Zone1 How Would You React if your Religion were Proven False?

You are a moron.
you've lost your mind, religion is not philosophy when written as bibles strewn w/ forgeries lies and fallacies on nearly every page. ... think again without being greedy in an attempt to warrant accountability - honesty.

the desert religions are fabrications used by the crucifiers to persecute and victimize the innocent - found in varying locations referred to as the bible belt ... texas being more than accommodating for their dementia - zing as an example.
 
the desert religions are fabrications used by the crucifiers to persecute and victimize the innocent - found in varying locations referred to as the bible belt ... texas being more than accommodating for their dementia - zing as an example.
Says who?
 
the desert religions are fabrications used by the crucifiers to persecute and victimize the innocent - found in varying locations referred to as the bible belt ... texas being more than accommodating for their dementia - zing as an example.
Says who?

explained to you previously -

1753757069849.webp


recorded history for all three desert religions from their beginnings to the present day ... the ones you worship.
 
Not according to billions of people or history.

lying is a tool of the guilty ...

1753795942879.webp


the bible belt, cancer of america has never been limited by numbers or raw dishonesty, evil.
 
Regarding the criticism of Islam way up the list, I didn't see any reference to the fact that Muhamad's relatives and first wife were Christians and that He believed He was bringing Christianity to Arabia. He tried to warn the Christians of Constaninople, but they refused to hear Him. Later it was so called Christians who did their best to destroy Constaninople. Later, it was Turks who did it.
 
15th post
Lots of things are true but aren't proven by "physical evidence".
True to a point. I'll allow that there might be a God ,or even multiple gods. How did you decide the one you chose was the one and only God?
 
Regarding the criticism of Islam way up the list, I didn't see any reference to the fact that Muhamad's relatives and first wife were Christians and that He believed He was bringing Christianity to Arabia. He tried to warn the Christians of Constaninople, but they refused to hear Him. Later it was so called Christians who did their best to destroy Constaninople. Later, it was Turks who did it.
Try and stay in the current time
 
Science is based on Physcial evidence that proves a hypothesis true or false. The same should apply to christianity.
40% of all science is invalid
100% of any religious belief is valid
The claim that half of all published research is false or invalid is a serious concern highlighted in several studies and discussions, particularly stemming from John Ioannidis's 2005 paper, ""Why Most Published Research Findings Are False"". While not a universal truth, this sentiment reflects a significant issue of irreproducibility and poor study design in various scientific fields, with estimates of invalid research ranging widely from a quarter to over half of published papers.

Factors Contributing to Invalid Research
  • Irreproducibility:
    A core problem is the inability of researchers to replicate the findings of previous studies. A landmark 2015 study by the biotech firm Amgen, for instance, found they could reproduce only 6 of 53 "landmark" cancer studies.

  • Poor Methodological Practices:
    Many studies suffer from small sample sizes, lack of sufficient statistical power, and biased data analysis.

  • Publication Bias:
    Studies with negative or non-significant findings are less likely to be published, creating a skewed view of the research landscape.

  • Conflicts of Interest:
    Financial or other biases can influence study design and reporting, leading to inaccurate conclusions.

  • Emphasis on "Fashionable Trends":
    An obsession with pursuing popular, but often scientifically insignificant, trends can lead to flawed research.
Consequences of Invalid Research
  • Wasted Resources: Invalid research wastes considerable time and money.

  • Misguided Public Policy and Clinical Practice: The public, policymakers, and clinicians may make decisions based on false or unreliable findings, which can have harmful consequences.

  • Erosion of Public Trust: The prevalence of invalid studies, especially those involving fraud, erodes trust in science.
 
Back
Top Bottom