How would Jesus be treated by the media today?

[LeftofLeft]

I didn't say Jesus WAS a socialist or a marxist...I said the right would CALL him that

No they wouldn’t… they would call Him Jesus. “Socialist” and “Marxists” which are State terms. Conservatives know Jesus would never want the State ultimately responsible for his work nor would he want the State acting as a middleman that needs to pay off its cronies.

 

[pknopp]

No they wouldn’t… they would call Him Jesus. “Socialist” and “Marxists” which are State terms. Conservatives know Jesus would never want the State ultimately responsible for his work nor would he want the State acting as a middleman that needs to pay off its cronies.

There are tens of thousands of homeless people so you better step up then,

 

[LeftofLeft]

There are tens of thousands of homeless people so you better step up then,

So should the State. Jesus said to give to Caeser (the State) what is Caesar’s. All we ever hear from Caeser is “need more money”. Need to take a look and analysis to make certain the state is managing the problem effectively.

 

[pknopp]

So should the State.

That's true. Less to the war machine and corporation and more to the lesser of these. No argument there from me.

 

[LeftofLeft]

That's true. Less to the war machine and corporation and more to the lesser of these. No argument there from me.

Less to the bureaucrats and cronies. Cut the overhead tied to the program. The defense budgets and corporate tax breaks create jobs and drive more revenue into the Treasury to help pay for social programs.

 

[pknopp]

Less to the bureaucrats and cronies. Cut the overhead tied to the program. The defense budgets and corporate tax breaks create jobs and drive more revenue into the Treasury to help pay for social programs.

Funny you note that government money creates jobs. I disagree.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Funny you note that government money creates jobs. I disagree.

Who or what should create jobs? Why? What would make you agree?

 

[pknopp]

Who or what should create jobs? Why? What would make you agree?

A lot of the business that went to Asia should.

 

[22lcidw]

There are tens of thousands of homeless people so you better step up then,

Progs are blowing wealth in all ways to weaken us. They will kill many and end many problems when in full power or there will be massive poverty.

 

[LeftofLeft]

A lot of the business that went to Asia should.

Asia is undercutting US by using elderly and children to pay them far less than the arbitrary inflated wages liberals are proposing. How accountable is Asia to environmental regs? Shit, even Greta won’t wag her finger at Asia. When will you people?

 

[pknopp]

Asia is undercutting US by using elderly and children to pay them far less than the arbitrary inflated wages liberals are proposing. How accountable is Asia to environmental regs? Shit, even Greta won’t wag her finger at Asia. When will you people?

They do both which does nothing to address what I said.

 

[skye]

The same He was treated then.

Probably even much worse......by the Satanist Left.

 

[whitehall]

Jesus? How would the Roman barbarians be viewed by the media at the time when they executed a citizen who posed no military threat to them? My guess is that the media would have been the propaganda arm of the Empire just as they are the propaganda arm of the current democrat administration.

 

[LeftofLeft]

They do both which does nothing to address what I said.

Asia does both? Where is a Greta?

 

[pknopp]

Asia does both? Where is a Greta?

Both of what was said that I replied to. Read it.

 

[The_Lyrical_Miracle]

The right wing media would call him a socialist and a marxist

and leftists would call him an individualist, homophobe, transphobe, bigoted, racist, sexist monster, as they do with anyone whom they disagree with.

And they would disagree with most of the gospel once you got underneath the false soft cushion that leftists try to perpetuate.

 

[Lesh]

and leftists would call him an individualist, homophobe, transphobe, bigoted, racist, sexist monster, as they do with anyone whom they disagree with.

And they would disagree with most of the gospel once you got underneath the false soft cushion that leftists try to perpetuate.

Specifically what parts?

 

[The_Lyrical_Miracle]

Specifically what parts?

- Individualism, and the right to give freely instead of forced taxation with threat of economic or physical punishment. Jesus calls for giving to the poor out of your own free will, not from a state-enforced taxation.
- Obviously, abortion, homosexuality, and transexual doctrines are anti-Jesus

There are a lot of grey areas, and sadly exaggerated caricatures of conservatives by the left to try to claim Jesus.. it falls flat every time.

Christ was outside of political borders. He'll challenge Conservatives as much as he would Liberals. However, he'd probably oppose leftist totalitarian doctrine that we see in the US that has grown in the past 5-8 years.

 

[Lesh]

- Individualism, and the right to give freely instead of forced taxation with threat of economic or physical punishment. Jesus calls for giving to the poor out of your own free will, not from a state-enforced taxation.
- Obviously, abortion, homosexuality, and transexual doctrines are anti-Jesus

There are a lot of grey areas, and sadly exaggerated caricatures of conservatives by the left to try to claim Jesus.. it falls flat every time.

Christ was outside of political borders. He'll challenge Conservatives as much as he would Liberals. However, he'd probably oppose leftist totalitarian doctrine that we see in the US that has grown in the past 5-8 years.

I don't remember where Jesus weighed in on ANY of that garbage. Musta missed it in Sunday school.

I do remember

Love thy neighbor and a whole bunch of Beatitudes that you folks would NEVER sign on to

 

[The_Lyrical_Miracle]

I don't remember where Jesus weighed in on ANY of that garbage. Musta missed it in Sunday school.

I do remember

Love thy neighbor and a whole bunch of Beatitudes that you folks would NEVER sign on to

You can love someone and not agree with them.

And, if you don't agree with them, it doesn't mean you hate them.

The left says that if you disagree with them, you hate them.

What a falsehood, right?