Huffpost-~ Time to bow out, Hillary

Wyatt earp

Diamond Member
Apr 21, 2012
69,975
16,392
2,180
Wow, never thought I would see this from the liberal Huffpost


Time to Bow Out, Hillary


Hillary Clinton seems to have escaped the ferocious grueling at the Benghazi congressional hearing. The 13-minute withdrawal from the presidential race notwithstanding, she is all set to clinch the Democratic nomination. Hillary might as well become the next U.S. president. There's a catch though. Legacy politics doesn't favor her. She's not Justin Trudeau and her election will not a good omen for the U.S. -- and the world.

First things first, Hillary hasn't been out of power for the last 23 years. She was still basking in the glory of being the first lady when she got elected as a (non-resident) senator from New York in 2000. Then came her first presidential campaign and the subsequent assuming of the office of the secretary of state. The Benghazi attacks and the foot dragging over what later became the biggest global security challenge (Syria) are two of her many legacies. Then there is the famous email scandal.

The problem with Hillary's election as the president is simple. She hasn't left the position of authority in the first place. Ironically, her rise to fame (and power) is also attributed to her status as the first lady of the U.S. Otherwise; many other Democratic female leaders are far more capable, and, more importantly, self-made stalwarts. Hillary's supporters cite her gender and the lack of a U.S. women president as her key strengths. The argument, however, seems vapid and vacuous when one looks at other and more promising women among the Democrats.


°Snip°




If Hillary is so intent on carrying forward the Clinton legacy, she better bows out and prepare Chelsea for the post. Junior Clinton will be better equipped -- like Justin -- to bring real change. She'll have a decade or two to polish her skills and connect with the people. Hillary is part of the old guard with no real agenda for development and seems clueless (like Obama) on managing the super power status of U.S. Simply put, not the right presidential mater.
huffpost_loader-b9a185692576e0deabfad7abfb05ebba.gif
 
I'm still waiting for a list of her career accomplishments that in some way qualify her to be president. There's certainly a long string of failures, scandals, and lying in the few positions she's held.
 
Wow, never thought I would see this from the liberal Huffpost


Time to Bow Out, Hillary


Hillary Clinton seems to have escaped the ferocious grueling at the Benghazi congressional hearing. The 13-minute withdrawal from the presidential race notwithstanding, she is all set to clinch the Democratic nomination. Hillary might as well become the next U.S. president. There's a catch though. Legacy politics doesn't favor her. She's not Justin Trudeau and her election will not a good omen for the U.S. -- and the world.

First things first, Hillary hasn't been out of power for the last 23 years. She was still basking in the glory of being the first lady when she got elected as a (non-resident) senator from New York in 2000. Then came her first presidential campaign and the subsequent assuming of the office of the secretary of state. The Benghazi attacks and the foot dragging over what later became the biggest global security challenge (Syria) are two of her many legacies. Then there is the famous email scandal.

The problem with Hillary's election as the president is simple. She hasn't left the position of authority in the first place. Ironically, her rise to fame (and power) is also attributed to her status as the first lady of the U.S. Otherwise; many other Democratic female leaders are far more capable, and, more importantly, self-made stalwarts. Hillary's supporters cite her gender and the lack of a U.S. women president as her key strengths. The argument, however, seems vapid and vacuous when one looks at other and more promising women among the Democrats.


°Snip°




If Hillary is so intent on carrying forward the Clinton legacy, she better bows out and prepare Chelsea for the post. Junior Clinton will be better equipped -- like Justin -- to bring real change. She'll have a decade or two to polish her skills and connect with the people. Hillary is part of the old guard with no real agenda for development and seems clueless (like Obama) on managing the super power status of U.S. Simply put, not the right presidential mater.
huffpost_loader-b9a185692576e0deabfad7abfb05ebba.gif
How did Marsha Blackburn[R] get on there?
 
Wow, never thought I would see this from the liberal Huffpost


Time to Bow Out, Hillary


Hillary Clinton seems to have escaped the ferocious grueling at the Benghazi congressional hearing. The 13-minute withdrawal from the presidential race notwithstanding, she is all set to clinch the Democratic nomination. Hillary might as well become the next U.S. president. There's a catch though. Legacy politics doesn't favor her. She's not Justin Trudeau and her election will not a good omen for the U.S. -- and the world.

First things first, Hillary hasn't been out of power for the last 23 years. She was still basking in the glory of being the first lady when she got elected as a (non-resident) senator from New York in 2000. Then came her first presidential campaign and the subsequent assuming of the office of the secretary of state. The Benghazi attacks and the foot dragging over what later became the biggest global security challenge (Syria) are two of her many legacies. Then there is the famous email scandal.

The problem with Hillary's election as the president is simple. She hasn't left the position of authority in the first place. Ironically, her rise to fame (and power) is also attributed to her status as the first lady of the U.S. Otherwise; many other Democratic female leaders are far more capable, and, more importantly, self-made stalwarts. Hillary's supporters cite her gender and the lack of a U.S. women president as her key strengths. The argument, however, seems vapid and vacuous when one looks at other and more promising women among the Democrats.


°Snip°




If Hillary is so intent on carrying forward the Clinton legacy, she better bows out and prepare Chelsea for the post. Junior Clinton will be better equipped -- like Justin -- to bring real change. She'll have a decade or two to polish her skills and connect with the people. Hillary is part of the old guard with no real agenda for development and seems clueless (like Obama) on managing the super power status of U.S. Simply put, not the right presidential mater.
huffpost_loader-b9a185692576e0deabfad7abfb05ebba.gif
How did Marsha Blackburn[R] get on there?


?

Really? Missed that.
 
Wow, never thought I would see this from the liberal Huffpost


Time to Bow Out, Hillary


Hillary Clinton seems to have escaped the ferocious grueling at the Benghazi congressional hearing. The 13-minute withdrawal from the presidential race notwithstanding, she is all set to clinch the Democratic nomination. Hillary might as well become the next U.S. president. There's a catch though. Legacy politics doesn't favor her. She's not Justin Trudeau and her election will not a good omen for the U.S. -- and the world.

First things first, Hillary hasn't been out of power for the last 23 years. She was still basking in the glory of being the first lady when she got elected as a (non-resident) senator from New York in 2000. Then came her first presidential campaign and the subsequent assuming of the office of the secretary of state. The Benghazi attacks and the foot dragging over what later became the biggest global security challenge (Syria) are two of her many legacies. Then there is the famous email scandal.

The problem with Hillary's election as the president is simple. She hasn't left the position of authority in the first place. Ironically, her rise to fame (and power) is also attributed to her status as the first lady of the U.S. Otherwise; many other Democratic female leaders are far more capable, and, more importantly, self-made stalwarts. Hillary's supporters cite her gender and the lack of a U.S. women president as her key strengths. The argument, however, seems vapid and vacuous when one looks at other and more promising women among the Democrats.


°Snip°




If Hillary is so intent on carrying forward the Clinton legacy, she better bows out and prepare Chelsea for the post. Junior Clinton will be better equipped -- like Justin -- to bring real change. She'll have a decade or two to polish her skills and connect with the people. Hillary is part of the old guard with no real agenda for development and seems clueless (like Obama) on managing the super power status of U.S. Simply put, not the right presidential mater.
huffpost_loader-b9a185692576e0deabfad7abfb05ebba.gif
How did Marsha Blackburn[R] get on there?


?

Really? Missed that.
Her picture is second to the last photo.
 
Wow, never thought I would see this from the liberal Huffpost


Time to Bow Out, Hillary


Hillary Clinton seems to have escaped the ferocious grueling at the Benghazi congressional hearing. The 13-minute withdrawal from the presidential race notwithstanding, she is all set to clinch the Democratic nomination. Hillary might as well become the next U.S. president. There's a catch though. Legacy politics doesn't favor her. She's not Justin Trudeau and her election will not a good omen for the U.S. -- and the world.

First things first, Hillary hasn't been out of power for the last 23 years. She was still basking in the glory of being the first lady when she got elected as a (non-resident) senator from New York in 2000. Then came her first presidential campaign and the subsequent assuming of the office of the secretary of state. The Benghazi attacks and the foot dragging over what later became the biggest global security challenge (Syria) are two of her many legacies. Then there is the famous email scandal.

The problem with Hillary's election as the president is simple. She hasn't left the position of authority in the first place. Ironically, her rise to fame (and power) is also attributed to her status as the first lady of the U.S. Otherwise; many other Democratic female leaders are far more capable, and, more importantly, self-made stalwarts. Hillary's supporters cite her gender and the lack of a U.S. women president as her key strengths. The argument, however, seems vapid and vacuous when one looks at other and more promising women among the Democrats.


°Snip°




If Hillary is so intent on carrying forward the Clinton legacy, she better bows out and prepare Chelsea for the post. Junior Clinton will be better equipped -- like Justin -- to bring real change. She'll have a decade or two to polish her skills and connect with the people. Hillary is part of the old guard with no real agenda for development and seems clueless (like Obama) on managing the super power status of U.S. Simply put, not the right presidential mater.
huffpost_loader-b9a185692576e0deabfad7abfb05ebba.gif
How did Marsha Blackburn[R] get on there?


?

Really? Missed that.
Her picture is second to the last photo.


Oh I screwed up on my phone when I copied it, c n p originally the entire article, my US message board mobile won't let me delete pictures for some reason. Or delete a create a thread.
 
Written by a freelance reporter from Islamabad? What's next, change the Constitution so Putin can run? Leave it to the Hillary-haters to latch onto any goofy scenario they can, since they really don't have anything else..., like a viable candidate! :laugh2:
 
Written by a freelance reporter from Islamabad? What's next, change the Constitution so Putin can run? Leave it to the Hillary-haters to latch onto any goofy scenario they can, since they really don't have anything else..., like a viable candidate! :laugh2:


WTF you yapping about clown? I was reading your bible and was surprised they had this in it.
 
Written by a freelance reporter from Islamabad? What's next, change the Constitution so Putin can run? Leave it to the Hillary-haters to latch onto any goofy scenario they can, since they really don't have anything else..., like a viable candidate!
WTF you yapping about clown? I was reading your bible and was surprised they had this in it.
Just shows you they're more open than the typical wingnut site, but you have to check the source, so you don't end up looking like the clown.
 
Written by a freelance reporter from Islamabad? What's next, change the Constitution so Putin can run? Leave it to the Hillary-haters to latch onto any goofy scenario they can, since they really don't have anything else..., like a viable candidate!
WTF you yapping about clown? I was reading your bible and was surprised they had this in it.
Just shows you they're more open than the typical wingnut site, but you have to check the source, so you don't end up looking like the clown.

Why check the source, the Damn liberal huffpost posted it?

Also it does bring up good points on how much folks like you are kool aid drinkers and they are telling you who to vote for, against your own logic and better reason/ judgement.

As the article states, their is better more Qualified democrat women then hillary...

You guys are such sheep...
 
Why check the source, the Damn liberal huffpost posted it? Also it does bring up good points on how much folks like you are kool aid drinkers and they are telling you who to vote for against logic and better reason and judgement. As the article states, their is better Qualified democrat women then hillary... You guys are such sheep...
The sheep are the ones who give it credence and repost it. Huffpost posts all sorts of things. They're not like Breitbart or other wingnut sites that only post things that slant one way. Your bias got you egg on your face this time.
 
Written by a freelance reporter from Islamabad? What's next, change the Constitution so Putin can run? Leave it to the Hillary-haters to latch onto any goofy scenario they can, since they really don't have anything else..., like a viable candidate!
WTF you yapping about clown? I was reading your bible and was surprised they had this in it.
Just shows you they're more open than the typical wingnut site, but you have to check the source, so you don't end up looking like the clown.

Why check the source, the Damn liberal huffpost posted it?

Also it does bring up good points on how much folks like you are kool aid drinkers and they are telling you who to vote for, against your own logic and better reason/ judgement.

As the article states, their is better more Qualified democrat women then hillary...

You guys are such sheep...

Okay...if someone writes that Trump should step down or Taylor Swift should stop singing; should they heed the advice and their fans should as well because it was written?

What is the standing of the person offering the advice?
 
Written by a freelance reporter from Islamabad? What's next, change the Constitution so Putin can run? Leave it to the Hillary-haters to latch onto any goofy scenario they can, since they really don't have anything else..., like a viable candidate!
WTF you yapping about clown? I was reading your bible and was surprised they had this in it.
Just shows you they're more open than the typical wingnut site, but you have to check the source, so you don't end up looking like the clown.

Why check the source, the Damn liberal huffpost posted it?

Also it does bring up good points on how much folks like you are kool aid drinkers and they are telling you who to vote for, against your own logic and better reason/ judgement.

As the article states, their is better more Qualified democrat women then hillary...

You guys are such sheep...

Yea, she would definitely be better qualified had she been a brain surgeon instead of a US Senator and Sec of State. You cons are so laughable.
 
All you need to know about Hillary's qualifications is the Conservatives are afraid to compare Her qualifications with their candidate's side-by-side.

And if they were to ever attempt it; Hillary's qualifications will all be editorialized to the point of absurdity.
 
Written by a freelance reporter from Islamabad? What's next, change the Constitution so Putin can run? Leave it to the Hillary-haters to latch onto any goofy scenario they can, since they really don't have anything else..., like a viable candidate!
WTF you yapping about clown? I was reading your bible and was surprised they had this in it.
Just shows you they're more open than the typical wingnut site, but you have to check the source, so you don't end up looking like the clown.

Why check the source, the Damn liberal huffpost posted it?

Also it does bring up good points on how much folks like you are kool aid drinkers and they are telling you who to vote for, against your own logic and better reason/ judgement.

As the article states, their is better more Qualified democrat women then hillary...

You guys are such sheep...

Yea, she would definitely be better qualified had she been a brain surgeon instead of a US Senator and Sec of State. You cons are so laughable.
WTF? She is more qualified than Ben Carson. So what?
Her record of graft and corruption, bribe taking and disdain for rules and laws immediately disqualifies her. The fact that Democrats dont really care about these things is testament to their own lack of integrity.
 
All you need to know about Hillary's qualifications is the Conservatives are afraid to compare Her qualifications with their candidate's side-by-side.

And if they were to ever attempt it; Hillary's qualifications will all be editorialized to the point of absurdity.
Who is the Republican candidate?
Oops.
You are truly a ditz.
 
Her record of graft and corruption, bribe taking and disdain for rules and laws immediately disqualifies her.

That sounds serious, I think that should be investigated......
The fact that Democrats dont really care about these things is testament to their own lack of integrity.

ct-hillary-clinton-testifies-on-benghazi-20151022.jpeg


:alcoholic:
It wont be investigated because Democrats dont care. They want power and that's all they want. If Clinton will get it for them, they're for Clinton. If Sanders, then they're for Sanders. Ethics, experience, views, really have nothing to do with it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top