How unscientific are the Biden's administration "green energy" policies!

[BlindBoo]

OH... so in 1900 when over 6,000 people died in a Hurricane (again remember this was before Global warming folks)
there were few hurricanes evidently. Wow... what a correlation Mr. Sun Worshipper!

Galveston was a flat island just a few feet above sea level in 1900. After that storm they not only built the Sea Wall but they also raise the entire livable portion of the island several feet.

Galveston Seawall and Grade Raising Project | ASCE

www.asce.org

However to the point, there is no study that can prove the small amount of warming attributed to mans burning of fuel has increase the strength or frequency of Atlantic or Gulf based storms. That's not to say it hasn't, just that no one has been able to measure it.

 

[healthmyths]

Galveston was a flat island just a few feet above sea level in 1900. After that storm they not only built the Sea Wall but they also raise the entire livable portion of the island several feet.

Galveston Seawall and Grade Raising Project | ASCE

www.asce.org

However to the point, there is no study that can prove the small amount of warming attributed to mans burning of fuel has increase the strength or frequency of Atlantic or Gulf based storms. That's not to say it hasn't, just that no one has been able to measure it.

No question. Having lived in the Rio Grande valley I visited there and understand your points. But that doesn't alter the data that I provided that hurricane history hasn't been recently increasing as we don't know what hurricane strengths before the table I attached, i.e. 1851! It is just the simple fact there is MORE coverage today.

 

[edthecynic]

BUT NO LINKS! NO Proof! Really if you are a lot smarter why do you depend on your own biased, ignorant and obviously UNINFORMED subjective opinion! Give me someone with expertise as I have. Where is yours? Really! Readers can make the decisions which of us is supported by the facts....!

You have given no "expert" who said trees remove 40% more carbon than the world produces each year, because there is no such "expert" that STUPID.
Everyone but YOU knows that trees store in their leaves carbon in the form of SUGAR through photosynthesis combining H2O and CO2, and when the leaves fall to the ground bacteria in the soil break the energy bonds built by photosynthesis, and the sugars are converted back to simple carbon dioxide and water, making a mature forest carbon neutral.

 

[edthecynic]

For example... Keystone. Why would any person want 34 oil tankers a month each carrying 1 million barrels of oil on the open ocean when a dry land pipe carrying 700 barrels per mile would cause less environmental damage?

That STUPIDITY was debunked when you first posted it years ago, so you already know you are LYING. The Keystone oil was for EXPORT on oil tankers which was the whole point of refining it on the Gulf Coast. There is NO oceanic pipeline, you IDIOT!

 

[BlindBoo]

No question. Having lived in the Rio Grande valley I visited there and understand your points. But that doesn't alter the data that I provided that hurricane history hasn't been recently increasing as we don't know what hurricane strengths before the table I attached, i.e. 1851! It is just the simple fact there is MORE coverage today.

I know it seem a bit un
natural but I'm agreeing with you.

Global Warming and Hurricanes – Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

Contents Summary Statement Global Warming and Atlantic Hurricanes Statistical relationships between SSTs and hurricanes Analysis of century-scale Atlantic tropical storm and hurricane frequency Analysis of other observed Atlantic hurricane metrics Model simulations of greenhouse warming...

www.gfdl.noaa.gov

• Very Likely: > 90%,
• Likely: > 66%
• More Likely Than Not (or Better Than Even Odds) > 50%

Remember these odds when reading.


Therefore, we conclude that it is premature to conclude with high confidence that increasing atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations from human activities have had a detectable impact on Atlantic basin hurricane activity, although increasing greenhouse gases are strongly linked to global warming. (“Detectable” here means the change is large enough to be distinguishable from the variability due to natural causes.) However, there is increasing evidence that the increase in tropical storm frequency in the Atlantic basin since the 1970s has been at least partly driven by decreases in aerosols from human activity and volcanic forcing. However, this does not imply that the increase will continue into the future, as a number of models project that greenhouse gas warming will lead to future decreases in Atlantic tropical storm frequency. Anthropogenic forcing may have already caused other changes in Atlantic hurricane activity that are not yet confidently detectable due to the small magnitude of the changes or observation limitations, or due to limitations in modeling and physical understanding (e.g., aerosol effects on regional climate, uncertainties in simulation of Atlantic multidecadal variability).

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I agree about flip flopping. But ignorance and hatred shouldn't be the rational for changing a policy.
The attached document shows the policies/statements made by Obama and re-supported by Biden that were "flipped" by Trump. Which ones were based on irrational, unscientific and most importantly had the greatest economic impact on Americans?
For example... Keystone. Why would any person want 34 oil tankers a month each carrying 1 million barrels of oil on the open ocean when a dry land pipe carrying 700 barrels per mile would cause less environmental damage?
Or why would anyone want to see 1,400 businesses employing 500,000 people that pay $100 BILLION a year in Federal/state and local property taxes go out of business? Or why would anyone want "skyrocketing" utilities or gas prices equal to Europe gas prices or the USA become Brazil's best oil customer? Do any of these attached sound like flip-flopping for the betterment of America?
View attachment 523464

Can't you use a source without this bad math?

