You really haven't done any research on government run healthcare, rather you are just going off all the hype that the Democrats and Obama are trying to create. When you look at consequences that are a direct result of government stepping in and taking control, exactly what part of this is more beneficial to people when you look at the results many have to now live with as a consequence?
MASSCARE
Remarkable the extent to which you and other partisan rightists just dont get it.
The issue isnt whether or not the ACA is good or bad, or how the law is perceived in public opinion polls.
The issue is the rights untenable and unreasonable position that the president must negotiate concerning provisions of Federal law in existence for three years that are solely the purview of Congress.
That the partisan right in Congress has failed to amend or repeal the ACA is not the responsibility or fault of the president, the president cant be compelled to negotiate concerning an existing Federal law passed by both Houses of Congress, signed into law by the president, and upheld as Constitutional by the Supreme Court. And Congressional republicans have no grounds whatsoever to justify shutting down the government and jeopardizing the Nations economic well being because the president is acting in an appropriate, lawful, and Constitutional manner.
Moreover, the president is not the entity with whom the partisan right must negotiate, that entity is Congressional democrats.