When Republicans Began Losing IT

[Billiejeens]

Fool I obliterated your entire thread premise with one simple fact. Ask a mod to delete it, the thread is that dishonest. Hell it's so dishonest I'm surprised Biden or Pelosi didn't draft it.

Maybe they did

 

[Dadoalex]

Fool I obliterated your entire thread premise with one simple fact. Ask a mod to delete it, the thread is that dishonest. Hell it's so dishonest I'm surprised Biden or Pelosi didn't draft it.

Your absolute ignorance of history and attempt to derail the topic is noted.

That you believe Perot's run in 1992 is 'cheating" simply shows you've a victim of your own propaganda.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Troll.

PROJECTION

 

[j-mac]

Your absolute ignorance of history and attempt to derail the topic is noted.

That you believe Perot's run in 1992 is 'cheating" simply shows you've a victim of your own propaganda.

Clinton never received more than 50% of the popular vote…By your standards today he should have never been President..

 

[Dadoalex]

Clinton never received more than 50% of the popular vote…By your standards today he should have never been President..

Irrelevant and off topic.
and
Clearly demonstrating the factuality of the OP premise.

 

[j-mac]

Irrelevant and off topic.
and
Clearly demonstrating the factuality of the OP premise.

Oh? Tell me how….

 

[Dadoalex]

Oh? Tell me how….

By being irrelevant and off topic. Sheesh.

 

[j-mac]

By being irrelevant and off topic. Sheesh.

Well, you have fun then with your rant…no one cares..

Why start a thread if you only want narrow agreement?

You’re a fool.

 

[Dadoalex]

Well, you have fun then with your rant…no one cares..

Why start a thread if you only want narrow agreement?

You’re a fool.

If you have factual disagreement, cool.
If you have a disagreement over the interpretation of the facts, cool.

If you think Perot running for office was "cheating" you are not only a fool but a perfect example of the OP premise.

 

[deannalw]

Troll.

True- but I'm also right.

 

[j-mac]

If you have factual disagreement, cool.
If you have a disagreement over the interpretation of the facts, cool.

If you think Perot running for office was "cheating" you are not only a fool but a perfect example of the OP premise.

Look idiot, you don’t want any disagreement, so don’t pretend now like it’s “cool”… You’ve made yourself clear, now own it slimeball.

 

[Mac1958]

The parties specialize in over-reacting and over-compensating, and GQP lost its shit as part of an over-reaction to the Dems losing THEIR shit.

At the foundation of much of this is the Left's aggressive weaponization of PC & Identity Politics over the last couple of decades. They went FAR too far with that stuff, and the frustration and resentment has been building on the Right that whole time.

So along comes a shameless pied piper who addresses it directly, and the rest is infamy.

 

[j-mac]

The parties specialize in over-reacting and over-compensating, and GQP lost its shit as part of an over-reaction to the Dems losing THEIR shit.

At the foundation of much of this is the Left's aggressive weaponization of PC & Identity Politics over the last couple of decades. They went FAR too far with that stuff, and the frustration and resentment has been building on the Right that whole time.

So along comes a shameless pied piper who addresses it directly, and the rest is infamy.

Hmmm…tell us again, where’d you get your sociology degree from again?