to the former president between 2021 and 2023, she was authorized to direct autopen signatures on behalf of Biden, an Oversight Committee official told Fox News. The system of approval used, according to Tanden's testimony relayed to Fox News, was inherited from previous administrations.

But Tanden, who said she had limited interactions with Biden, described an approval process that left her in the dark about who specifically was giving final approval on the decisions to use the automatic signature tool, sources told Fox News.


Tanden testified that to get approval for the use of autopen signatures she would send decision memos to members of Biden's inner circle. However, she added that she was not aware of what actions or approvals took place between the time she sent the decision memo and the time she received it back with the necessary approval.

I know autopengate will go nowhere, cuz democrats are bullet proof, but we should at least know just how corrupt these arse holes really are.
I already knew!
 
Just like I said in the other three threads about this: It isn't the "bombshell" you think it is.

Every president uses the so called autopen to sign some of the hundred of documents requiring the president's signature every week. Someone has to be in charge of it.

tRump uses one as well. Someone runs it for him.

You should look at the whole testimony instead of just the cherry picked bits your handlers want you to see.
Tater is the only one who had underlings using it without his knowledge, moron.

Big difference, but you are obviously too stupid to comprehend it.
 
However, she added that she was not aware of what actions or approvals took place between the time she sent the decision memo and the time she received it back with the necessary approval.


But the necessary approval from whom? Who signed it, if anyone? Did it just say "approved?" I read the article and it didn't say. I'll listen to her testimony if I can find it.*

I remember a brief exchange during the testimony of LTC Oliver North about his role in the Iran-Contra efforts. At one point, he claimed he had gotten back an approval memo for some action he proposed with the "approved" line checked instead of initialed. There was a brief discussion of whether there was such a thing as "forging a check mark."

North also would send memos ending with a line such as "Unless otherwise directed, I will proceed as described above." This allowed him to claim that silence from the receiver indicated approval, while the person addressed could (and did) later say that they never got the memo.

The system of approval used, according to Tanden's testimony relayed to Fox News, was inherited from previous administrations.

I don't doubt it.

In a system like ours, in which all executive power is vested in one individual, that individual will have to trust staffers to act on his or her behalf. To what degree staffers carefully follow what they know to be the wishes of the executive will vary.

The Biden Administration was unique in that he was clearly unfit to make decisions for much, if not most, of his time in office. It's hard to know if any indivdual use of the autopen complied with his desires as president, because we don't know for sure that he was aware of being president.

I don't know of any autopen signing that could be said to violate what we know about Biden's thought process during his more lucid moments. I understand the desire to invalidate things like pardons signed by the autopen. But I don't favor that. Why prosecute Hunter Biden, for example? I see no good coming from that.

Will ever document ever signed by an autopen by any previous president now be invalid?

*Of all of this, the most scandalous as far as I'm concerned is the Democrats' cowardice in not attending the hearings.
 
Now we need to get to the bottom of who controls Trump's Autopen.



President Trump on Friday deflected when asked if he signed the order to invoke the Alien Enemies Act, an 18th-century wartime law, to deport Venezuelan migrants allegedly linked to the Tren de Aragua gang.

“We want to get criminals out of our country number one. I don’t know when it was signed, because I didn’t sign it,” Trump told reporters before departing the White House on Friday. “Other people handled it.”




Here's the proclamation:



Oh my! Look whose signature is on it!!!

TRUMP-AUTOPEN.jpg




That is identical to this signature on another document:

is-this-autopen-or-is-this-by-donald-trump-v0-19gaiouuq9rd1.webp




The obvious conclusion is someone signed the proclamation using Trump's name! Trump even admitted he didn't sign it!

The person who is the real President in the Trump administration is the person who controls the Autopen!
 
Now we need to get to the bottom of who controls Trump's Autopen.



President Trump on Friday deflected when asked if he signed the order to invoke the Alien Enemies Act, an 18th-century wartime law, to deport Venezuelan migrants allegedly linked to the Tren de Aragua gang.

“We want to get criminals out of our country number one. I don’t know when it was signed, because I didn’t sign it,” Trump told reporters before departing the White House on Friday. “Other people handled it.”




Here's the proclamation:



Oh my! Look whose signature is on it!!!

TRUMP-AUTOPEN.jpg




That is identical to this signature on another document:

is-this-autopen-or-is-this-by-donald-trump-v0-19gaiouuq9rd1.webp




The obvious conclusion is someone signed the proclamation using Trump's name! Trump even admitted he didn't sign it!

The person who is the real President in the Trump administration is the person who controls the Autopen!

Those aren't identical.
 
Now we need to get to the bottom of who controls Trump's Autopen.



President Trump on Friday deflected when asked if he signed the order to invoke the Alien Enemies Act, an 18th-century wartime law, to deport Venezuelan migrants allegedly linked to the Tren de Aragua gang.

“We want to get criminals out of our country number one. I don’t know when it was signed, because I didn’t sign it,” Trump told reporters before departing the White House on Friday. “Other people handled it.”




Here's the proclamation:



Oh my! Look whose signature is on it!!!

TRUMP-AUTOPEN.jpg




That is identical to this signature on another document:

is-this-autopen-or-is-this-by-donald-trump-v0-19gaiouuq9rd1.webp




The obvious conclusion is someone signed the proclamation using Trump's name! Trump even admitted he didn't sign it!

The person who is the real President in the Trump administration is the person who controls the Autopen!
Thise two wigs are no where near the same, stupid.
 
They most certainly are.

And Trump said quite plainly he did not sign the proclamation.

Someone else did. The real president did.

I don’t know when it was signed, because I didn’t sign it."

I don't know who signed what, but those aren't identical.
 
Not really

Your implication is that low level aids are using auto pen to sign documents without approval

If that was the case, you would see those documents being revoked
What the hell, not sure if you have ADD or are just plain stupid. The statement is: "was unaware of who in the president's inner circle was giving her final clearance", Indicating she was given approval and didn't know who gave the clearance.

Regarding your other stupid statement, how the hell would Biden revoke anything when he didn't know what was being signed.
 
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom