As soon as you show a quote of me saying that they all do. The text you provided clearly indicates I am speaking of climate scientists. The full text below is even more clear. Your dishonesty should embarrass you.Go ahead, prove it crick
NOAA comes clean ...
The biggest assumption, completely unproven, is that an additional 120ppm of CO2 can make a measurable increase in temperature. What they don't advertise is that their models are tuned to produce 2 to 3 times more warming than the GHG effect of CO2 alone. It's dishonest how they package their...www.usmessageboard.com
Here is my full statement from that post:
"Literary license. Obviously, the IPCC's work is assessing the conclusions of the world's climate scientists. And better than 99% of those scientists agree with the conclusions stated in the IPCC's assessment reports; indicating that climate scientists are very widely in full agreement as to the basics of AGW. Surveys of all branches of science also show very high agreement with IPCC conclusions but probably shy of the 99% mark. Tell me, what percentage of the world's scientists, either just climatologists or all of them, agree with your position on this matter?"
How do you come to conclude that you can win this silly argument by lying?