 

[healthmyths]

You dishonestly provided links to only half the story, just like a professional LIAR, tell just enough truth to deliberately mislead, and then shut up.

Beware of the half-truth. You may have gotten hold of the wrong half.
- Seymour Essrog

A half-truth is a whole lie.
- Yiddish Proverb

So you are calling the Federal Government Depart of Ag.. liars?
"in one year a mature tree will absorb more than 48 pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and release oxygen in exchange."

The Power of One Tree - The Very Air We Breathe

The second in a series of blogs honoring the United Nation’s 2015 International Day of Forests On Saturday, March 21, the U.S. Forest Service will celebrate the United Nation’s International Day of Forests. With such an important worldwide recognition of all forests do for us humans, the Forest...

www.usda.gov

They are liars?
And therefore these people are liars?
Globally, there are estimated to be 3.04 trillion trees. This is according to a study published in the journal Nature. This means that there are roughly 422 trees for every person on earth.

How Many Trees Are in The World?(2024 New data)

The number of trees in the world has been estimated by two studies which show 50% fewer trees than when before humans were around.

www.gotreequotes.com

So does that mean this arithmetic is wrong?
3,040,000,000,000 trees each absorbing 48 lbs of C02 is hmmm... 72,960,000,000 tons of CO2.
Now...hmmm how much CO2 in the world...let's see what experts say: 26,030,591,200 tons.

The World Counts

www.theworldcounts.com

So let's see when you subtract 45.2 billion tons from say half of 72.96 billion tons absorbed... wow that
leaves ok 72.9 billion tons minus 45 billion hmmm leaves 27.7 billion tons to be replaced by decaying leaves as you pointed out!

 

[edthecynic]

So you are calling the Federal Government Depart of Ag.. liars?
"in one year a mature tree will absorb more than 48 pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and release oxygen in exchange."

The Power of One Tree - The Very Air We Breathe

The second in a series of blogs honoring the United Nation’s 2015 International Day of Forests On Saturday, March 21, the U.S. Forest Service will celebrate the United Nation’s International Day of Forests. With such an important worldwide recognition of all forests do for us humans, the Forest...

www.usda.gov

They are liars?
And therefore these people are liars?
Globally, there are estimated to be 3.04 trillion trees. This is according to a study published in the journal Nature. This means that there are roughly 422 trees for every person on earth.

How Many Trees Are in The World?(2024 New data)

The number of trees in the world has been estimated by two studies which show 50% fewer trees than when before humans were around.

www.gotreequotes.com

So does that mean this arithmetic is wrong?
3,040,000,000,000 trees each absorbing 48 lbs of C02 is hmmm... 72,960,000,000 tons of CO2.
Now...hmmm how much CO2 in the world...let's see what experts say: 26,030,591,200 tons.

The World Counts

www.theworldcounts.com

So let's see when you subtract 26.03 billion tons from say half of 72.96 billion tons absorbed... wow that
leaves ok 36 billion tons minus 26 billion hmmm leaves 10 billion... hmm and that's after subtracting 24 lbs due
to decaying leaves, etc.... or as you said half!!!

No matter how many times you repeat that BULLSHIT it will always be BULLSHIT.

 

[edthecynic]

So you are calling the Federal Government Depart of Ag.. liars?
"in one year a mature tree will absorb more than 48 pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and release oxygen in exchange."

The Power of One Tree - The Very Air We Breathe

The second in a series of blogs honoring the United Nation’s 2015 International Day of Forests On Saturday, March 21, the U.S. Forest Service will celebrate the United Nation’s International Day of Forests. With such an important worldwide recognition of all forests do for us humans, the Forest...

www.usda.gov

They are liars?
And therefore these people are liars?
Globally, there are estimated to be 3.04 trillion trees. This is according to a study published in the journal Nature. This means that there are roughly 422 trees for every person on earth.

How Many Trees Are in The World?(2024 New data)

The number of trees in the world has been estimated by two studies which show 50% fewer trees than when before humans were around.

www.gotreequotes.com

So does that mean this arithmetic is wrong?
3,040,000,000,000 trees each absorbing 48 lbs of C02 is hmmm... 72,960,000,000 tons of CO2.
Now...hmmm how much CO2 in the world...let's see what experts say: 26,030,591,200 tons.

The World Counts

www.theworldcounts.com

So let's see when you subtract 45.2 billion tons from say half of 72.96 billion tons absorbed... wow that
leaves ok 72.9 billion tons minus 45 billion hmmm leaves 27.7 billion tons to be replaced by decaying leaves as you pointed out!

This is part of one of the fundamental cycles in nature called the carbon cycle.

Carbon is being rolled through the environment -- first as a gas free in the atmosphere, then captured by plants and used to build sugars and other materials. Plant leaves fall to the ground. There the leaves are broken down by bacteria and put back into the atmosphere.